国际标准与原则,国外侦查阶段司法控制的立法经验

IF 0.3
Arstan Akhpanov, Erkin Ongarbaev, Aslan Tukiev, Madeniyet Omarbekova, Maya Kulbaeva
{"title":"国际标准与原则,国外侦查阶段司法控制的立法经验","authors":"Arstan Akhpanov, Erkin Ongarbaev, Aslan Tukiev, Madeniyet Omarbekova, Maya Kulbaeva","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The article develops the idea of the need to implement the norms of international legal acts into national legislation, borrowing positive foreign experience in implementing the norms regulating judicial control. At the same time, it is noted that the introduction of international standards and principles into national legal mechanisms is possible only taking into account the peculiarities of the legal system and the legal system of the state.
 
 Theoretical framework: A selective analysis of the implementation of judicial control in foreign countries (France, Germany, Austria, etc.) was carried out, similarities and differences from a similar system in the Republic of Kazakhstan were revealed. The author, exploring the control powers of the court at the international level, tried to determine the importance of international standards and principles in ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
 
 Method: In the course of the research, a set of the following special methods was used: system-structural, formal-legal and logical analysis of the problem; expert assessment of the relevant norms of national legislation and practice of its application; interpretation of legal norms; comparative legal research; constructive-critical analysis of conceptual approaches to the problems under study; legal modeling of risks and costs of election as a prosecutor and the authorization by the investigating judge of measures of criminal procedural coercion.
 
 Results and conclusion: Based on the comparative legal study of the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of Kazakhstan, France, Germany, England, Italy and Spain, it seems possible to note that judicial control has both similar and distinctive features. What unites these or other models is that the main purpose of judicial control is the protection, protection and restoration of the rights and freedoms of subjects of legal relations at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process.
 
 Originality and value: One of the important signs of the rule of law, the construction of which is proclaimed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, is the exercise of judicial control over the preliminary investigation. Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) adhere to this vector of development of criminal procedure legislation. Currently, international standards and principles governing the protection, protection, restoration of human rights and freedoms accumulate the most progressive, successfully tested legal concepts, which were the natural result of the tendency to strengthen guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings. The article is devoted to the problems of legal regulation of judicial control at the stage of preliminary investigation related to compliance with international standards.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"68 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Standards and Principles, Foreign Legislative Experience of Judicial Control in the Investigation Stage\",\"authors\":\"Arstan Akhpanov, Erkin Ongarbaev, Aslan Tukiev, Madeniyet Omarbekova, Maya Kulbaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The article develops the idea of the need to implement the norms of international legal acts into national legislation, borrowing positive foreign experience in implementing the norms regulating judicial control. At the same time, it is noted that the introduction of international standards and principles into national legal mechanisms is possible only taking into account the peculiarities of the legal system and the legal system of the state.
 
 Theoretical framework: A selective analysis of the implementation of judicial control in foreign countries (France, Germany, Austria, etc.) was carried out, similarities and differences from a similar system in the Republic of Kazakhstan were revealed. The author, exploring the control powers of the court at the international level, tried to determine the importance of international standards and principles in ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
 
 Method: In the course of the research, a set of the following special methods was used: system-structural, formal-legal and logical analysis of the problem; expert assessment of the relevant norms of national legislation and practice of its application; interpretation of legal norms; comparative legal research; constructive-critical analysis of conceptual approaches to the problems under study; legal modeling of risks and costs of election as a prosecutor and the authorization by the investigating judge of measures of criminal procedural coercion.
 
 Results and conclusion: Based on the comparative legal study of the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of Kazakhstan, France, Germany, England, Italy and Spain, it seems possible to note that judicial control has both similar and distinctive features. What unites these or other models is that the main purpose of judicial control is the protection, protection and restoration of the rights and freedoms of subjects of legal relations at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process.
 
 Originality and value: One of the important signs of the rule of law, the construction of which is proclaimed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, is the exercise of judicial control over the preliminary investigation. Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) adhere to this vector of development of criminal procedure legislation. Currently, international standards and principles governing the protection, protection, restoration of human rights and freedoms accumulate the most progressive, successfully tested legal concepts, which were the natural result of the tendency to strengthen guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings. The article is devoted to the problems of legal regulation of judicial control at the stage of preliminary investigation related to compliance with international standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"68 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:借鉴国外实施规制司法控制的规范的积极经验,提出将国际法律行为规范纳入国家立法的必要性。同时,需要指出的是,只有考虑到法律制度和国家法律制度的特点,才有可能将国际标准和原则引入国家法律机制。& # x0D;理论框架:对外国(法国、德国、奥地利等)实施司法控制的情况进行了选择性分析,揭示了与哈萨克斯坦共和国类似制度的异同。作者在探讨法院在国际一级的控制权力时,试图确定国际标准和原则在确保哈萨克斯坦共和国刑事诉讼参与人的权利和合法利益方面的重要性。& # x0D;方法:在研究过程中,采用了以下一套特殊方法:对问题进行系统结构分析、形式法律分析和逻辑分析;专家评估国家立法的相关规范及其适用的实践;法律规范的解释;比较法学研究;对所研究问题的概念方法进行建设性批判性分析;检察官选举风险与成本的法律建模与侦查法官对刑事诉讼强制措施的授权。 & # x0D;结果与结论:通过对哈萨克斯坦、法国、德国、英国、意大利和西班牙等国刑事诉讼立法规范的比较研究,可以发现司法控制既有相似之处,又有鲜明之处。这些或其他模式的共同之处在于,司法控制的主要目的是在刑事程序的审前阶段保护、保护和恢复法律关系主体的权利和自由。& # x0D;原创性和价值:哈萨克斯坦共和国宪法所宣告的法治建设的重要标志之一是对初步侦查行使司法控制。经济合作与发展组织(经合发组织)的大多数成员国都坚持这一发展刑事诉讼立法的方向。目前,有关保护、保护和恢复人权和自由的国际标准和原则积累了最先进、经过成功检验的法律概念,这些概念是加强对刑事诉讼参与人权利保障的趋势的自然结果。本文论述了初步调查阶段司法控制的法律规制问题,涉及遵守国际标准的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Standards and Principles, Foreign Legislative Experience of Judicial Control in the Investigation Stage
Objective: The article develops the idea of the need to implement the norms of international legal acts into national legislation, borrowing positive foreign experience in implementing the norms regulating judicial control. At the same time, it is noted that the introduction of international standards and principles into national legal mechanisms is possible only taking into account the peculiarities of the legal system and the legal system of the state. Theoretical framework: A selective analysis of the implementation of judicial control in foreign countries (France, Germany, Austria, etc.) was carried out, similarities and differences from a similar system in the Republic of Kazakhstan were revealed. The author, exploring the control powers of the court at the international level, tried to determine the importance of international standards and principles in ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Method: In the course of the research, a set of the following special methods was used: system-structural, formal-legal and logical analysis of the problem; expert assessment of the relevant norms of national legislation and practice of its application; interpretation of legal norms; comparative legal research; constructive-critical analysis of conceptual approaches to the problems under study; legal modeling of risks and costs of election as a prosecutor and the authorization by the investigating judge of measures of criminal procedural coercion. Results and conclusion: Based on the comparative legal study of the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of Kazakhstan, France, Germany, England, Italy and Spain, it seems possible to note that judicial control has both similar and distinctive features. What unites these or other models is that the main purpose of judicial control is the protection, protection and restoration of the rights and freedoms of subjects of legal relations at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process. Originality and value: One of the important signs of the rule of law, the construction of which is proclaimed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, is the exercise of judicial control over the preliminary investigation. Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) adhere to this vector of development of criminal procedure legislation. Currently, international standards and principles governing the protection, protection, restoration of human rights and freedoms accumulate the most progressive, successfully tested legal concepts, which were the natural result of the tendency to strengthen guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings. The article is devoted to the problems of legal regulation of judicial control at the stage of preliminary investigation related to compliance with international standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信