ՄԻՋնՈՐդՈՒթյՈՒնները հ քրեական դատավաՐՈՒթյան նՈՐ օրենսԳՐՔՈՒՄ

KARAPET SMBATYAN
{"title":"ՄԻՋնՈՐդՈՒթյՈՒնները հ քրեական դատավաՐՈՒթյան նՈՐ օրենսԳՐՔՈՒՄ","authors":"KARAPET SMBATYAN","doi":"10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are some new institutions and regulations in the Criminal Proceeding Code of The Republic of Armenia which have been adopted by Parliament, including about requests. An object of the work is to demonstrate incomplete sides of new regulations on requests in detail, especially on definition, reaction deadline on requests which are addressed to prosecutor about not charging, sanity of always answering to requests with decisions, and regulations on requests in previous Criminal Proceeding Code and other countries criminal proceeding experiences. An aim of the work is to propose possible solutions to the problems that have been showed. The work is introduced in principles of historical and comparative analyses as well as showing contemporary problems. We think that it is succeeded in referring to the actual problems and its solutions of The New Criminal Proceeding Code on requests and regulations on requests in previous Criminal Proceeding Codes and and other countries criminal proceeding experiences.","PeriodicalId":174588,"journal":{"name":"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ՄԻՋՆՈՐԴՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐԸ ՀՀ ՔՐԵԱԿԱՆ ԴԱՏԱՎԱՐՈՒԹՅԱՆ ՆՈՐ ՕՐԵՆՍԳՐՔՈՒՄ\",\"authors\":\"KARAPET SMBATYAN\",\"doi\":\"10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are some new institutions and regulations in the Criminal Proceeding Code of The Republic of Armenia which have been adopted by Parliament, including about requests. An object of the work is to demonstrate incomplete sides of new regulations on requests in detail, especially on definition, reaction deadline on requests which are addressed to prosecutor about not charging, sanity of always answering to requests with decisions, and regulations on requests in previous Criminal Proceeding Code and other countries criminal proceeding experiences. An aim of the work is to propose possible solutions to the problems that have been showed. The work is introduced in principles of historical and comparative analyses as well as showing contemporary problems. We think that it is succeeded in referring to the actual problems and its solutions of The New Criminal Proceeding Code on requests and regulations on requests in previous Criminal Proceeding Codes and and other countries criminal proceeding experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

议会通过的《亚美尼亚共和国刑事诉讼法》中有一些新的制度和条例,包括关于请求的规定。这项工作的一个目的是详细说明关于请求的新条例的不完整方面,特别是关于定义、对向检察官提出的关于不起诉的请求作出反应的最后期限、总是以决定答复请求的理智、以及以前的《刑事诉讼法》和其他国家刑事诉讼经验中关于请求的规定。这项工作的目的之一是为已经显示的问题提出可能的解决方案。这项工作介绍了历史和比较分析的原则,并展示了当代问题。我们认为,它成功地借鉴了《新刑事诉讼法》在请求权问题上的实际问题及其解决办法和以往刑事诉讼法中关于请求权的规定以及其他国家的刑事诉讼经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ՄԻՋՆՈՐԴՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐԸ ՀՀ ՔՐԵԱԿԱՆ ԴԱՏԱՎԱՐՈՒԹՅԱՆ ՆՈՐ ՕՐԵՆՍԳՐՔՈՒՄ
There are some new institutions and regulations in the Criminal Proceeding Code of The Republic of Armenia which have been adopted by Parliament, including about requests. An object of the work is to demonstrate incomplete sides of new regulations on requests in detail, especially on definition, reaction deadline on requests which are addressed to prosecutor about not charging, sanity of always answering to requests with decisions, and regulations on requests in previous Criminal Proceeding Code and other countries criminal proceeding experiences. An aim of the work is to propose possible solutions to the problems that have been showed. The work is introduced in principles of historical and comparative analyses as well as showing contemporary problems. We think that it is succeeded in referring to the actual problems and its solutions of The New Criminal Proceeding Code on requests and regulations on requests in previous Criminal Proceeding Codes and and other countries criminal proceeding experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信