COVID-19大流行对一线医护人员的影响

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
T De Gaaij, N De Mey, A Moerman
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对一线医护人员的影响","authors":"T De Gaaij, N De Mey, A Moerman","doi":"10.56126/74.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous studies have shown that frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) have higher rates of pre-existing mental health problems and may be therefore at risk for worsening of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes an increased prevalence for anxiety, depression, acute stress and post- traumatic stress disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the subjective and professional burden of the HCWs working in frontline departments of our hospital. Objective: The aim was primarily to identify the psychological and professional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCWs working in the frontline during the first two waves. Design and setting: This was a single-centre multidisciplinary survey. Methods: A printed survey was distributed to all HCWs (N=240) working in the intensive care unit and emergency department during the first and second COVID-19 outbreak. We evaluated the subjective and professional burden using 4-point Likert scale questions. Three-group comparisons based on years of work experience were made using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Comparisons per participant between two successive waves were made using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: A total number of 171 HCWs (71.3%) participated in the survey. Participants mainly feared infecting their family and friends. A majority of the participants showed a high motivation working in the COVID- zone. More than half of the participants reported that their quality of sleep was unaffected by the pandemic. Despite a higher workload, work performance and interactions with colleagues were not negatively affected by the pandemic. No significant difference was found based on years of work experience. Participants had an overall decrease in personal impact during the second wave. However, work motivation decreased (p<0.001). Participants felt better protected by the offered equipment (p=0.004), but felt less appreciated (p=0.01). Conclusions: The pandemic appeared to have affected the subjective and professional burden of our participants. However, they were not as severely impacted as HCWs in some other studies. Acquired knowledge should be utilized in developing preventive and interventional strategies to support HCWs affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential pandemics in the future.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in the frontline\",\"authors\":\"T De Gaaij, N De Mey, A Moerman\",\"doi\":\"10.56126/74.2.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Previous studies have shown that frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) have higher rates of pre-existing mental health problems and may be therefore at risk for worsening of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes an increased prevalence for anxiety, depression, acute stress and post- traumatic stress disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the subjective and professional burden of the HCWs working in frontline departments of our hospital. Objective: The aim was primarily to identify the psychological and professional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCWs working in the frontline during the first two waves. Design and setting: This was a single-centre multidisciplinary survey. Methods: A printed survey was distributed to all HCWs (N=240) working in the intensive care unit and emergency department during the first and second COVID-19 outbreak. We evaluated the subjective and professional burden using 4-point Likert scale questions. Three-group comparisons based on years of work experience were made using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Comparisons per participant between two successive waves were made using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: A total number of 171 HCWs (71.3%) participated in the survey. Participants mainly feared infecting their family and friends. A majority of the participants showed a high motivation working in the COVID- zone. More than half of the participants reported that their quality of sleep was unaffected by the pandemic. Despite a higher workload, work performance and interactions with colleagues were not negatively affected by the pandemic. No significant difference was found based on years of work experience. Participants had an overall decrease in personal impact during the second wave. However, work motivation decreased (p<0.001). Participants felt better protected by the offered equipment (p=0.004), but felt less appreciated (p=0.01). Conclusions: The pandemic appeared to have affected the subjective and professional burden of our participants. However, they were not as severely impacted as HCWs in some other studies. Acquired knowledge should be utilized in developing preventive and interventional strategies to support HCWs affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential pandemics in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56126/74.2.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/74.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究表明,一线卫生保健工作者(HCWs)先前存在精神健康问题的比例较高,因此可能面临2019冠状病毒病大流行期间精神健康问题恶化的风险。这包括焦虑、抑郁、急性应激和创伤后应激障碍的患病率增加。本研究的目的是评估在我院一线科室工作的卫生保健员的主观和专业负担。目的:主要目的是确定前两波COVID-19大流行对一线医护人员的心理和专业影响。设计和环境:这是一项单中心多学科调查。方法:对第一次和第二次COVID-19暴发期间在重症监护病房和急诊科工作的所有医护人员(N=240)进行纸质调查。我们使用4点李克特量表评估主观和专业负担。使用Kruskal-Wallis测试对基于多年工作经验的三组进行比较。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验对两个连续波之间的每个参与者进行比较。结果:共有171名医护人员参与调查,占71.3%。参与者主要担心感染他们的家人和朋友。大多数参与者都表现出很高的工作积极性。超过一半的参与者报告说,他们的睡眠质量没有受到疫情的影响。尽管工作量增加,但工作业绩和与同事的互动并未受到大流行的负面影响。工作年限差异不显著。在第二波中,参与者的个人影响力总体上有所下降。然而,工作动机下降(p<0.001)。参与者感到被提供的设备更好地保护了(p=0.004),但感觉不那么受欢迎(p=0.01)。结论:大流行似乎影响了我们参与者的主观和专业负担。然而,在其他一些研究中,他们受到的影响并不像卫生保健工作者那样严重。应利用已获得的知识制定预防和干预战略,以支持受COVID-19大流行和未来潜在大流行影响的卫生保健工作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in the frontline
Background: Previous studies have shown that frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) have higher rates of pre-existing mental health problems and may be therefore at risk for worsening of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes an increased prevalence for anxiety, depression, acute stress and post- traumatic stress disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the subjective and professional burden of the HCWs working in frontline departments of our hospital. Objective: The aim was primarily to identify the psychological and professional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCWs working in the frontline during the first two waves. Design and setting: This was a single-centre multidisciplinary survey. Methods: A printed survey was distributed to all HCWs (N=240) working in the intensive care unit and emergency department during the first and second COVID-19 outbreak. We evaluated the subjective and professional burden using 4-point Likert scale questions. Three-group comparisons based on years of work experience were made using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Comparisons per participant between two successive waves were made using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: A total number of 171 HCWs (71.3%) participated in the survey. Participants mainly feared infecting their family and friends. A majority of the participants showed a high motivation working in the COVID- zone. More than half of the participants reported that their quality of sleep was unaffected by the pandemic. Despite a higher workload, work performance and interactions with colleagues were not negatively affected by the pandemic. No significant difference was found based on years of work experience. Participants had an overall decrease in personal impact during the second wave. However, work motivation decreased (p<0.001). Participants felt better protected by the offered equipment (p=0.004), but felt less appreciated (p=0.01). Conclusions: The pandemic appeared to have affected the subjective and professional burden of our participants. However, they were not as severely impacted as HCWs in some other studies. Acquired knowledge should be utilized in developing preventive and interventional strategies to support HCWs affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential pandemics in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信