以科学为基础的目标治理安全和公正的未来:机遇与局限

IF 3.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Lauren Gifford, Diana Liverman, Joyeeta Gupta, Lisa Jacobson
{"title":"以科学为基础的目标治理安全和公正的未来:机遇与局限","authors":"Lauren Gifford, Diana Liverman, Joyeeta Gupta, Lisa Jacobson","doi":"10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reflects on the work of the Earth Commission and the Global Commons Alliance to include climate and environmental justice in establishing biophysical targets to stabilize the Earth system. Targets include those for global temperature (e.g. 1.5°C), biodiversity (e.g. % protected or natural land), surface and groundwater and nutrient pollution (e.g. phosphorus load). We discuss whether and how to define Earth system justice in relation to planetary targets and related levers of transformation, how we identify measures of what is just, and reflect on whether target setting itself is a neoliberal process. We examine how science can identify targets that subsequently inform policies that may inadvertently increase, rather than decrease, inequalities, such as those associated with neoliberal policies of commodification, privatization, top-down conservation and globalization. Can the operationalization of targets enable deep transformations needed to stabilize the Earth system and ensure just access for all, or will they be used for business as usual? We draw on collaborations with members of the social science working group of the Earth Commission to focus not only on possibilities for just targets but on radical transformations for a safe and just planet where harm is minimized and access to wellbeing is possible for all.","PeriodicalId":47734,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Development","volume":" 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing for a safe and just future with science-based targets: opportunities and limitations\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Gifford, Diana Liverman, Joyeeta Gupta, Lisa Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reflects on the work of the Earth Commission and the Global Commons Alliance to include climate and environmental justice in establishing biophysical targets to stabilize the Earth system. Targets include those for global temperature (e.g. 1.5°C), biodiversity (e.g. % protected or natural land), surface and groundwater and nutrient pollution (e.g. phosphorus load). We discuss whether and how to define Earth system justice in relation to planetary targets and related levers of transformation, how we identify measures of what is just, and reflect on whether target setting itself is a neoliberal process. We examine how science can identify targets that subsequently inform policies that may inadvertently increase, rather than decrease, inequalities, such as those associated with neoliberal policies of commodification, privatization, top-down conservation and globalization. Can the operationalization of targets enable deep transformations needed to stabilize the Earth system and ensure just access for all, or will they be used for business as usual? We draw on collaborations with members of the social science working group of the Earth Commission to focus not only on possibilities for just targets but on radical transformations for a safe and just planet where harm is minimized and access to wellbeing is possible for all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate and Development\",\"volume\":\" 13\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2023.2264255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文反映了地球委员会和全球公地联盟的工作,将气候和环境正义纳入建立生物物理目标以稳定地球系统。目标包括全球温度(例如1.5°C)、生物多样性(例如受保护或自然土地的百分比)、地表水和地下水以及营养物污染(例如磷负荷)。我们将讨论是否以及如何根据行星目标和相关的转型杠杆来定义地球系统正义,我们如何确定正义的衡量标准,并反思目标设定本身是否是一个新自由主义过程。我们研究了科学如何确定目标,这些目标随后为可能无意中增加而不是减少不平等的政策提供信息,例如那些与新自由主义的商品化、私有化、自上而下的保护和全球化政策相关的政策。目标的操作化是否能够实现稳定地球系统所需的深刻转变,并确保所有人都能公正地访问,或者它们将像往常一样被用于商业活动?我们利用与地球委员会社会科学工作组成员的合作,不仅关注公正目标的可能性,而且关注为一个安全公正的星球进行彻底变革的可能性,在这个星球上,危害最小化,所有人都有可能获得幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governing for a safe and just future with science-based targets: opportunities and limitations
This paper reflects on the work of the Earth Commission and the Global Commons Alliance to include climate and environmental justice in establishing biophysical targets to stabilize the Earth system. Targets include those for global temperature (e.g. 1.5°C), biodiversity (e.g. % protected or natural land), surface and groundwater and nutrient pollution (e.g. phosphorus load). We discuss whether and how to define Earth system justice in relation to planetary targets and related levers of transformation, how we identify measures of what is just, and reflect on whether target setting itself is a neoliberal process. We examine how science can identify targets that subsequently inform policies that may inadvertently increase, rather than decrease, inequalities, such as those associated with neoliberal policies of commodification, privatization, top-down conservation and globalization. Can the operationalization of targets enable deep transformations needed to stabilize the Earth system and ensure just access for all, or will they be used for business as usual? We draw on collaborations with members of the social science working group of the Earth Commission to focus not only on possibilities for just targets but on radical transformations for a safe and just planet where harm is minimized and access to wellbeing is possible for all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信