{"title":"托马斯·庞格尔对亚里士多德《生物学》的新伊壁鸠鲁主义解读","authors":"Marco Andreacchio","doi":"10.61439/dnga7340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his 2020 reading of Aristotle’s biology, “A Synoptic Introduction to the Ontological Background of Aristotle’s Political Theory,” Thomas L. Pangle (2020) speaks de facto on behalf of contemporary Neo-Epicureanism. For Pangle reads Aristotle by way of advancing the cause of an Epicurean use of Plato. Proposing to liberate Aristotle from a 2,400 year-old Platonic tradition having allegedly unduly minimized the importance of biology in understanding both ontology and politics, Pangle argues for fundamental compatibility between the Stagirite and Darwinian evolutionism. The present article offers strong reasons to reject Pangle's central contentions.","PeriodicalId":493693,"journal":{"name":"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thomas Pangle’s Neo-Epicurean Reading of Aristotle’s Biology\",\"authors\":\"Marco Andreacchio\",\"doi\":\"10.61439/dnga7340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his 2020 reading of Aristotle’s biology, “A Synoptic Introduction to the Ontological Background of Aristotle’s Political Theory,” Thomas L. Pangle (2020) speaks de facto on behalf of contemporary Neo-Epicureanism. For Pangle reads Aristotle by way of advancing the cause of an Epicurean use of Plato. Proposing to liberate Aristotle from a 2,400 year-old Platonic tradition having allegedly unduly minimized the importance of biology in understanding both ontology and politics, Pangle argues for fundamental compatibility between the Stagirite and Darwinian evolutionism. The present article offers strong reasons to reject Pangle's central contentions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":493693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61439/dnga7340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61439/dnga7340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Thomas L. Pangle(2020)在他2020年对亚里士多德生物学的阅读《亚里士多德政治理论的本体论背景概论导论》中,实际上代表了当代新伊壁鸠鲁主义。因为庞格勒读亚里士多德,是为了推进伊壁鸠鲁派对柏拉图的运用。Pangle主张将亚里士多德从2400年的柏拉图主义传统中解放出来,因为柏拉图主义在理解本体论和政治方面过分低估了生物学的重要性。本文提供了强有力的理由来驳斥庞格勒的核心论点。
Thomas Pangle’s Neo-Epicurean Reading of Aristotle’s Biology
In his 2020 reading of Aristotle’s biology, “A Synoptic Introduction to the Ontological Background of Aristotle’s Political Theory,” Thomas L. Pangle (2020) speaks de facto on behalf of contemporary Neo-Epicureanism. For Pangle reads Aristotle by way of advancing the cause of an Epicurean use of Plato. Proposing to liberate Aristotle from a 2,400 year-old Platonic tradition having allegedly unduly minimized the importance of biology in understanding both ontology and politics, Pangle argues for fundamental compatibility between the Stagirite and Darwinian evolutionism. The present article offers strong reasons to reject Pangle's central contentions.