联邦制、社团制和立法权对德国卫生体制转型的影响

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Tugce Schmitt
{"title":"联邦制、社团制和立法权对德国卫生体制转型的影响","authors":"Tugce Schmitt","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2023.2277778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International comparisons show that although health services are becoming increasingly digital, interconnected, and person-centred in industrialised countries, Germany lags behind in utilising and linking health data to provide better healthcare. A detailed analysis focusing on structural factors is crucial for policy studies involving international comparisons and country rankings. In Germany, factors such as the constraints of federalism, a well-established bureaucracy and a fragmented political decision-making system contribute to a deeply rooted resistance to change across various public service sectors. In the same vein, this article outlines the current landscape of data-driven innovations in the German health system. It identifies federalism, corporatism, and legislative power as three structural reasons why the country has been lagging behind in this field, while also discussing potential future developments.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"46 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Tugce Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644008.2023.2277778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International comparisons show that although health services are becoming increasingly digital, interconnected, and person-centred in industrialised countries, Germany lags behind in utilising and linking health data to provide better healthcare. A detailed analysis focusing on structural factors is crucial for policy studies involving international comparisons and country rankings. In Germany, factors such as the constraints of federalism, a well-established bureaucracy and a fragmented political decision-making system contribute to a deeply rooted resistance to change across various public service sectors. In the same vein, this article outlines the current landscape of data-driven innovations in the German health system. It identifies federalism, corporatism, and legislative power as three structural reasons why the country has been lagging behind in this field, while also discussing potential future developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Politics\",\"volume\":\"46 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2277778\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2277778","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际比较表明,尽管工业化国家的卫生服务日益数字化、相互联系和以人为本,但德国在利用和联系卫生数据以提供更好的卫生保健方面落后。对于涉及国际比较和国家排名的政策研究来说,重点放在结构性因素上的详细分析至关重要。在德国,诸如联邦制的约束、根深蒂固的官僚体制和支离破碎的政治决策体系等因素,导致了对各个公共服务部门变革的根深蒂固的抵制。本着同样的精神,本文概述了德国卫生系统中数据驱动创新的现状。它认为联邦制、社团主义和立法权是该国在这一领域落后的三个结构性原因,同时也讨论了潜在的未来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany
International comparisons show that although health services are becoming increasingly digital, interconnected, and person-centred in industrialised countries, Germany lags behind in utilising and linking health data to provide better healthcare. A detailed analysis focusing on structural factors is crucial for policy studies involving international comparisons and country rankings. In Germany, factors such as the constraints of federalism, a well-established bureaucracy and a fragmented political decision-making system contribute to a deeply rooted resistance to change across various public service sectors. In the same vein, this article outlines the current landscape of data-driven innovations in the German health system. It identifies federalism, corporatism, and legislative power as three structural reasons why the country has been lagging behind in this field, while also discussing potential future developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信