2021年,运动员心源性猝死和心脏骤停的风险是否增加?

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Søren Roest Korsgaard
{"title":"2021年,运动员心源性猝死和心脏骤停的风险是否增加?","authors":"Søren Roest Korsgaard","doi":"10.1111/sji.13334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a letter dated December 2022, Polykretis and McCullough reported that there had been an increase in sudden cardiac death (SCD) and survived sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) among athletes from 2021 until the date the letter was submitted.1 In the letter, they cited a database purportedly containing 1598 instances of athletes having experienced SCA or SCA during the mentioned timeframe.2 When I examined the database, however, I did not find support for the claim. A number of the cases in the database were unrelated to elite sports as well as SCD or SCA. For example, in some cases, the stated cause of death was suicide. In a different instance, a 70-year-old man reportedly experienced SCD while cycling. The referenced database was clearly disorganized and did not provide evidence of the stated claim. Whether or not there was an increase in SCD and SCA has been the subject of considerable debate, but as far as I am aware no scientific investigation has been conducted.3 This prompted me to look further. In the letter, Polykretis and McCullough compared the data with a systematic review by Bille, Figueiras, Schamasch, et al, who reported that from 1966 to 2004, a total of 1101 athletes under the age of 35 had died as a result of various heart-related conditions. However, such a broad comparison may not be the best approach for assessing whether athletes were at an increased risk of SCA and SCD in 2021 in comparison with pre-COVID data. I would argue that a more appropriate comparison can be drawn if we exclusively focus on cases of SCA and SCD among elite footballers, as this subject has been extensively studied. As elite footballers are in the media spotlight, cases of SCA and SCD are unlikely to be overlooked. Cases occurring at recreational and competitive levels are less likely to receive significant media coverage or be recorded by surveillance systems. The pre-COVID rate of SCA and SCD among footballers was assessed in a prospective, observational study by Egger et al4 known as the FIFA study. Globally, the study found a total of 617 cases of SCD and SCA from 2014 to 2018. A total of 475 died. The study also included a few cases from related sports, including beach soccer, walking football, and futsal. Out of the 617 cases, a total of 95% occurred at the amateur level, which encompassed both recreational and competitive players. It only found 33 cases classified as elite level, amounting to 6.6 cases per year on average. The study was confined to cases during football-specific exercise, such as during training or a match, or within 1 h after cessation of such activity. In the context of this letter, let x denote the number of cases of SCD and SCA in 2021, that is, 10 cases, and let x! = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × … × x. Further, let λ be the average rate, namely 6.6 cases. Euler's constant, e ≈ $$ \\approx $$ 2.71828. It can easily be shown that the 10 cases are not statistically significant, that is, P X ≥ 10 = 0.131 > 0.05 = α $$ P\\left[X\\ge 10\\right]=0.131>0.05=\\alpha $$ , where α is the significance level. It should be pointed out that the data are preliminary and surveillance systems might have picked up additional cases. Furthermore, two potentially relevant cases were excluded due to insufficient corroborating information. If there had been 12 cases or more, then P < 0.05. If evidence eventually emerges that a non-coincidental surge in SCD and SCA took place in 2021, a number of potential causes should be considered. First, as entire football leagues were put to a standstill for long periods in 2020 as a result of lockdowns and restrictions, it is likely that there were significantly fewer cases than the average. If this happened, the cases that under normal circumstances would have taken place in 2020 could have been postponed to 2021, resulting in an increase. Alternatively, myocarditis, which is a major cause of sudden, unexpected death in young adults, may have been induced via a SARS-CoV-2 infection or via mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. It is well documented that post-viral myocarditis can result in SCD in athletes. However, to my knowledge, there have been no reported cases associated with SARS-CoV-2.5 With respect to vaccination, it should be mentioned that an autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis found that “myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination”.6 Moreover, an endomyocardial biopsy-proven case series found that 9 out of 15 patients had detectable spike protein on cardiac myocytes.7 As there was no detectable nucleocapsid protein, it was concluded to be spike protein associated with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The patients had all been diagnosed with myocarditis following vaccination. All in all, the data suggested that myocarditis came about due to an autoimmunological response that had been triggered by the formation of the spike protein within the heart. Supporting these conclusions, a case study in Perfusion found that mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-induced fulminant myocarditis has a “high morbidity and mortality”.8 In discussing possible serious adverse events associated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, it is important to balance these with findings from randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews.9-12 Health authorities and regulatory agencies have assessed that the health-beneficial effects associated with vaccination outweigh the risks. I encourage researchers to study the topic in greater depth and determine the exact number of cases in 2021 and beyond. In conclusion, I thank Polykretis and McCullough for advancing the discourse on the important subject of SCA and SCD in athletes. Daria Joackim Kato assisted with finding cases of SCA and SCD. Caroline Cheruiyot proofread the manuscript. The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.","PeriodicalId":21493,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Were athletes at increased risk of sudden cardiac death and survived sudden cardiac arrest in 2021?\",\"authors\":\"Søren Roest Korsgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sji.13334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a letter dated December 2022, Polykretis and McCullough reported that there had been an increase in sudden cardiac death (SCD) and survived sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) among athletes from 2021 until the date the letter was submitted.1 In the letter, they cited a database purportedly containing 1598 instances of athletes having experienced SCA or SCA during the mentioned timeframe.2 When I examined the database, however, I did not find support for the claim. A number of the cases in the database were unrelated to elite sports as well as SCD or SCA. For example, in some cases, the stated cause of death was suicide. In a different instance, a 70-year-old man reportedly experienced SCD while cycling. The referenced database was clearly disorganized and did not provide evidence of the stated claim. Whether or not there was an increase in SCD and SCA has been the subject of considerable debate, but as far as I am aware no scientific investigation has been conducted.3 This prompted me to look further. In the letter, Polykretis and McCullough compared the data with a systematic review by Bille, Figueiras, Schamasch, et al, who reported that from 1966 to 2004, a total of 1101 athletes under the age of 35 had died as a result of various heart-related conditions. However, such a broad comparison may not be the best approach for assessing whether athletes were at an increased risk of SCA and SCD in 2021 in comparison with pre-COVID data. I would argue that a more appropriate comparison can be drawn if we exclusively focus on cases of SCA and SCD among elite footballers, as this subject has been extensively studied. As elite footballers are in the media spotlight, cases of SCA and SCD are unlikely to be overlooked. Cases occurring at recreational and competitive levels are less likely to receive significant media coverage or be recorded by surveillance systems. The pre-COVID rate of SCA and SCD among footballers was assessed in a prospective, observational study by Egger et al4 known as the FIFA study. Globally, the study found a total of 617 cases of SCD and SCA from 2014 to 2018. A total of 475 died. The study also included a few cases from related sports, including beach soccer, walking football, and futsal. Out of the 617 cases, a total of 95% occurred at the amateur level, which encompassed both recreational and competitive players. It only found 33 cases classified as elite level, amounting to 6.6 cases per year on average. The study was confined to cases during football-specific exercise, such as during training or a match, or within 1 h after cessation of such activity. In the context of this letter, let x denote the number of cases of SCD and SCA in 2021, that is, 10 cases, and let x! = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × … × x. Further, let λ be the average rate, namely 6.6 cases. Euler's constant, e ≈ $$ \\\\approx $$ 2.71828. It can easily be shown that the 10 cases are not statistically significant, that is, P X ≥ 10 = 0.131 > 0.05 = α $$ P\\\\left[X\\\\ge 10\\\\right]=0.131>0.05=\\\\alpha $$ , where α is the significance level. It should be pointed out that the data are preliminary and surveillance systems might have picked up additional cases. Furthermore, two potentially relevant cases were excluded due to insufficient corroborating information. If there had been 12 cases or more, then P < 0.05. If evidence eventually emerges that a non-coincidental surge in SCD and SCA took place in 2021, a number of potential causes should be considered. First, as entire football leagues were put to a standstill for long periods in 2020 as a result of lockdowns and restrictions, it is likely that there were significantly fewer cases than the average. If this happened, the cases that under normal circumstances would have taken place in 2020 could have been postponed to 2021, resulting in an increase. Alternatively, myocarditis, which is a major cause of sudden, unexpected death in young adults, may have been induced via a SARS-CoV-2 infection or via mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. It is well documented that post-viral myocarditis can result in SCD in athletes. However, to my knowledge, there have been no reported cases associated with SARS-CoV-2.5 With respect to vaccination, it should be mentioned that an autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis found that “myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination”.6 Moreover, an endomyocardial biopsy-proven case series found that 9 out of 15 patients had detectable spike protein on cardiac myocytes.7 As there was no detectable nucleocapsid protein, it was concluded to be spike protein associated with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The patients had all been diagnosed with myocarditis following vaccination. All in all, the data suggested that myocarditis came about due to an autoimmunological response that had been triggered by the formation of the spike protein within the heart. Supporting these conclusions, a case study in Perfusion found that mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-induced fulminant myocarditis has a “high morbidity and mortality”.8 In discussing possible serious adverse events associated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, it is important to balance these with findings from randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews.9-12 Health authorities and regulatory agencies have assessed that the health-beneficial effects associated with vaccination outweigh the risks. I encourage researchers to study the topic in greater depth and determine the exact number of cases in 2021 and beyond. In conclusion, I thank Polykretis and McCullough for advancing the discourse on the important subject of SCA and SCD in athletes. Daria Joackim Kato assisted with finding cases of SCA and SCD. Caroline Cheruiyot proofread the manuscript. The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.13334\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.13334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一封日期为2022年12月的信中,Polykretis和McCullough报告说,从2021年到这封信提交之日,运动员中心脏性猝死(SCD)和心脏骤停(SCA)存活的人数有所增加在信中,他们引用了一个据称包含1598名运动员在上述时间段内经历过SCA或SCA的数据库然而,当我检查数据库时,我没有找到支持这种说法的证据。数据库中的许多病例与精英运动以及SCD或SCA无关。例如,在某些案件中,所陈述的死亡原因是自杀。在另一个案例中,据报道,一名70岁的男子在骑车时出现了SCD。所引用的数据库显然杂乱无章,没有提供所述索赔的证据。是否有SCD和SCA的增加一直是一个相当有争议的话题,但据我所知,没有进行过科学调查这促使我进一步研究。在信中,Polykretis和McCullough将这些数据与Bille, Figueiras, Schamasch等人的系统回顾进行了比较,他们报告说,从1966年到2004年,共有1101名35岁以下的运动员死于各种心脏相关疾病。然而,与covid前的数据相比,如此广泛的比较可能不是评估2021年运动员患SCA和SCD风险是否增加的最佳方法。我认为,如果我们只关注精英足球运动员的SCA和SCD病例,可以得出更合适的比较,因为这个主题已经得到了广泛的研究。由于精英足球运动员是媒体关注的焦点,SCA和SCD的案例不太可能被忽视。在娱乐和竞技级别发生的病例不太可能得到媒体的大量报道或被监测系统记录。埃格等人在一项被称为国际足联研究的前瞻性观察研究中评估了足球运动员中SCA和SCD的前冠状病毒感染率。在全球范围内,该研究发现,从2014年到2018年,共有617例SCD和SCA病例。共有475人死亡。这项研究还包括了一些相关运动的案例,包括沙滩足球、步行足球和五人制足球。在617起案件中,共有95起% occurred at the amateur level, which encompassed both recreational and competitive players. It only found 33 cases classified as elite level, amounting to 6.6 cases per year on average. The study was confined to cases during football-specific exercise, such as during training or a match, or within 1 h after cessation of such activity. In the context of this letter, let x denote the number of cases of SCD and SCA in 2021, that is, 10 cases, and let x! = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × … × x. Further, let λ be the average rate, namely 6.6 cases. Euler's constant, e ≈ $$ \approx $$ 2.71828. It can easily be shown that the 10 cases are not statistically significant, that is, P X ≥ 10 = 0.131 > 0.05 = α $$ P\left[X\ge 10\right]=0.131>0.05=\alpha $$ , where α is the significance level. It should be pointed out that the data are preliminary and surveillance systems might have picked up additional cases. Furthermore, two potentially relevant cases were excluded due to insufficient corroborating information. If there had been 12 cases or more, then P < 0.05. If evidence eventually emerges that a non-coincidental surge in SCD and SCA took place in 2021, a number of potential causes should be considered. First, as entire football leagues were put to a standstill for long periods in 2020 as a result of lockdowns and restrictions, it is likely that there were significantly fewer cases than the average. If this happened, the cases that under normal circumstances would have taken place in 2020 could have been postponed to 2021, resulting in an increase. Alternatively, myocarditis, which is a major cause of sudden, unexpected death in young adults, may have been induced via a SARS-CoV-2 infection or via mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. It is well documented that post-viral myocarditis can result in SCD in athletes. However, to my knowledge, there have been no reported cases associated with SARS-CoV-2.5 With respect to vaccination, it should be mentioned that an autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis found that “myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination”.6 Moreover, an endomyocardial biopsy-proven case series found that 9 out of 15 patients had detectable spike protein on cardiac myocytes.7 As there was no detectable nucleocapsid protein, it was concluded to be spike protein associated with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The patients had all been diagnosed with myocarditis following vaccination. All in all, the data suggested that myocarditis came about due to an autoimmunological response that had been triggered by the formation of the spike protein within the heart.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Were athletes at increased risk of sudden cardiac death and survived sudden cardiac arrest in 2021?
In a letter dated December 2022, Polykretis and McCullough reported that there had been an increase in sudden cardiac death (SCD) and survived sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) among athletes from 2021 until the date the letter was submitted.1 In the letter, they cited a database purportedly containing 1598 instances of athletes having experienced SCA or SCA during the mentioned timeframe.2 When I examined the database, however, I did not find support for the claim. A number of the cases in the database were unrelated to elite sports as well as SCD or SCA. For example, in some cases, the stated cause of death was suicide. In a different instance, a 70-year-old man reportedly experienced SCD while cycling. The referenced database was clearly disorganized and did not provide evidence of the stated claim. Whether or not there was an increase in SCD and SCA has been the subject of considerable debate, but as far as I am aware no scientific investigation has been conducted.3 This prompted me to look further. In the letter, Polykretis and McCullough compared the data with a systematic review by Bille, Figueiras, Schamasch, et al, who reported that from 1966 to 2004, a total of 1101 athletes under the age of 35 had died as a result of various heart-related conditions. However, such a broad comparison may not be the best approach for assessing whether athletes were at an increased risk of SCA and SCD in 2021 in comparison with pre-COVID data. I would argue that a more appropriate comparison can be drawn if we exclusively focus on cases of SCA and SCD among elite footballers, as this subject has been extensively studied. As elite footballers are in the media spotlight, cases of SCA and SCD are unlikely to be overlooked. Cases occurring at recreational and competitive levels are less likely to receive significant media coverage or be recorded by surveillance systems. The pre-COVID rate of SCA and SCD among footballers was assessed in a prospective, observational study by Egger et al4 known as the FIFA study. Globally, the study found a total of 617 cases of SCD and SCA from 2014 to 2018. A total of 475 died. The study also included a few cases from related sports, including beach soccer, walking football, and futsal. Out of the 617 cases, a total of 95% occurred at the amateur level, which encompassed both recreational and competitive players. It only found 33 cases classified as elite level, amounting to 6.6 cases per year on average. The study was confined to cases during football-specific exercise, such as during training or a match, or within 1 h after cessation of such activity. In the context of this letter, let x denote the number of cases of SCD and SCA in 2021, that is, 10 cases, and let x! = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × … × x. Further, let λ be the average rate, namely 6.6 cases. Euler's constant, e ≈ $$ \approx $$ 2.71828. It can easily be shown that the 10 cases are not statistically significant, that is, P X ≥ 10 = 0.131 > 0.05 = α $$ P\left[X\ge 10\right]=0.131>0.05=\alpha $$ , where α is the significance level. It should be pointed out that the data are preliminary and surveillance systems might have picked up additional cases. Furthermore, two potentially relevant cases were excluded due to insufficient corroborating information. If there had been 12 cases or more, then P < 0.05. If evidence eventually emerges that a non-coincidental surge in SCD and SCA took place in 2021, a number of potential causes should be considered. First, as entire football leagues were put to a standstill for long periods in 2020 as a result of lockdowns and restrictions, it is likely that there were significantly fewer cases than the average. If this happened, the cases that under normal circumstances would have taken place in 2020 could have been postponed to 2021, resulting in an increase. Alternatively, myocarditis, which is a major cause of sudden, unexpected death in young adults, may have been induced via a SARS-CoV-2 infection or via mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. It is well documented that post-viral myocarditis can result in SCD in athletes. However, to my knowledge, there have been no reported cases associated with SARS-CoV-2.5 With respect to vaccination, it should be mentioned that an autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis found that “myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination”.6 Moreover, an endomyocardial biopsy-proven case series found that 9 out of 15 patients had detectable spike protein on cardiac myocytes.7 As there was no detectable nucleocapsid protein, it was concluded to be spike protein associated with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The patients had all been diagnosed with myocarditis following vaccination. All in all, the data suggested that myocarditis came about due to an autoimmunological response that had been triggered by the formation of the spike protein within the heart. Supporting these conclusions, a case study in Perfusion found that mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-induced fulminant myocarditis has a “high morbidity and mortality”.8 In discussing possible serious adverse events associated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, it is important to balance these with findings from randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews.9-12 Health authorities and regulatory agencies have assessed that the health-beneficial effects associated with vaccination outweigh the risks. I encourage researchers to study the topic in greater depth and determine the exact number of cases in 2021 and beyond. In conclusion, I thank Polykretis and McCullough for advancing the discourse on the important subject of SCA and SCD in athletes. Daria Joackim Kato assisted with finding cases of SCA and SCD. Caroline Cheruiyot proofread the manuscript. The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed international journal publishes original articles and reviews on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical immunology. The journal aims to provide high quality service to authors, and high quality articles for readers. The journal accepts for publication material from investigators all over the world, which makes a significant contribution to basic, translational and clinical immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信