RPER软件-快速参与式解放研究的社会管理工具:规划,设计和实施

Q4 Social Sciences
Luiz Flávio Felizardo, Marcelo Osório Wallau, José Roberto Pereira
{"title":"RPER软件-快速参与式解放研究的社会管理工具:规划,设计和实施","authors":"Luiz Flávio Felizardo, Marcelo Osório Wallau, José Roberto Pereira","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical framework: This study is grounded in Social Management, a paradigm that focuses on society's deliberative process for public decisions. It also employs the Rapid Participatory and Emancipatory Research (RPER) method, an adaptation of rapid and participatory appraisals, to apply social management in rural contexts.
 
 Research objectives: Identify the requirements, plan, design, assess the complexity, and implement a system to support the RPER application.
 
 Methodology: The waterfall model for software development lifecycle was used to carry out the system's planning. The discipline of Business Process Management (BPM) was necessary for the requirements mapping and the Function Point Analysis (FPA) technique to measure the software complexity from a user perspective.
 
 Results: The RPER application process was fully mapped, and several features that could be implemented for the software were uncovered. These functionalities address practically all the steps involved in the method’s application. In addition, the software measurement was completed, and 542 function points were found. After this, the design for the graphical user interface was then created. Finally, the software was developed using technologies such as Express for building the back-end RESTful API with Node.js, React library to create the front-end’s componentized user interface, TypeScript as the main programming language and PostgreSQL as the relational database.
 
 Originality: It is notable that some software has already been used to try and promote social participation in public matters. However, studies specific to the use of information and communication technology (ICT) to resolve social issues, and, at the same time, dealing specifically with participatory techniques are non-existent. There is an overflow of software tools designed to support quantitative research in the agriculture field, yet there remains a notable deficiency in software tailored to assist qualitative research and practices.
 
 Theoretical and practical contributions: The use of a web system on participatory approaches can bring advantages. In the theoretical side, this research might provide insights into these methods’ evolution. It will also provide a foundational framework for understanding the intersection of ICT and participatory techniques, paving the way for future research in this area. Some other more practical benefits include the wider distribution and dissemination of results, data transparency, the unification or centralization of the research made using the methods, the organization of data, the possibility of automation on report generation, better communication and collaboration between team members, and data safety with periodic backups. Nonetheless, the software could serve as a platform for preparing new researchers with help and tips section for each of the methods’ techniques.
","PeriodicalId":38210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RPER Software - A Social Management Tool for Rapid Participatory Emancipatory Research: Planning, Design and Implementation\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Flávio Felizardo, Marcelo Osório Wallau, José Roberto Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretical framework: This study is grounded in Social Management, a paradigm that focuses on society's deliberative process for public decisions. It also employs the Rapid Participatory and Emancipatory Research (RPER) method, an adaptation of rapid and participatory appraisals, to apply social management in rural contexts.
 
 Research objectives: Identify the requirements, plan, design, assess the complexity, and implement a system to support the RPER application.
 
 Methodology: The waterfall model for software development lifecycle was used to carry out the system's planning. The discipline of Business Process Management (BPM) was necessary for the requirements mapping and the Function Point Analysis (FPA) technique to measure the software complexity from a user perspective.
 
 Results: The RPER application process was fully mapped, and several features that could be implemented for the software were uncovered. These functionalities address practically all the steps involved in the method’s application. In addition, the software measurement was completed, and 542 function points were found. After this, the design for the graphical user interface was then created. Finally, the software was developed using technologies such as Express for building the back-end RESTful API with Node.js, React library to create the front-end’s componentized user interface, TypeScript as the main programming language and PostgreSQL as the relational database.
 
 Originality: It is notable that some software has already been used to try and promote social participation in public matters. However, studies specific to the use of information and communication technology (ICT) to resolve social issues, and, at the same time, dealing specifically with participatory techniques are non-existent. There is an overflow of software tools designed to support quantitative research in the agriculture field, yet there remains a notable deficiency in software tailored to assist qualitative research and practices.
 
 Theoretical and practical contributions: The use of a web system on participatory approaches can bring advantages. In the theoretical side, this research might provide insights into these methods’ evolution. It will also provide a foundational framework for understanding the intersection of ICT and participatory techniques, paving the way for future research in this area. Some other more practical benefits include the wider distribution and dissemination of results, data transparency, the unification or centralization of the research made using the methods, the organization of data, the possibility of automation on report generation, better communication and collaboration between team members, and data safety with periodic backups. Nonetheless, the software could serve as a platform for preparing new researchers with help and tips section for each of the methods’ techniques.
\",\"PeriodicalId\":38210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n10-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论框架:本研究以社会管理为基础,这是一种关注社会公共决策审议过程的范式。它还采用快速参与性和解放性研究(RPER)方法,这是对快速参与性评价的一种调整,以便在农村环境中应用社会管理。& # x0D;研究目标:确定需求,计划,设计,评估复杂性,并实现一个支持RPER应用的系统。 & # x0D;方法:采用软件开发生命周期的瀑布模型来执行系统的规划。业务流程管理(BPM)规程对于需求映射和功能点分析(FPA)技术来说是必要的,以便从用户的角度度量软件的复杂性。 & # x0D;结果:完整映射了RPER应用流程,揭示了该软件可实现的几个特性。这些功能实际上处理了方法应用中涉及的所有步骤。此外,完成了软件测量,发现542个功能点。在此之后,图形用户界面的设计就创建了。最后,采用Express技术与Node.js构建后端RESTful API,使用React库创建前端组组化用户界面,使用TypeScript作为主要编程语言,使用PostgreSQL作为关系数据库。 & # x0D;独创性:值得注意的是,一些软件已经被用来尝试和促进社会参与公共事务。但是,关于利用信息和通信技术解决社会问题的具体研究,以及同时具体处理参与性技术的研究是不存在的。用于支持农业领域定量研究的软件工具已经泛滥,但用于辅助定性研究和实践的软件仍然明显缺乏。 & # x0D;理论和实践贡献:在参与式方法中使用网络系统可以带来优势。在理论方面,这项研究可能为这些方法的演变提供见解。它还将为理解信息通信技术和参与式技术的交叉提供一个基础框架,为这一领域的未来研究铺平道路。其他一些更实际的好处包括更广泛地分发和传播结果、数据透明度、使用这些方法进行的研究的统一或集中、数据的组织、报告生成自动化的可能性、团队成员之间更好的沟通和协作,以及定期备份数据的安全性。尽管如此,该软件可以作为一个平台,为新研究人员提供每个方法技术的帮助和提示部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RPER Software - A Social Management Tool for Rapid Participatory Emancipatory Research: Planning, Design and Implementation
Theoretical framework: This study is grounded in Social Management, a paradigm that focuses on society's deliberative process for public decisions. It also employs the Rapid Participatory and Emancipatory Research (RPER) method, an adaptation of rapid and participatory appraisals, to apply social management in rural contexts. Research objectives: Identify the requirements, plan, design, assess the complexity, and implement a system to support the RPER application. Methodology: The waterfall model for software development lifecycle was used to carry out the system's planning. The discipline of Business Process Management (BPM) was necessary for the requirements mapping and the Function Point Analysis (FPA) technique to measure the software complexity from a user perspective. Results: The RPER application process was fully mapped, and several features that could be implemented for the software were uncovered. These functionalities address practically all the steps involved in the method’s application. In addition, the software measurement was completed, and 542 function points were found. After this, the design for the graphical user interface was then created. Finally, the software was developed using technologies such as Express for building the back-end RESTful API with Node.js, React library to create the front-end’s componentized user interface, TypeScript as the main programming language and PostgreSQL as the relational database. Originality: It is notable that some software has already been used to try and promote social participation in public matters. However, studies specific to the use of information and communication technology (ICT) to resolve social issues, and, at the same time, dealing specifically with participatory techniques are non-existent. There is an overflow of software tools designed to support quantitative research in the agriculture field, yet there remains a notable deficiency in software tailored to assist qualitative research and practices. Theoretical and practical contributions: The use of a web system on participatory approaches can bring advantages. In the theoretical side, this research might provide insights into these methods’ evolution. It will also provide a foundational framework for understanding the intersection of ICT and participatory techniques, paving the way for future research in this area. Some other more practical benefits include the wider distribution and dissemination of results, data transparency, the unification or centralization of the research made using the methods, the organization of data, the possibility of automation on report generation, better communication and collaboration between team members, and data safety with periodic backups. Nonetheless, the software could serve as a platform for preparing new researchers with help and tips section for each of the methods’ techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信