美国南部大平原边界层辐合线及相关上升气流的观测

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Shanhe Liu, Kapil D. Sindhu, Daniel J. Kirshbaum
{"title":"美国南部大平原边界层辐合线及相关上升气流的观测","authors":"Shanhe Liu, Kapil D. Sindhu, Daniel J. Kirshbaum","doi":"10.1175/jas-d-23-0089.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Boundary-layer convergence lines (CLs) are highly effective at deep-convection initiation (DCI), suggesting that their associated updraft properties differ from those of more widespread turbulent updrafts in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). This study exploits observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains (ARM-SGP) observatory in Oklahoma from 2011-2016 to quantify CL properties and their relation to turbulent PBL eddies preceding CL arrival. Two independent methods for estimating CL properties are developed at two locations in the SGP region, both relying on the assumption of a 2D circulation in the CL-normal plane but using different combinations of instruments. The first (the radar method) relies mainly on scanning radar data and is applied to 61 CLs passing near a high-resolution scanning radar based in Nardin, OK, while the second (the surface method) relies mainly on surface wind data and is applied to 68 CLs crossing the SGP facility in nearby Lamont, OK. Mean daytime (10:00-19:00 LST) CL width (∼2 km) and convergence magnitude (∼0.003 s−1) are similar for both methods, and mean daytime CL depth is ∼ 0.75 km. The two methods disagree at night (00:00-10:00 LST and 19:00-24:00 LST), where the surface method estimates wider and weaker CLs than the radar method. This difference may stem from the radar beam overshooting the shallow, highly stable nocturnal PBL. The largest CL updrafts are slightly wider (∼ 20%) and stronger (∼ 40%) than the largest PBL updrafts in the pre-CL period, generating 50-100% larger updraft mass fluxes over most of the PBL depth.","PeriodicalId":17231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"76 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations of boundary-layer convergence lines and associated updrafts in the US Southern Great Plains\",\"authors\":\"Shanhe Liu, Kapil D. Sindhu, Daniel J. Kirshbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jas-d-23-0089.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Boundary-layer convergence lines (CLs) are highly effective at deep-convection initiation (DCI), suggesting that their associated updraft properties differ from those of more widespread turbulent updrafts in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). This study exploits observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains (ARM-SGP) observatory in Oklahoma from 2011-2016 to quantify CL properties and their relation to turbulent PBL eddies preceding CL arrival. Two independent methods for estimating CL properties are developed at two locations in the SGP region, both relying on the assumption of a 2D circulation in the CL-normal plane but using different combinations of instruments. The first (the radar method) relies mainly on scanning radar data and is applied to 61 CLs passing near a high-resolution scanning radar based in Nardin, OK, while the second (the surface method) relies mainly on surface wind data and is applied to 68 CLs crossing the SGP facility in nearby Lamont, OK. Mean daytime (10:00-19:00 LST) CL width (∼2 km) and convergence magnitude (∼0.003 s−1) are similar for both methods, and mean daytime CL depth is ∼ 0.75 km. The two methods disagree at night (00:00-10:00 LST and 19:00-24:00 LST), where the surface method estimates wider and weaker CLs than the radar method. This difference may stem from the radar beam overshooting the shallow, highly stable nocturnal PBL. The largest CL updrafts are slightly wider (∼ 20%) and stronger (∼ 40%) than the largest PBL updrafts in the pre-CL period, generating 50-100% larger updraft mass fluxes over most of the PBL depth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences\",\"volume\":\"76 11-12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-23-0089.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-23-0089.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

边界层辐合线(CLs)在深层对流起始(DCI)中非常有效,表明其相关的上升气流特性不同于行星边界层(PBL)中更广泛的湍流上升气流。本研究利用俄克拉何马州大气辐射测量南部大平原(ARM-SGP)天文台2011-2016年的观测数据,量化了CL的性质及其与CL到达前湍流PBL漩涡的关系。在SGP区域的两个位置开发了两种独立的CL性质估计方法,两者都依赖于CL法向平面的二维循环假设,但使用不同的仪器组合。第一种方法(雷达方法)主要依赖于扫描雷达数据,并应用于通过位于Nardin的高分辨率扫描雷达附近的61个CLs,而第二种方法(地面方法)主要依赖于地面风数据,并应用于通过位于Lamont附近的SGP设施的68个CLs。两种方法的平均日间(LST 10:00-19:00) CL宽度(~ 2 km)和辐合幅度(~ 0.003 s−1)相似,平均日间CL深度为~ 0.75 km。两种方法在夜间(00:00-10:00 LST和19:00-24:00 LST)不一致,地面方法估计的CLs比雷达方法更宽、更弱。这种差异可能是由于雷达波束超过了浅的、高度稳定的夜间边界层。最大的CL上升气流比CL前时期最大的PBL上升气流略宽(~ 20%)和强(~ 40%),在PBL大部分深度上产生的上升气流质量通量要大50-100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observations of boundary-layer convergence lines and associated updrafts in the US Southern Great Plains
Abstract Boundary-layer convergence lines (CLs) are highly effective at deep-convection initiation (DCI), suggesting that their associated updraft properties differ from those of more widespread turbulent updrafts in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). This study exploits observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains (ARM-SGP) observatory in Oklahoma from 2011-2016 to quantify CL properties and their relation to turbulent PBL eddies preceding CL arrival. Two independent methods for estimating CL properties are developed at two locations in the SGP region, both relying on the assumption of a 2D circulation in the CL-normal plane but using different combinations of instruments. The first (the radar method) relies mainly on scanning radar data and is applied to 61 CLs passing near a high-resolution scanning radar based in Nardin, OK, while the second (the surface method) relies mainly on surface wind data and is applied to 68 CLs crossing the SGP facility in nearby Lamont, OK. Mean daytime (10:00-19:00 LST) CL width (∼2 km) and convergence magnitude (∼0.003 s−1) are similar for both methods, and mean daytime CL depth is ∼ 0.75 km. The two methods disagree at night (00:00-10:00 LST and 19:00-24:00 LST), where the surface method estimates wider and weaker CLs than the radar method. This difference may stem from the radar beam overshooting the shallow, highly stable nocturnal PBL. The largest CL updrafts are slightly wider (∼ 20%) and stronger (∼ 40%) than the largest PBL updrafts in the pre-CL period, generating 50-100% larger updraft mass fluxes over most of the PBL depth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (JAS) publishes basic research related to the physics, dynamics, and chemistry of the atmosphere of Earth and other planets, with emphasis on the quantitative and deductive aspects of the subject. The links provide detailed information for readers, authors, reviewers, and those who wish to submit a manuscript for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信