创伤对内部整合的影响:救灾行动中的方法-回避分析

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Llord Brooks, Iana Shaheen, David Dobrzykowski
{"title":"创伤对内部整合的影响:救灾行动中的方法-回避分析","authors":"Llord Brooks, Iana Shaheen, David Dobrzykowski","doi":"10.1111/poms.14081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Disaster relief workers face unique factors in their operating environments that can inhibit internal integration. For example, disaster relief often involves exposure to traumatic events affecting relief workers’ commitment to cooperation and the organization. As such, disaster relief organizations dedicate substantial amounts of scarce resources to support workers exposed to trauma. Unfortunately, contradictory views exist in the literature on how trauma exposure affects commitment and integrative behaviors and how supervisor support influences these relationships. Based on the approach‐avoidance coping theory, we test whether trauma exposure has positive or negative effects. We test our hypotheses on data from 300 disaster relief workers collected using a 2 × 3 factorial scenario‐based experiment. We find that trauma exposure evokes avoidance coping behaviors, which decrease individuals’ cooperative disposition and approach coping behaviors, which motivate organizational commitment. Next, we show that both forms of commitment have a nonlinear convex relationship with internal integration and mediate the relationship between trauma exposure and internal integration. Finally, we find that supervisor support amplifies these relationships. When exposed to trauma, supervisor approach and avoidance orientations provide higher internal integration levels than subjects exposed to no supervisor support. These findings extend the literature on disaster relief management, integration, and support, guiding decision‐making regarding support investments in disaster relief organizations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of trauma on internal integration: An approach‐avoidance analysis in disaster relief operations\",\"authors\":\"Llord Brooks, Iana Shaheen, David Dobrzykowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/poms.14081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Disaster relief workers face unique factors in their operating environments that can inhibit internal integration. For example, disaster relief often involves exposure to traumatic events affecting relief workers’ commitment to cooperation and the organization. As such, disaster relief organizations dedicate substantial amounts of scarce resources to support workers exposed to trauma. Unfortunately, contradictory views exist in the literature on how trauma exposure affects commitment and integrative behaviors and how supervisor support influences these relationships. Based on the approach‐avoidance coping theory, we test whether trauma exposure has positive or negative effects. We test our hypotheses on data from 300 disaster relief workers collected using a 2 × 3 factorial scenario‐based experiment. We find that trauma exposure evokes avoidance coping behaviors, which decrease individuals’ cooperative disposition and approach coping behaviors, which motivate organizational commitment. Next, we show that both forms of commitment have a nonlinear convex relationship with internal integration and mediate the relationship between trauma exposure and internal integration. Finally, we find that supervisor support amplifies these relationships. When exposed to trauma, supervisor approach and avoidance orientations provide higher internal integration levels than subjects exposed to no supervisor support. These findings extend the literature on disaster relief management, integration, and support, guiding decision‐making regarding support investments in disaster relief organizations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved\",\"PeriodicalId\":20623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production and Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production and Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.14081\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.14081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

救灾人员在工作环境中面临着独特的因素,这些因素会抑制内部整合。例如,救灾往往涉及到影响救援人员对合作和组织的承诺的创伤性事件。因此,救灾组织投入了大量的稀缺资源来支持遭受创伤的工作人员。不幸的是,关于创伤暴露如何影响承诺和整合行为以及主管支持如何影响这些关系,文献中存在矛盾的观点。基于接近-回避应对理论,我们测试创伤暴露是否有积极或消极的影响。我们使用基于2 × 3析因情景的实验对300名救灾人员的数据进行了假设检验。研究发现,创伤暴露诱发了回避性应对行为,从而降低了个体的合作倾向和接近性应对行为,进而激发了组织承诺。接下来,我们发现两种形式的承诺都与内部整合存在非线性凸关系,并在创伤暴露与内部整合之间起到中介作用。最后,我们发现主管的支持放大了这些关系。当被试暴露于创伤时,导师方法和回避取向比没有导师支持的被试提供更高的内部整合水平。这些发现扩展了关于救灾管理、整合和支持的文献,指导了有关救灾组织支持投资的决策。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of trauma on internal integration: An approach‐avoidance analysis in disaster relief operations
Abstract Disaster relief workers face unique factors in their operating environments that can inhibit internal integration. For example, disaster relief often involves exposure to traumatic events affecting relief workers’ commitment to cooperation and the organization. As such, disaster relief organizations dedicate substantial amounts of scarce resources to support workers exposed to trauma. Unfortunately, contradictory views exist in the literature on how trauma exposure affects commitment and integrative behaviors and how supervisor support influences these relationships. Based on the approach‐avoidance coping theory, we test whether trauma exposure has positive or negative effects. We test our hypotheses on data from 300 disaster relief workers collected using a 2 × 3 factorial scenario‐based experiment. We find that trauma exposure evokes avoidance coping behaviors, which decrease individuals’ cooperative disposition and approach coping behaviors, which motivate organizational commitment. Next, we show that both forms of commitment have a nonlinear convex relationship with internal integration and mediate the relationship between trauma exposure and internal integration. Finally, we find that supervisor support amplifies these relationships. When exposed to trauma, supervisor approach and avoidance orientations provide higher internal integration levels than subjects exposed to no supervisor support. These findings extend the literature on disaster relief management, integration, and support, guiding decision‐making regarding support investments in disaster relief organizations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信