低功耗广域网技术的能效研究

IF 0.2 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Y. V. Lykov, D. Y. Gorelov, A. A. Lykova, S. O. Savenko
{"title":"低功耗广域网技术的能效研究","authors":"Y. V. Lykov, D. Y. Gorelov, A. A. Lykova, S. O. Savenko","doi":"10.15588/1607-3274-2023-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context. The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the development of various low-power wide area network (LPWAN) technologies that are designed to provide transmission of small data packets over long distances with minimal energy consumption. The two most well-known LPWAN technologies are LoRaWAN and Sigfox. This study aims to compare the energy efficiency of these two technologies to determine their suitability for use in autonomous solutions.
 Objective. The objective of this study is to compare the energy efficiency of LoRaWAN and Sigfox technologies for IoT devices. The comparison will help determine which technology is better for autonomous solutions when devices need to operate for extended periods of time without frequent battery replacements.
 Method. In this work, taking into account the specifications of the investigated radio technologies, mathematical modeling of the time of data transmission or reception is used depending on the payload, and information on the power supply current is taken from official datasheets for the components of the investigated devices.
 Results. The results of the study show that both LoRaWAN and Sigfox are energy-saving technologies, but LoRaWAN is generally more energy-efficient than Sigfox. In addition, LoRaWAN has adaptive modes and significantly more manual settings, which in some cases further reduces the energy per bit of data compared to Sigfox.
 Conclusions. LoRaWAN is the best choice for autonomous solutions where energy efficiency is crucial. This study provides valuable information for designers and developers of IoT devices, allowing them to make informed decisions when choosing LPWAN technologies for their autonomous solutions.","PeriodicalId":43783,"journal":{"name":"Radio Electronics Computer Science Control","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENERGY EFFICIENCY RESEARCH OF LPWAN TECHNOLOGIES\",\"authors\":\"Y. V. Lykov, D. Y. Gorelov, A. A. Lykova, S. O. Savenko\",\"doi\":\"10.15588/1607-3274-2023-3-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context. The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the development of various low-power wide area network (LPWAN) technologies that are designed to provide transmission of small data packets over long distances with minimal energy consumption. The two most well-known LPWAN technologies are LoRaWAN and Sigfox. This study aims to compare the energy efficiency of these two technologies to determine their suitability for use in autonomous solutions.
 Objective. The objective of this study is to compare the energy efficiency of LoRaWAN and Sigfox technologies for IoT devices. The comparison will help determine which technology is better for autonomous solutions when devices need to operate for extended periods of time without frequent battery replacements.
 Method. In this work, taking into account the specifications of the investigated radio technologies, mathematical modeling of the time of data transmission or reception is used depending on the payload, and information on the power supply current is taken from official datasheets for the components of the investigated devices.
 Results. The results of the study show that both LoRaWAN and Sigfox are energy-saving technologies, but LoRaWAN is generally more energy-efficient than Sigfox. In addition, LoRaWAN has adaptive modes and significantly more manual settings, which in some cases further reduces the energy per bit of data compared to Sigfox.
 Conclusions. LoRaWAN is the best choice for autonomous solutions where energy efficiency is crucial. This study provides valuable information for designers and developers of IoT devices, allowing them to make informed decisions when choosing LPWAN technologies for their autonomous solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radio Electronics Computer Science Control\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radio Electronics Computer Science Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2023-3-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radio Electronics Computer Science Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2023-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。物联网(IoT)的出现导致了各种低功耗广域网(LPWAN)技术的发展,这些技术旨在以最小的能耗长距离传输小数据包。两种最著名的LPWAN技术是LoRaWAN和Sigfox。本研究旨在比较这两种技术的能源效率,以确定它们在自动驾驶解决方案中的适用性。 目标。本研究的目的是比较LoRaWAN和Sigfox技术用于物联网设备的能源效率。当设备需要长时间运行而不需要频繁更换电池时,这种比较将有助于确定哪种技术更适合自主解决方案。方法。在这项工作中,考虑到所研究的无线电技术的规格,根据有效载荷使用了数据传输或接收时间的数学建模,并且有关电源电流的信息取自所研究设备组件的官方数据表。 结果。研究结果表明,LoRaWAN和Sigfox都是节能技术,但LoRaWAN通常比Sigfox更节能。此外,LoRaWAN具有自适应模式和更多的手动设置,在某些情况下,与Sigfox相比,这进一步降低了每比特数据的能量。结论。对于能源效率至关重要的自动驾驶解决方案来说,LoRaWAN是最佳选择。这项研究为物联网设备的设计人员和开发人员提供了有价值的信息,使他们能够在为其自主解决方案选择LPWAN技术时做出明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ENERGY EFFICIENCY RESEARCH OF LPWAN TECHNOLOGIES
Context. The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the development of various low-power wide area network (LPWAN) technologies that are designed to provide transmission of small data packets over long distances with minimal energy consumption. The two most well-known LPWAN technologies are LoRaWAN and Sigfox. This study aims to compare the energy efficiency of these two technologies to determine their suitability for use in autonomous solutions. Objective. The objective of this study is to compare the energy efficiency of LoRaWAN and Sigfox technologies for IoT devices. The comparison will help determine which technology is better for autonomous solutions when devices need to operate for extended periods of time without frequent battery replacements. Method. In this work, taking into account the specifications of the investigated radio technologies, mathematical modeling of the time of data transmission or reception is used depending on the payload, and information on the power supply current is taken from official datasheets for the components of the investigated devices. Results. The results of the study show that both LoRaWAN and Sigfox are energy-saving technologies, but LoRaWAN is generally more energy-efficient than Sigfox. In addition, LoRaWAN has adaptive modes and significantly more manual settings, which in some cases further reduces the energy per bit of data compared to Sigfox. Conclusions. LoRaWAN is the best choice for autonomous solutions where energy efficiency is crucial. This study provides valuable information for designers and developers of IoT devices, allowing them to make informed decisions when choosing LPWAN technologies for their autonomous solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radio Electronics Computer Science Control
Radio Electronics Computer Science Control COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信