托马斯·庞格尔对亚里士多德《生物学》的新伊壁鸠鲁主义解读

Marco Andreacchio
{"title":"托马斯·庞格尔对亚里士多德《生物学》的新伊壁鸠鲁主义解读","authors":"Marco Andreacchio","doi":"10.61439/dnga7340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his 2020 reading of Aristotle’s biology, “A Synoptic Introduction to the Ontological Background of Aristotle’s Political Theory,” Thomas L. Pangle (2020) speaks de facto on behalf of contemporary Neo-Epicureanism. For Pangle reads Aristotle by way of advancing the cause of an Epicurean use of Plato. Proposing to liberate Aristotle from a 2,400 year-old Platonic tradition having allegedly unduly minimized the importance of biology in understanding both ontology and politics, Pangle argues for fundamental compatibility between the Stagirite and Darwinian evolutionism. The present article offers strong reasons to reject Pangle's central contentions.","PeriodicalId":493693,"journal":{"name":"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thomas Pangle’s Neo-Epicurean Reading of Aristotle’s Biology\",\"authors\":\"Marco Andreacchio\",\"doi\":\"10.61439/dnga7340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his 2020 reading of Aristotle’s biology, “A Synoptic Introduction to the Ontological Background of Aristotle’s Political Theory,” Thomas L. Pangle (2020) speaks de facto on behalf of contemporary Neo-Epicureanism. For Pangle reads Aristotle by way of advancing the cause of an Epicurean use of Plato. Proposing to liberate Aristotle from a 2,400 year-old Platonic tradition having allegedly unduly minimized the importance of biology in understanding both ontology and politics, Pangle argues for fundamental compatibility between the Stagirite and Darwinian evolutionism. The present article offers strong reasons to reject Pangle's central contentions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":493693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61439/dnga7340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology Criminology Philosophy and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61439/dnga7340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Thomas L. Pangle(2020)在他2020年对亚里士多德生物学的阅读《亚里士多德政治理论的本体论背景概论导论》中,实际上代表了当代新伊壁鸠鲁主义。因为庞格勒读亚里士多德,是为了推进伊壁鸠鲁派对柏拉图的运用。Pangle主张将亚里士多德从2400年的柏拉图主义传统中解放出来,因为柏拉图主义在理解本体论和政治方面过分低估了生物学的重要性。本文提供了强有力的理由来驳斥庞格勒的核心论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thomas Pangle’s Neo-Epicurean Reading of Aristotle’s Biology
In his 2020 reading of Aristotle’s biology, “A Synoptic Introduction to the Ontological Background of Aristotle’s Political Theory,” Thomas L. Pangle (2020) speaks de facto on behalf of contemporary Neo-Epicureanism. For Pangle reads Aristotle by way of advancing the cause of an Epicurean use of Plato. Proposing to liberate Aristotle from a 2,400 year-old Platonic tradition having allegedly unduly minimized the importance of biology in understanding both ontology and politics, Pangle argues for fundamental compatibility between the Stagirite and Darwinian evolutionism. The present article offers strong reasons to reject Pangle's central contentions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信