抗议与选举参与之间的关系:解释智利的例外论

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Rodrigo M. Medel, Nicolás M. Somma, Sofía Donoso
{"title":"抗议与选举参与之间的关系:解释智利的例外论","authors":"Rodrigo M. Medel, Nicolás M. Somma, Sofía Donoso","doi":"10.1017/s0022216x23000706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The literature on political participation has consistently found that protest positively and significantly correlates with voting. However, Chile can be considered a deviant case to this pattern. During the last decade, Chileans who participated in street demonstrations were unlikely to participate in elections. What explains this anomaly? We argue that this rupture between participation in protest and in elections results from an effective distancing between social-movement organisations (SMOs) and institutional politics. However, this distancing of SMOs from party politics has not been homogeneous. To examine this heterogeneity, we conduct a comparative design of two cases: the labour and student movements. Based on a mixed-methods study that combines interviews with movement leaders and surveys of protest participants in marches, we seek to highlight the mediating role of SMOs in the promotion of different forms of political participation.","PeriodicalId":51630,"journal":{"name":"拉丁美洲研究","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nexus between Protest and Electoral Participation: Explaining Chile's Exceptionalism\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo M. Medel, Nicolás M. Somma, Sofía Donoso\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0022216x23000706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The literature on political participation has consistently found that protest positively and significantly correlates with voting. However, Chile can be considered a deviant case to this pattern. During the last decade, Chileans who participated in street demonstrations were unlikely to participate in elections. What explains this anomaly? We argue that this rupture between participation in protest and in elections results from an effective distancing between social-movement organisations (SMOs) and institutional politics. However, this distancing of SMOs from party politics has not been homogeneous. To examine this heterogeneity, we conduct a comparative design of two cases: the labour and student movements. Based on a mixed-methods study that combines interviews with movement leaders and surveys of protest participants in marches, we seek to highlight the mediating role of SMOs in the promotion of different forms of political participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"拉丁美洲研究\",\"volume\":\"188 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"拉丁美洲研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x23000706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"拉丁美洲研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x23000706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关政治参与的文献一致发现,抗议与投票呈显著正相关。然而,智利可以被认为是这种模式的一个例外。在过去十年中,参加街头示威的智利人不太可能参加选举。如何解释这种反常现象?我们认为,参与抗议和参加选举之间的这种断裂是由于社会运动组织(SMOs)和制度政治之间的有效距离。然而,SMOs与政党政治的这种距离并不是同质的。为了检验这种异质性,我们对两个案例进行了比较设计:劳工运动和学生运动。基于一项混合方法研究,结合了对运动领导人的采访和对游行抗议参与者的调查,我们试图强调SMOs在促进不同形式的政治参与方面的中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Nexus between Protest and Electoral Participation: Explaining Chile's Exceptionalism
Abstract The literature on political participation has consistently found that protest positively and significantly correlates with voting. However, Chile can be considered a deviant case to this pattern. During the last decade, Chileans who participated in street demonstrations were unlikely to participate in elections. What explains this anomaly? We argue that this rupture between participation in protest and in elections results from an effective distancing between social-movement organisations (SMOs) and institutional politics. However, this distancing of SMOs from party politics has not been homogeneous. To examine this heterogeneity, we conduct a comparative design of two cases: the labour and student movements. Based on a mixed-methods study that combines interviews with movement leaders and surveys of protest participants in marches, we seek to highlight the mediating role of SMOs in the promotion of different forms of political participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
拉丁美洲研究
拉丁美洲研究 Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3870
期刊介绍: Journal of Latin American Studies presents recent research in the field of Latin American studies in economics, geography, politics, international relations, sociology, social anthropology, economic history and cultural history. Regular features include articles on contemporary themes, specially commissioned commentaries and an extensive section of book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信