分析俄罗斯联邦各组成实体的关税协定:数据呈现的形式和完整性

Q3 Medicine
D. V. Fedyaev, F. S. Nikitin, T. N. Artamonova, S. A. Kovaleva, V. V. Omelyanovskiy
{"title":"分析俄罗斯联邦各组成实体的关税协定:数据呈现的形式和完整性","authors":"D. V. Fedyaev, F. S. Nikitin, T. N. Artamonova, S. A. Kovaleva, V. V. Omelyanovskiy","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Each constituent entity of the Russian Federation (RF) on the basis of the territorial programme of state guarantees of free medical care for citizens forms a tariff agreement (TA) on payment for medical care. Despite the list of requirements to the content and structure of the tariff agreement established by the decree of the Ministry of Health of the RF, there are significant differences among the regional tariff agreements in terms of content and completeness of the information provided. Objective: a comparative analysis of TA of the RF constituent entities and additional agreements to them to identify differences in their structure and content. Material and methods . To carry out the analysis, the data of TA for the full calendar year 2022 were systematised into a single database with the allocation of the main parameters regulated by legal documents. On the basis of the database, the availability and form of information presentation in the TA were analysed. Results. The differences were revealed, which can be divided into two groups. In the first group, they relate to the content and structure of TA; in the second group, to the presentation of TA in public domain. The differences are related to the information content of TA, details of tariffs for medical services, the presence or absence of tariffs for separate medical services, as well as the presentation and formats of TA files on the websites of territorial compulsory health insurance funds. Conclusion. To date, there are still a significant number of differences between TA of the RF constituent entities. The lack of unification in data presentation in the regions increases the risk of errors in comparative analysis, which may ultimately affect the correctness of its results presented to the authorities for decision-making in the health care sector. The new unified form of TA will make it possible to eliminate the above-mentioned differences in content and presentation by bringing the data to a single format.","PeriodicalId":36464,"journal":{"name":"Farmakoekonomika","volume":" 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of tariff agreements of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: form and completeness of data presentation\",\"authors\":\"D. V. Fedyaev, F. S. Nikitin, T. N. Artamonova, S. A. Kovaleva, V. V. Omelyanovskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Each constituent entity of the Russian Federation (RF) on the basis of the territorial programme of state guarantees of free medical care for citizens forms a tariff agreement (TA) on payment for medical care. Despite the list of requirements to the content and structure of the tariff agreement established by the decree of the Ministry of Health of the RF, there are significant differences among the regional tariff agreements in terms of content and completeness of the information provided. Objective: a comparative analysis of TA of the RF constituent entities and additional agreements to them to identify differences in their structure and content. Material and methods . To carry out the analysis, the data of TA for the full calendar year 2022 were systematised into a single database with the allocation of the main parameters regulated by legal documents. On the basis of the database, the availability and form of information presentation in the TA were analysed. Results. The differences were revealed, which can be divided into two groups. In the first group, they relate to the content and structure of TA; in the second group, to the presentation of TA in public domain. The differences are related to the information content of TA, details of tariffs for medical services, the presence or absence of tariffs for separate medical services, as well as the presentation and formats of TA files on the websites of territorial compulsory health insurance funds. Conclusion. To date, there are still a significant number of differences between TA of the RF constituent entities. The lack of unification in data presentation in the regions increases the risk of errors in comparative analysis, which may ultimately affect the correctness of its results presented to the authorities for decision-making in the health care sector. The new unified form of TA will make it possible to eliminate the above-mentioned differences in content and presentation by bringing the data to a single format.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmakoekonomika\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmakoekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmakoekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。俄罗斯联邦各组成实体根据国家保障公民免费医疗的领土方案,就医疗费用支付达成关税协定。尽管南斯拉夫联邦共和国卫生部的法令规定了关税协定的内容和结构要求清单,但各区域关税协定之间在所提供信息的内容和完整性方面存在重大差异。目的:比较分析RF组成实体的TA及其附加协议,以确定其结构和内容的差异。材料和方法。为了进行分析,将2022年全年的TA数据系统化到一个数据库中,主要参数的分配由法律文件规定。在数据库的基础上,分析了TA的可用性和信息表示形式。结果。差异被揭示出来,可以分为两组。在第一组中,它们与助教的内容和结构有关;在第二组中,TA在公共领域的呈现。这些差异与TA的信息内容、医疗服务关税细节、单独医疗服务是否征收关税以及领土强制性健康保险基金网站上TA文件的呈现方式和格式有关。结论。迄今为止,TA和RF组成实体之间仍然存在大量差异。各区域在数据呈现方面缺乏统一,增加了比较分析出错的风险,这可能最终影响其提交给保健部门决策当局的结果的正确性。新的、统一的数据交换格式将使数据采用单一格式,从而消除上述在内容和表示方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of tariff agreements of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: form and completeness of data presentation
Background. Each constituent entity of the Russian Federation (RF) on the basis of the territorial programme of state guarantees of free medical care for citizens forms a tariff agreement (TA) on payment for medical care. Despite the list of requirements to the content and structure of the tariff agreement established by the decree of the Ministry of Health of the RF, there are significant differences among the regional tariff agreements in terms of content and completeness of the information provided. Objective: a comparative analysis of TA of the RF constituent entities and additional agreements to them to identify differences in their structure and content. Material and methods . To carry out the analysis, the data of TA for the full calendar year 2022 were systematised into a single database with the allocation of the main parameters regulated by legal documents. On the basis of the database, the availability and form of information presentation in the TA were analysed. Results. The differences were revealed, which can be divided into two groups. In the first group, they relate to the content and structure of TA; in the second group, to the presentation of TA in public domain. The differences are related to the information content of TA, details of tariffs for medical services, the presence or absence of tariffs for separate medical services, as well as the presentation and formats of TA files on the websites of territorial compulsory health insurance funds. Conclusion. To date, there are still a significant number of differences between TA of the RF constituent entities. The lack of unification in data presentation in the regions increases the risk of errors in comparative analysis, which may ultimately affect the correctness of its results presented to the authorities for decision-making in the health care sector. The new unified form of TA will make it possible to eliminate the above-mentioned differences in content and presentation by bringing the data to a single format.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Farmakoekonomika
Farmakoekonomika Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信