小学体育教育对两所不同高校小学生体育教育的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Francesca D’Elia
{"title":"小学体育教育对两所不同高校小学生体育教育的影响","authors":"Francesca D’Elia","doi":"10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The recent curricular reform of PE in primary schools has revealed several problematic issues, including the different training among the generalist teacher, a graduated in primary teacher education sciences, who taught in I, II and III classes, and the specialist in exercise and sport science, who taught in IV and V classes. A comprehensive study is required to investigate the impact of this legislative innovation on primary teacher education students, who are future generalist teachers, at two separate sites, in order to include the perspective of trainees as internal stakeholders. The aim was to investigate the perceptions of primary teacher education students on the compulsory teaching of PE, as well as the adequacy of their training to teach PE, and to verify which variables could influence their perceptions on PE teaching. Methods: The sample consisted of 281 primary teacher education students from two south Italy Universities, who completed an ad-hoc questionnaire, focused on their experiences as a trainee, the adequacy of their training to teach PE and the importance of the specialist teacher in PE. Data were analyzed using Chi Square (X2). P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Students considered important the introduction of the specialist teacher in primary school to teach PE (76.4 %), because of the perceived inadequacy of own training (49.3%). Observing PE lessons increased perceptions of preparation to design lessons using heuristic and prescriptive methods (P =.03). Students who considered important the PE specialist in primary school, believed that it should be present in the curricular teaching of PE (P =.00). The perceived adequacy of own training to teach PE increased the perceived competence to assess children’s physical competences (P =.00) and the usefulness of this practice (P =.00). Prescriptive teaching was considered the most effective method (P =.00). Conclusions: Future generalist teachers showed interest for the discipline but demonstrated training gaps, such as children’s movement assessment and general training on PE, that need to be filled using a comprehensive and experiential approach. Academic institutions should use this information to improve student’s training for PE teaching, since the role of specialist teacher is currently provided only for V and IV classes. Keywords: sports reform; generalist teacher; health promotion; core curricula; university training.","PeriodicalId":42772,"journal":{"name":"Acta Kinesiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical education in primary school and impact on primary teacher education students from two different university sites\",\"authors\":\"Francesca D’Elia\",\"doi\":\"10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The recent curricular reform of PE in primary schools has revealed several problematic issues, including the different training among the generalist teacher, a graduated in primary teacher education sciences, who taught in I, II and III classes, and the specialist in exercise and sport science, who taught in IV and V classes. A comprehensive study is required to investigate the impact of this legislative innovation on primary teacher education students, who are future generalist teachers, at two separate sites, in order to include the perspective of trainees as internal stakeholders. The aim was to investigate the perceptions of primary teacher education students on the compulsory teaching of PE, as well as the adequacy of their training to teach PE, and to verify which variables could influence their perceptions on PE teaching. Methods: The sample consisted of 281 primary teacher education students from two south Italy Universities, who completed an ad-hoc questionnaire, focused on their experiences as a trainee, the adequacy of their training to teach PE and the importance of the specialist teacher in PE. Data were analyzed using Chi Square (X2). P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Students considered important the introduction of the specialist teacher in primary school to teach PE (76.4 %), because of the perceived inadequacy of own training (49.3%). Observing PE lessons increased perceptions of preparation to design lessons using heuristic and prescriptive methods (P =.03). Students who considered important the PE specialist in primary school, believed that it should be present in the curricular teaching of PE (P =.00). The perceived adequacy of own training to teach PE increased the perceived competence to assess children’s physical competences (P =.00) and the usefulness of this practice (P =.00). Prescriptive teaching was considered the most effective method (P =.00). Conclusions: Future generalist teachers showed interest for the discipline but demonstrated training gaps, such as children’s movement assessment and general training on PE, that need to be filled using a comprehensive and experiential approach. Academic institutions should use this information to improve student’s training for PE teaching, since the role of specialist teacher is currently provided only for V and IV classes. Keywords: sports reform; generalist teacher; health promotion; core curricula; university training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Kinesiologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Kinesiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Kinesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的小学体育课程改革暴露出几个问题,包括在一、二、三班教授小学教师教育科学专业毕业的通才教师和在四、五班教授运动与体育科学专业的专家之间的培训不同。需要在两个不同的地点调查这一立法创新对小学教师教育学生(未来的通才教师)的影响,以便纳入学员作为内部利益相关者的观点。目的是调查小学教师教育学生对体育义务教学的看法,以及他们的体育教学训练的充分性,并验证哪些变量会影响他们对体育教学的看法。方法:样本由来自意大利南部两所大学的281名小学教师教育学生组成,他们完成了一份特别问卷,重点是他们作为实习生的经历,他们的体育教学培训的充分性以及体育专业教师的重要性。数据采用卡方(X2)分析。P & lt;0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:小学生认为引进专业教师进行体育教学很重要(76.4%),认为自身培训不足(49.3%)。观察体育课程增加了使用启发式和规定性方法设计课程的准备意识(P =.03)。认为体育专家在小学体育课程教学中发挥重要作用的学生认为(P =.00)。感知到自身体育训练的充分性增加了评估儿童身体能力的感知能力(P = 0.000)和这种实践的有用性(P = 0.000)。规定性教学被认为是最有效的方法(P =.00)。结论:未来的通才教师对这门学科表现出兴趣,但在培训方面存在空白,如儿童运动评估和体育方面的一般培训,这些空白需要通过综合和经验的方法来填补。学术机构应该利用这些信息来改进学生的体育教学培训,因为目前专业教师的角色只在五和四班提供。关键词:体育改革;多面手的老师;健康促进;核心课程;大学培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physical education in primary school and impact on primary teacher education students from two different university sites
Purpose: The recent curricular reform of PE in primary schools has revealed several problematic issues, including the different training among the generalist teacher, a graduated in primary teacher education sciences, who taught in I, II and III classes, and the specialist in exercise and sport science, who taught in IV and V classes. A comprehensive study is required to investigate the impact of this legislative innovation on primary teacher education students, who are future generalist teachers, at two separate sites, in order to include the perspective of trainees as internal stakeholders. The aim was to investigate the perceptions of primary teacher education students on the compulsory teaching of PE, as well as the adequacy of their training to teach PE, and to verify which variables could influence their perceptions on PE teaching. Methods: The sample consisted of 281 primary teacher education students from two south Italy Universities, who completed an ad-hoc questionnaire, focused on their experiences as a trainee, the adequacy of their training to teach PE and the importance of the specialist teacher in PE. Data were analyzed using Chi Square (X2). P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Students considered important the introduction of the specialist teacher in primary school to teach PE (76.4 %), because of the perceived inadequacy of own training (49.3%). Observing PE lessons increased perceptions of preparation to design lessons using heuristic and prescriptive methods (P =.03). Students who considered important the PE specialist in primary school, believed that it should be present in the curricular teaching of PE (P =.00). The perceived adequacy of own training to teach PE increased the perceived competence to assess children’s physical competences (P =.00) and the usefulness of this practice (P =.00). Prescriptive teaching was considered the most effective method (P =.00). Conclusions: Future generalist teachers showed interest for the discipline but demonstrated training gaps, such as children’s movement assessment and general training on PE, that need to be filled using a comprehensive and experiential approach. Academic institutions should use this information to improve student’s training for PE teaching, since the role of specialist teacher is currently provided only for V and IV classes. Keywords: sports reform; generalist teacher; health promotion; core curricula; university training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Kinesiologica
Acta Kinesiologica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信