西班牙大学入学历史考试:自治区间的分析与比较

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Judit Ruiz-Lázaro, Coral González-Barbera, José-Luis Gaviria-Soto
{"title":"西班牙大学入学历史考试:自治区间的分析与比较","authors":"Judit Ruiz-Lázaro, Coral González-Barbera, José-Luis Gaviria-Soto","doi":"10.22550/rep81-3-2023-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The university entry procedure is a critical aspect for students gaining entry to higher education. This work has a dual purpose: to analyse the structure of the Spanish History test for university entry, according to the autonomous region in which it is designed, and to study the relationship between the differences observed in the structure and average performance obtained by students. A comparative analysis has been carried out with a methodological approach of rational analysis of documentary evidence with sixty-eight exams from 2019, adapting the approach proposed by García-Garrido (1991). Likewise, a secondary analysis has been conducted of the data published annually by the Integrated University Information System. The results show substantial differences in the assessment of national historical knowledge: in the structure and content, in the cognitive level and in the marks. Disparities are specifically observed in the language of the test, in the optional nature, in the number of questions and in the content blocks that are assessed: in Catalonia, Valencia and the Basque Country, neither Ancient History nor the Middle Ages, nor the Modern Era are assessed. Likewise, the Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, Cantabria, Castile-La Mancha and Castile and León demand a higher cognitive level from their students. These aspects determine the heterogeneity in the constructs used, in such a way that neither the same understanding nor the same skills of national historical knowledge are being measured throughout the autonomous regions.","PeriodicalId":45907,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Spanish History test for university entry: Analysis and comparison among autonomous regions\",\"authors\":\"Judit Ruiz-Lázaro, Coral González-Barbera, José-Luis Gaviria-Soto\",\"doi\":\"10.22550/rep81-3-2023-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The university entry procedure is a critical aspect for students gaining entry to higher education. This work has a dual purpose: to analyse the structure of the Spanish History test for university entry, according to the autonomous region in which it is designed, and to study the relationship between the differences observed in the structure and average performance obtained by students. A comparative analysis has been carried out with a methodological approach of rational analysis of documentary evidence with sixty-eight exams from 2019, adapting the approach proposed by García-Garrido (1991). Likewise, a secondary analysis has been conducted of the data published annually by the Integrated University Information System. The results show substantial differences in the assessment of national historical knowledge: in the structure and content, in the cognitive level and in the marks. Disparities are specifically observed in the language of the test, in the optional nature, in the number of questions and in the content blocks that are assessed: in Catalonia, Valencia and the Basque Country, neither Ancient History nor the Middle Ages, nor the Modern Era are assessed. Likewise, the Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, Cantabria, Castile-La Mancha and Castile and León demand a higher cognitive level from their students. These aspects determine the heterogeneity in the constructs used, in such a way that neither the same understanding nor the same skills of national historical knowledge are being measured throughout the autonomous regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22550/rep81-3-2023-07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22550/rep81-3-2023-07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大学入学程序是学生进入高等教育的一个关键方面。这项工作有双重目的:根据其设计的自治区分析西班牙大学入学历史考试的结构,并研究在结构中观察到的差异与学生获得的平均成绩之间的关系。采用García-Garrido(1991)提出的方法,采用2019年以来68项考试的文献证据理性分析方法进行了比较分析。同样,对大学综合信息系统每年公布的数据进行了二次分析。结果显示,国家历史知识的评估在结构和内容、认知水平和分数方面存在实质性差异。在考试的语言、可选性质、问题数量和评估的内容块方面,差异尤为明显:在加泰罗尼亚、瓦伦西亚和巴斯克地区,既不评估古代历史,也不评估中世纪历史,也不评估现代历史。同样,巴利阿里群岛、加那利群岛、坎塔布里亚群岛、卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰和卡斯蒂利亚以及León对学生的认知水平要求更高。这些方面决定了所使用的结构的异质性,因此,在整个自治区内,对民族历史知识的理解和技能都不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Spanish History test for university entry: Analysis and comparison among autonomous regions
The university entry procedure is a critical aspect for students gaining entry to higher education. This work has a dual purpose: to analyse the structure of the Spanish History test for university entry, according to the autonomous region in which it is designed, and to study the relationship between the differences observed in the structure and average performance obtained by students. A comparative analysis has been carried out with a methodological approach of rational analysis of documentary evidence with sixty-eight exams from 2019, adapting the approach proposed by García-Garrido (1991). Likewise, a secondary analysis has been conducted of the data published annually by the Integrated University Information System. The results show substantial differences in the assessment of national historical knowledge: in the structure and content, in the cognitive level and in the marks. Disparities are specifically observed in the language of the test, in the optional nature, in the number of questions and in the content blocks that are assessed: in Catalonia, Valencia and the Basque Country, neither Ancient History nor the Middle Ages, nor the Modern Era are assessed. Likewise, the Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, Cantabria, Castile-La Mancha and Castile and León demand a higher cognitive level from their students. These aspects determine the heterogeneity in the constructs used, in such a way that neither the same understanding nor the same skills of national historical knowledge are being measured throughout the autonomous regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Pedagogia
Revista Espanola De Pedagogia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The revista española de pedagogía (Spanish Journal of Pedagogy or rep) is one of the oldest journals in the world dealing with pedagogical research. During the several decades it has been published, the revista española de pedagogía has always maintained the highest standards of quality and it has gained international awards. The logo of the journal is a wheel, a symbol that wants to evoke several ideas: creativity and forward motion, the wisdom eye that enters into the knowledge of reality, the sun that radiates knowledge and makes ideas shine more clearly, as well as the globe, the sign of an education that is interested in the society where it belongs. This symbol, together with some other figures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信