{"title":"保险法中压倒一切的强制性规定和汽车保险指令2009/103/EC中的法律冲突规则","authors":"Mariusz Fras","doi":"10.26881/gsp.2023.3.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary concerns the judgement of 31.01.2019 in the case of Agostinho da Silva Martins (C-149/18), in which the CJEU ruled on the relation of the provisions contained in the Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC of 16.09.2009 to EU conflict-of-laws rules contained in the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.","PeriodicalId":12629,"journal":{"name":"Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze","volume":"356 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overriding Mandatory Provisions in Insurance Law and the Conflict-of-laws Rules in the Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC\",\"authors\":\"Mariusz Fras\",\"doi\":\"10.26881/gsp.2023.3.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary concerns the judgement of 31.01.2019 in the case of Agostinho da Silva Martins (C-149/18), in which the CJEU ruled on the relation of the provisions contained in the Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC of 16.09.2009 to EU conflict-of-laws rules contained in the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze\",\"volume\":\"356 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2023.3.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2023.3.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本评注涉及2019年1月31日对Agostinho da Silva Martins一案的判决(C-149/18)，其中欧洲法院就2009年9月16日第2009/103/EC号汽车保险指令所载条款与《罗马II条例》中关于非合同义务适用法律的欧盟法律冲突规则的关系作出裁决。
Overriding Mandatory Provisions in Insurance Law and the Conflict-of-laws Rules in the Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC
This commentary concerns the judgement of 31.01.2019 in the case of Agostinho da Silva Martins (C-149/18), in which the CJEU ruled on the relation of the provisions contained in the Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC of 16.09.2009 to EU conflict-of-laws rules contained in the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
