美国总统换届中的政治两极分化与情感修辞:特朗普与拜登在Twitter上的对比研究及选后对公众的影响

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Ricardo Domínguez-García, Sandra Méndez-Muros, Concha Pérez-Curiel, Mónica Hinojosa-Becerra
{"title":"美国总统换届中的政治两极分化与情感修辞:特朗普与拜登在Twitter上的对比研究及选后对公众的影响","authors":"Ricardo Domínguez-García, Sandra Méndez-Muros, Concha Pérez-Curiel, Mónica Hinojosa-Becerra","doi":"10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pictures of the US Capitol attack, on January 6, 2021, represent a before and after in a country marked by the culture of political polarization. Following a presidential campaign based on misinformation and accusations of electoral fraud by Republican candidate Donald Trump, the level of maximum polarization causes a climate of social rupture. Faced with this, the Democratic candidate and winner of the elections, Joe Biden, projects a discourse of institutional stability and legality as a strategy before public opinion. Two years later, the abrupt division of the US electorate is evident, with a significant percentage of Republican voters questioning the legitimacy of the electoral process. The objective of this research is to find out the strategies of political polarization deployed by Donald Trump and Joe Biden on Twitter in the 2020-2021 presidential transition period, as well as the public’s response. Based on a general sample of 1,060 tweets, a comparative content analysis methodology with a triple approach (quantitative-qualitative-discursive) is applied, based on the study of themes, emotions, and the ability to go viral of the messages of both political leaders. The results confirm a Trump’s speech defined by polarization, misinformation and the attack on the democratic system, relegating information from his presidential administration in the last months of his term to the background. On the contrary, Biden avoids confrontation and reinforces his legitimacy as president-elect, by announcing management measures of the future government. The engagement value of the social audience on Twitter is also added, with a position of support for the winner of the elections.","PeriodicalId":20684,"journal":{"name":"Profesional De La Informacion","volume":" 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Domínguez-García, Sandra Méndez-Muros, Concha Pérez-Curiel, Mónica Hinojosa-Becerra\",\"doi\":\"10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pictures of the US Capitol attack, on January 6, 2021, represent a before and after in a country marked by the culture of political polarization. Following a presidential campaign based on misinformation and accusations of electoral fraud by Republican candidate Donald Trump, the level of maximum polarization causes a climate of social rupture. Faced with this, the Democratic candidate and winner of the elections, Joe Biden, projects a discourse of institutional stability and legality as a strategy before public opinion. Two years later, the abrupt division of the US electorate is evident, with a significant percentage of Republican voters questioning the legitimacy of the electoral process. The objective of this research is to find out the strategies of political polarization deployed by Donald Trump and Joe Biden on Twitter in the 2020-2021 presidential transition period, as well as the public’s response. Based on a general sample of 1,060 tweets, a comparative content analysis methodology with a triple approach (quantitative-qualitative-discursive) is applied, based on the study of themes, emotions, and the ability to go viral of the messages of both political leaders. The results confirm a Trump’s speech defined by polarization, misinformation and the attack on the democratic system, relegating information from his presidential administration in the last months of his term to the background. On the contrary, Biden avoids confrontation and reinforces his legitimacy as president-elect, by announcing management measures of the future government. The engagement value of the social audience on Twitter is also added, with a position of support for the winner of the elections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Profesional De La Informacion\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Profesional De La Informacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesional De La Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年1月6日美国国会大厦遇袭的照片,代表了一个以政治两极分化文化为标志的国家的袭击前后。在基于错误信息和共和党候选人唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)的选举欺诈指控的总统竞选之后,两极分化的程度达到了极点,导致了社会破裂的气氛。面对这种情况,民主党候选人、大选获胜者乔·拜登(Joe Biden)在公众面前提出了一种关于制度稳定和合法性的论述,作为一种战略。两年后,美国选民的突然分裂显而易见,相当大比例的共和党选民质疑选举过程的合法性。本研究的目的是找出唐纳德·特朗普和乔·拜登在2020-2021年总统过渡时期在Twitter上部署的政治两极分化策略,以及公众的反应。基于1060条推文的一般样本,基于对两位政治领导人的主题、情绪和信息的病毒式传播能力的研究,应用了一种具有三重方法(定量-定性-话语)的比较内容分析方法。结果证实,特朗普的演讲以两极分化、错误信息和对民主制度的攻击为特征,在他任期的最后几个月里,他的政府的信息被推到了幕后。相反,拜登通过发表未来政府的经营对策,避免了对抗,强化了当选人的正当性。Twitter上的社交受众的参与价值也增加了,支持选举获胜者的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public
The pictures of the US Capitol attack, on January 6, 2021, represent a before and after in a country marked by the culture of political polarization. Following a presidential campaign based on misinformation and accusations of electoral fraud by Republican candidate Donald Trump, the level of maximum polarization causes a climate of social rupture. Faced with this, the Democratic candidate and winner of the elections, Joe Biden, projects a discourse of institutional stability and legality as a strategy before public opinion. Two years later, the abrupt division of the US electorate is evident, with a significant percentage of Republican voters questioning the legitimacy of the electoral process. The objective of this research is to find out the strategies of political polarization deployed by Donald Trump and Joe Biden on Twitter in the 2020-2021 presidential transition period, as well as the public’s response. Based on a general sample of 1,060 tweets, a comparative content analysis methodology with a triple approach (quantitative-qualitative-discursive) is applied, based on the study of themes, emotions, and the ability to go viral of the messages of both political leaders. The results confirm a Trump’s speech defined by polarization, misinformation and the attack on the democratic system, relegating information from his presidential administration in the last months of his term to the background. On the contrary, Biden avoids confrontation and reinforces his legitimacy as president-elect, by announcing management measures of the future government. The engagement value of the social audience on Twitter is also added, with a position of support for the winner of the elections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: El profesional de la información es una revista sobre información, bibliotecas y nuevas tecnologías de la información. Primera revista española de Biblioteconomía y Documentación indexada por las dos bases de datos bibliográficas internacionales más importantes: ISI Social Science Citation Index y Scopus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信