刑事诉讼法修改草案》基本原则中存在的问题

Q4 Social Sciences
Tomáš Gřivna
{"title":"刑事诉讼法修改草案》基本原则中存在的问题","authors":"Tomáš Gřivna","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the basic principles of criminal procedure as set out in the draft of the new Criminal Procedure Code. The author also presents the work of the recodification commission on these principles. He mentions the problems connected with their expression in the text of the code and their systematic arrangement. Two principles are examined in detail. Concerning the principle of legality, he considers the discretionary powers of the prosecutor and the method of controlling compliance with it. With regard to the principle of substantive truth, he discusses the extent to which this principle is eroded by institutions adopted from other legal systems.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu\",\"authors\":\"Tomáš Gřivna\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2023.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses the basic principles of criminal procedure as set out in the draft of the new Criminal Procedure Code. The author also presents the work of the recodification commission on these principles. He mentions the problems connected with their expression in the text of the code and their systematic arrangement. Two principles are examined in detail. Concerning the principle of legality, he considers the discretionary powers of the prosecutor and the method of controlling compliance with it. With regard to the principle of substantive truth, he discusses the extent to which this principle is eroded by institutions adopted from other legal systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了新《刑事诉讼法》草案中确立的刑事诉讼基本原则。作者还介绍了再认证委员会在这些原则方面的工作。他提到了与法典文本中它们的表达及其系统安排有关的问题。本文详细探讨了两个原则。关于合法性原则,他考虑了检察官的自由裁量权和控制遵守该原则的方法。关于实质真理原则,他讨论了从其他法律制度中采纳的制度对这一原则的侵蚀程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu
The paper discusses the basic principles of criminal procedure as set out in the draft of the new Criminal Procedure Code. The author also presents the work of the recodification commission on these principles. He mentions the problems connected with their expression in the text of the code and their systematic arrangement. Two principles are examined in detail. Concerning the principle of legality, he considers the discretionary powers of the prosecutor and the method of controlling compliance with it. With regard to the principle of substantive truth, he discusses the extent to which this principle is eroded by institutions adopted from other legal systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信