醋酸浸泡阴道米索前列醇终止漏产的疗效观察

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sahar Razzaq, Sahar fartosy, Rana Abdulkadeer
{"title":"醋酸浸泡阴道米索前列醇终止漏产的疗效观察","authors":"Sahar Razzaq, Sahar fartosy, Rana Abdulkadeer","doi":"10.5455/rmj.20230118083738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate whether or not acetic acid-moistened intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than dry intravaginal misoprostol for inducing abortion at fewer than 24 weeks of gestation. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was performed at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Imamein Al-Kadhimain Medical City (IKMC), Baghdad from January to May 2022. Fifty outpatients with fetal death before 24 weeks were hospitalized for termination of pregnancy were included in the study. They were aged 15–42 years and had parity 0-6. The gestational age in weeks ranged from 13 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Participants were divided in 2 groups; first group on misoprostol and acetic acid and second group on misoprostol only. Results: There is significant difference mean of no. of doses and time of abortion between the 2 groups. Females who received misoprostol and acetic acid had less doses and less abortion time than those who received misoprostol only. Conclusion: Females who received misoprostol and acetic acid had less doses and less abortion time than females who received misoprostol only.","PeriodicalId":20844,"journal":{"name":"Rawal Medical Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of vaginal misoprostol soaked in acetic acid in the termination of missed miscarriages\",\"authors\":\"Sahar Razzaq, Sahar fartosy, Rana Abdulkadeer\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/rmj.20230118083738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate whether or not acetic acid-moistened intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than dry intravaginal misoprostol for inducing abortion at fewer than 24 weeks of gestation. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was performed at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Imamein Al-Kadhimain Medical City (IKMC), Baghdad from January to May 2022. Fifty outpatients with fetal death before 24 weeks were hospitalized for termination of pregnancy were included in the study. They were aged 15–42 years and had parity 0-6. The gestational age in weeks ranged from 13 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Participants were divided in 2 groups; first group on misoprostol and acetic acid and second group on misoprostol only. Results: There is significant difference mean of no. of doses and time of abortion between the 2 groups. Females who received misoprostol and acetic acid had less doses and less abortion time than those who received misoprostol only. Conclusion: Females who received misoprostol and acetic acid had less doses and less abortion time than females who received misoprostol only.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rawal Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rawal Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/rmj.20230118083738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rawal Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/rmj.20230118083738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价醋酸湿性阴道内米索前列醇是否比干性阴道内米索前列醇更有效地用于妊娠24周以内的人工流产。方法:这项横断面研究于2022年1月至5月在巴格达Al-Imamein Al-Kadhimain医疗城(IKMC)的妇产科进行。本研究包括50例门诊24周前胎儿死亡住院终止妊娠的患者。他们年龄在15-42岁之间,胎次0-6。胎龄为13 ~ 24周。参与者分为两组;第一组服用米索前列醇和醋酸,第二组只服用米索前列醇。结果:两组间差异有统计学意义。两组流产剂量及流产时间比较。服用米索前列醇和醋酸的女性比只服用米索前列醇的女性流产剂量少,流产时间短。结论:女性服用米索前列醇和醋酸组比单独服用米索前列醇组的剂量少,流产时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of vaginal misoprostol soaked in acetic acid in the termination of missed miscarriages
Objective: To evaluate whether or not acetic acid-moistened intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than dry intravaginal misoprostol for inducing abortion at fewer than 24 weeks of gestation. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was performed at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Imamein Al-Kadhimain Medical City (IKMC), Baghdad from January to May 2022. Fifty outpatients with fetal death before 24 weeks were hospitalized for termination of pregnancy were included in the study. They were aged 15–42 years and had parity 0-6. The gestational age in weeks ranged from 13 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Participants were divided in 2 groups; first group on misoprostol and acetic acid and second group on misoprostol only. Results: There is significant difference mean of no. of doses and time of abortion between the 2 groups. Females who received misoprostol and acetic acid had less doses and less abortion time than those who received misoprostol only. Conclusion: Females who received misoprostol and acetic acid had less doses and less abortion time than females who received misoprostol only.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rawal Medical Journal
Rawal Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: RMJ is a general Medicine publication and accepts oorigial articles, editorials, case reports and commentaries. It aims to dessiminate medical knowldge to professional community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信