用三种不同的方法对朝鲜半岛地震目录进行分类比较

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sung Kyun Kim
{"title":"用三种不同的方法对朝鲜半岛地震目录进行分类比较","authors":"Sung Kyun Kim","doi":"10.4401/ag-8965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earthquake catalogs include dependent earthquakes, which are spatiotemporally related, and independent or background earthquakes. In order to predict long-term seismicity or conduct a seismic hazard assessment, the dependent earthquakes must be removed to generate a declustered earthquake catalog. Several declustering methods have been proposed to date; however, the result of seismic hazard assessment may vary depending on which declustering methods are selected. In the present study, the catalog of earthquakes that were observed between 2016 and 2021 in and around the Korean Peninsula is declustered using the methods proposed by Gardner and Knopoff [1974], Reasenberg [1985], and Zhuang et al. [2002], and the resultant catalogs are compared. The seismicity parameters (a- and b-values) in the Gutenberg-Richter relationship are found to vary among the three declustered catalogs, thus affecting long-term earthquake predictions and seismic hazard assessment. The raw (original) and three declustered catalogs are also tested to see whether they follow the Poisson process. The minimum magnitude ( ) above which the null hypothesis of the Poisson process cannot be rejected in the earthquake catalogs ranges from 1.6 to 2.2, depending on the declustered catalog. Further, the obtained herein shows a large value compared to the completeness magnitude estimated in the present study. Comparing the curves representing the cumulative number of background earthquakes against the elapsed time for the declustered catalogs shows that the method by Zhuang et al. [2002] produces the result in the closest agreement with the real background seismicity curve.","PeriodicalId":50766,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geophysics","volume":" 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of earthquake catalogs for the Korean Peninsula declustered using three different methods\",\"authors\":\"Sung Kyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4401/ag-8965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Earthquake catalogs include dependent earthquakes, which are spatiotemporally related, and independent or background earthquakes. In order to predict long-term seismicity or conduct a seismic hazard assessment, the dependent earthquakes must be removed to generate a declustered earthquake catalog. Several declustering methods have been proposed to date; however, the result of seismic hazard assessment may vary depending on which declustering methods are selected. In the present study, the catalog of earthquakes that were observed between 2016 and 2021 in and around the Korean Peninsula is declustered using the methods proposed by Gardner and Knopoff [1974], Reasenberg [1985], and Zhuang et al. [2002], and the resultant catalogs are compared. The seismicity parameters (a- and b-values) in the Gutenberg-Richter relationship are found to vary among the three declustered catalogs, thus affecting long-term earthquake predictions and seismic hazard assessment. The raw (original) and three declustered catalogs are also tested to see whether they follow the Poisson process. The minimum magnitude ( ) above which the null hypothesis of the Poisson process cannot be rejected in the earthquake catalogs ranges from 1.6 to 2.2, depending on the declustered catalog. Further, the obtained herein shows a large value compared to the completeness magnitude estimated in the present study. Comparing the curves representing the cumulative number of background earthquakes against the elapsed time for the declustered catalogs shows that the method by Zhuang et al. [2002] produces the result in the closest agreement with the real background seismicity curve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Geophysics\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地震目录包括时空相关的依赖地震和独立地震或背景地震。为了预测长期的地震活动性或进行地震危险性评估,必须去除相关地震以生成分集地震目录。目前已经提出了几种聚类方法;然而,不同的聚类方法可能会导致地震危险性评估的结果不同。在本研究中,采用Gardner and Knopoff[1974]、Reasenberg[1985]和Zhuang等[2002]提出的方法对朝鲜半岛及其周边地区2016年至2021年观测到的地震目录进行了分类,并对所得目录进行了比较。发现古腾堡-里希特关系中的地震活动性参数(a-值和b值)在三个散类目录中有所不同,从而影响长期地震预测和地震危险性评估。原始的(原始的)和三个分离的星表也被测试,看它们是否遵循泊松过程。在地震目录中,泊松过程的零假设不能被拒绝的最小震级()的范围从1.6到2.2,取决于分散的目录。此外,与本研究中估计的完备程度相比,本文获得的结果显示出较大的值。将表示背景地震累积次数的曲线与聚类目录的经过时间进行比较表明,庄等人[2002]的方法产生的结果与实际背景地震活动曲线最接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of earthquake catalogs for the Korean Peninsula declustered using three different methods
Earthquake catalogs include dependent earthquakes, which are spatiotemporally related, and independent or background earthquakes. In order to predict long-term seismicity or conduct a seismic hazard assessment, the dependent earthquakes must be removed to generate a declustered earthquake catalog. Several declustering methods have been proposed to date; however, the result of seismic hazard assessment may vary depending on which declustering methods are selected. In the present study, the catalog of earthquakes that were observed between 2016 and 2021 in and around the Korean Peninsula is declustered using the methods proposed by Gardner and Knopoff [1974], Reasenberg [1985], and Zhuang et al. [2002], and the resultant catalogs are compared. The seismicity parameters (a- and b-values) in the Gutenberg-Richter relationship are found to vary among the three declustered catalogs, thus affecting long-term earthquake predictions and seismic hazard assessment. The raw (original) and three declustered catalogs are also tested to see whether they follow the Poisson process. The minimum magnitude ( ) above which the null hypothesis of the Poisson process cannot be rejected in the earthquake catalogs ranges from 1.6 to 2.2, depending on the declustered catalog. Further, the obtained herein shows a large value compared to the completeness magnitude estimated in the present study. Comparing the curves representing the cumulative number of background earthquakes against the elapsed time for the declustered catalogs shows that the method by Zhuang et al. [2002] produces the result in the closest agreement with the real background seismicity curve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Geophysics
Annals of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Geophysics is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online journal. Annals of Geophysics welcomes contributions on primary research on Seismology, Geodesy, Volcanology, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Oceanography and Climatology, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, Geodynamics and Tectonophysics, Physics and Chemistry of the Atmosphere. It provides: -Open-access, freely accessible online (authors retain copyright) -Fast publication times -Peer review by expert, practicing researchers -Free of charge publication -Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact -Worldwide media coverage. Annals of Geophysics is published by Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), nonprofit public research institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信