学生阅读理解中高阶思维能力的评估

Ideas Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182
Syah Ibi Hamma, Syamsiarna Nappu, Erwin Akib
{"title":"学生阅读理解中高阶思维能力的评估","authors":"Syah Ibi Hamma, Syamsiarna Nappu, Erwin Akib","doi":"10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to find out the score of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension and the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS. This research used a quantitative descriptive design. The data were obtained by using tests and questionnaires. The subjects of this research were 22 students who studied in the Twelfth Grade IPA 1 in SMA Pesantren IMMIM Makassar. By definition, Higher-Order Thinking is divided into 3 Categories which were Higher-Order Thinking As Transfer (C4), Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5), and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6). The students answered the test and the questions were at the HOTS level. In challenges, this research investigated the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS by analyzing the questionnaire. The findings of this research revealed that the score of students’ HOTS was 64,54% which was considered Good, It shows that students scored Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was 81,8%, while Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was 54,5% and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6) was 9.1%, and as for the challenges faced by students when solving HOTS was 16.63% students facing difficulties in understanding the Meaning of Word (C4), 27.72% facing difficulties in Making Inferences (C5) and 28.81% students facing difficulties in Determining the Main Idea (C6) when solving HOTS Questions. It can be concluded that the student’s Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was Excellent, Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was good and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem-Solving was Poor, and the challenges that the students faced when solving HOTS Questions were mostly determining the main idea and making inference.","PeriodicalId":34645,"journal":{"name":"Ideas","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills In Reading Comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Syah Ibi Hamma, Syamsiarna Nappu, Erwin Akib\",\"doi\":\"10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to find out the score of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension and the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS. This research used a quantitative descriptive design. The data were obtained by using tests and questionnaires. The subjects of this research were 22 students who studied in the Twelfth Grade IPA 1 in SMA Pesantren IMMIM Makassar. By definition, Higher-Order Thinking is divided into 3 Categories which were Higher-Order Thinking As Transfer (C4), Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5), and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6). The students answered the test and the questions were at the HOTS level. In challenges, this research investigated the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS by analyzing the questionnaire. The findings of this research revealed that the score of students’ HOTS was 64,54% which was considered Good, It shows that students scored Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was 81,8%, while Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was 54,5% and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6) was 9.1%, and as for the challenges faced by students when solving HOTS was 16.63% students facing difficulties in understanding the Meaning of Word (C4), 27.72% facing difficulties in Making Inferences (C5) and 28.81% students facing difficulties in Determining the Main Idea (C6) when solving HOTS Questions. It can be concluded that the student’s Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was Excellent, Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was good and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem-Solving was Poor, and the challenges that the students faced when solving HOTS Questions were mostly determining the main idea and making inference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideas\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解学生在阅读理解中高阶思维技能的得分情况,以及学生在解决高阶思维技能时所面临的挑战。本研究采用定量描述设计。数据通过测试和问卷调查获得。本研究的对象为22名就读于望加锡外国语学院(SMA Pesantren IMMIM Makassar) 12年级的学生。根据定义,高阶思维分为3类,即高阶思维作为迁移(C4),高阶思维作为批判性思维(C5)和高阶思维作为问题解决(C6)。学生们回答了测试,问题是在HOTS水平。在挑战方面,本研究通过对问卷的分析,调查了学生在解决HOTS时所面临的挑战。本研究结果显示,学生的HOTS得分为64.54%,被认为是良好的,其中高阶思维为迁移(C4)的学生得分为81.8%,高阶思维为批判性思维(C5)的学生得分为54.5%,高阶思维为问题解决(C6)的学生得分为9.1%,而学生在解决HOTS时面临的挑战为16.63%,学生在理解单词的意义方面存在困难(C4)。27.72%的学生在解决HOTS问题时存在推理困难(C5), 28.81%的学生在解决HOTS问题时存在确定主旨困难(C6)。可以看出,学生的高阶思维作为迁移(C4)是优秀的,高阶思维作为批判性思维(C5)是良好的,高阶思维作为问题解决是差的,学生在解决HOTS问题时面临的挑战主要是确定主旨和进行推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills In Reading Comprehension
This research aimed to find out the score of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension and the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS. This research used a quantitative descriptive design. The data were obtained by using tests and questionnaires. The subjects of this research were 22 students who studied in the Twelfth Grade IPA 1 in SMA Pesantren IMMIM Makassar. By definition, Higher-Order Thinking is divided into 3 Categories which were Higher-Order Thinking As Transfer (C4), Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5), and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6). The students answered the test and the questions were at the HOTS level. In challenges, this research investigated the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS by analyzing the questionnaire. The findings of this research revealed that the score of students’ HOTS was 64,54% which was considered Good, It shows that students scored Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was 81,8%, while Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was 54,5% and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6) was 9.1%, and as for the challenges faced by students when solving HOTS was 16.63% students facing difficulties in understanding the Meaning of Word (C4), 27.72% facing difficulties in Making Inferences (C5) and 28.81% students facing difficulties in Determining the Main Idea (C6) when solving HOTS Questions. It can be concluded that the student’s Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was Excellent, Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was good and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem-Solving was Poor, and the challenges that the students faced when solving HOTS Questions were mostly determining the main idea and making inference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信