学术宏观经济学与货币政策:基于1976 - 2016年联邦公开市场委员会会议记录的主题建模

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
Murat Bakeev
{"title":"学术宏观经济学与货币政策:基于1976 - 2016年联邦公开市场委员会会议记录的主题建模","authors":"Murat Bakeev","doi":"10.4000/oeconomia.15513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the place of academic macroeconomics discourse in the discussions of monetary policy makers, using the transcripts of meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) from 1976 to 2016. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is used to separate the transcripts into topics of discussion. The article shows that policy makers with a PhD in economics contributed more to the discussion of econometric models and theoretical frameworks. At the same time, they were not inclined to discuss issues of monetary policy credibility to a greater extent. Having received a PhD from a “freshwater” or a “saltwater” school of macroeconomics was found to not be linked with a greater or lesser contribution to the discussion of the “academic” topics. This article’s findings support the existing evidence for the growing link between academia and central banks, demonstrating an increase in the discussion of econometric models and theoretical frameworks in recent decades.","PeriodicalId":43377,"journal":{"name":"Oeconomia-History Methodology Philosophy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Macroeconomics and Monetary Policy: Topic Modeling Based on Transcripts of the Meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee from 1976 to 2016\",\"authors\":\"Murat Bakeev\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/oeconomia.15513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the place of academic macroeconomics discourse in the discussions of monetary policy makers, using the transcripts of meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) from 1976 to 2016. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is used to separate the transcripts into topics of discussion. The article shows that policy makers with a PhD in economics contributed more to the discussion of econometric models and theoretical frameworks. At the same time, they were not inclined to discuss issues of monetary policy credibility to a greater extent. Having received a PhD from a “freshwater” or a “saltwater” school of macroeconomics was found to not be linked with a greater or lesser contribution to the discussion of the “academic” topics. This article’s findings support the existing evidence for the growing link between academia and central banks, demonstrating an increase in the discussion of econometric models and theoretical frameworks in recent decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oeconomia-History Methodology Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oeconomia-History Methodology Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.15513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oeconomia-History Methodology Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.15513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用1976年至2016年联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)会议记录,探讨了学术宏观经济学话语在货币政策制定者讨论中的地位。潜狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)用于将转录本划分为讨论主题。文章表明,具有经济学博士学位的政策制定者对计量经济学模型和理论框架的讨论贡献更大。与此同时,他们不倾向于在更大程度上讨论货币政策可信度问题。研究发现,从“淡水”或“咸水”宏观经济学学院获得博士学位与对“学术”主题的讨论或多或少的贡献无关。本文的研究结果支持了学术界与央行之间联系日益密切的现有证据,表明近几十年来对计量经济学模型和理论框架的讨论有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic Macroeconomics and Monetary Policy: Topic Modeling Based on Transcripts of the Meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee from 1976 to 2016
This article explores the place of academic macroeconomics discourse in the discussions of monetary policy makers, using the transcripts of meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) from 1976 to 2016. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is used to separate the transcripts into topics of discussion. The article shows that policy makers with a PhD in economics contributed more to the discussion of econometric models and theoretical frameworks. At the same time, they were not inclined to discuss issues of monetary policy credibility to a greater extent. Having received a PhD from a “freshwater” or a “saltwater” school of macroeconomics was found to not be linked with a greater or lesser contribution to the discussion of the “academic” topics. This article’s findings support the existing evidence for the growing link between academia and central banks, demonstrating an increase in the discussion of econometric models and theoretical frameworks in recent decades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信