灾难性处方药医疗保险费用分担意愿调查问卷的编制

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Diesty Anita Nugraheni, Satibi Satibi, Susi Ari Kristina, Diah Ayu Puspandari
{"title":"灾难性处方药医疗保险费用分担意愿调查问卷的编制","authors":"Diesty Anita Nugraheni, Satibi Satibi, Susi Ari Kristina, Diah Ayu Puspandari","doi":"10.22146/ijp.7173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prescription drug cost-sharing in Indonesia remains challenging because no valid willingness-to-pay (WTP) questionnaire for this cost-sharing is available. The aim of this study was to conduct item selection and evaluate the content validity of the questionnaire on the WTP for prescription drug cost-sharing under the national health insurance scheme in patients with catastrophic illnesses. The method was a cross-sectional study and used a three-step design, namely literature review, consultation with some health economics experts, and evaluation of content validity. This study involved 9 experts, consisting of academicians and health professionals who worked in a hospital, to perform content validation of a questionnaire on the WTP for prescription drug cost-sharing. This study used CVI (content validity index) and CVR (content validity ratio) for both individual item measurement and the overall scale. This study's results reveal a questionnaire comprising 47 items grouped into five domains: healthcare utilization information, participation in health insurance information, drug information, and cost-sharing scenarios. The questionnaire items were extracted from many sources. The items that could be used for the study should have an I-CVI of 0.79-1.00. There were three items removed because of criticisms from the experts and Item-CVI<0.79 and CVR<0.62. Those with Item-CVI>0.79 were revised. The overall scale of the questionnaire was excellent with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.94. We conclude that the questionnaire on the willingness-to-pay for prescription drug cost-sharing was developed and validated through expert consultation, item selection, and CVI. The questionnaire reviewed in this study had good content validity. As a follow-up, a new 42-item questionnaire was developed.","PeriodicalId":13520,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Questionnaire on Willingness-to-Pay for Health Insurance Cost-Sharing for Catastrophic Prescription Drugs\",\"authors\":\"Diesty Anita Nugraheni, Satibi Satibi, Susi Ari Kristina, Diah Ayu Puspandari\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/ijp.7173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prescription drug cost-sharing in Indonesia remains challenging because no valid willingness-to-pay (WTP) questionnaire for this cost-sharing is available. The aim of this study was to conduct item selection and evaluate the content validity of the questionnaire on the WTP for prescription drug cost-sharing under the national health insurance scheme in patients with catastrophic illnesses. The method was a cross-sectional study and used a three-step design, namely literature review, consultation with some health economics experts, and evaluation of content validity. This study involved 9 experts, consisting of academicians and health professionals who worked in a hospital, to perform content validation of a questionnaire on the WTP for prescription drug cost-sharing. This study used CVI (content validity index) and CVR (content validity ratio) for both individual item measurement and the overall scale. This study's results reveal a questionnaire comprising 47 items grouped into five domains: healthcare utilization information, participation in health insurance information, drug information, and cost-sharing scenarios. The questionnaire items were extracted from many sources. The items that could be used for the study should have an I-CVI of 0.79-1.00. There were three items removed because of criticisms from the experts and Item-CVI<0.79 and CVR<0.62. Those with Item-CVI>0.79 were revised. The overall scale of the questionnaire was excellent with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.94. We conclude that the questionnaire on the willingness-to-pay for prescription drug cost-sharing was developed and validated through expert consultation, item selection, and CVI. The questionnaire reviewed in this study had good content validity. As a follow-up, a new 42-item questionnaire was developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.7173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.7173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚的处方药费用分摊仍然具有挑战性,因为没有有效的支付意愿(WTP)调查问卷。摘要本研究的目的是对巨灾病患健保处方药费用分担WTP问卷进行项目选择及内容效度评估。本研究为横断面研究,采用文献回顾、咨询部分卫生经济学专家、内容效度评估三步设计。本研究涉及9名在医院工作的专家,包括院士和卫生专业人员,对处方药费用分担WTP问卷进行内容验证。本研究采用内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)分别进行单项和整体量表的测量。本研究的结果揭示了一份由47个项目组成的问卷,分为五个领域:医疗保健利用信息、参与医疗保险信息、药物信息和成本分摊场景。问卷项目是从许多来源提取的。可用于研究的项目应具有0.79-1.00的I-CVI。由于专家的批评和Item-CVI<0.79和CVR<0.62,有三个项目被删除。对Item-CVI>0.79进行修正。问卷的整体量表为优秀,S-CVI/Ave为0.94。结论:通过专家咨询、项目选择和CVI,编制了处方药费用分担支付意愿问卷,并对问卷进行了验证。本研究所编制的问卷具有良好的内容效度。作为后续行动,编制了一份新的42项问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Questionnaire on Willingness-to-Pay for Health Insurance Cost-Sharing for Catastrophic Prescription Drugs
Prescription drug cost-sharing in Indonesia remains challenging because no valid willingness-to-pay (WTP) questionnaire for this cost-sharing is available. The aim of this study was to conduct item selection and evaluate the content validity of the questionnaire on the WTP for prescription drug cost-sharing under the national health insurance scheme in patients with catastrophic illnesses. The method was a cross-sectional study and used a three-step design, namely literature review, consultation with some health economics experts, and evaluation of content validity. This study involved 9 experts, consisting of academicians and health professionals who worked in a hospital, to perform content validation of a questionnaire on the WTP for prescription drug cost-sharing. This study used CVI (content validity index) and CVR (content validity ratio) for both individual item measurement and the overall scale. This study's results reveal a questionnaire comprising 47 items grouped into five domains: healthcare utilization information, participation in health insurance information, drug information, and cost-sharing scenarios. The questionnaire items were extracted from many sources. The items that could be used for the study should have an I-CVI of 0.79-1.00. There were three items removed because of criticisms from the experts and Item-CVI<0.79 and CVR<0.62. Those with Item-CVI>0.79 were revised. The overall scale of the questionnaire was excellent with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.94. We conclude that the questionnaire on the willingness-to-pay for prescription drug cost-sharing was developed and validated through expert consultation, item selection, and CVI. The questionnaire reviewed in this study had good content validity. As a follow-up, a new 42-item questionnaire was developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal had been established in 1972, and online publication was begun in 2008. Since 2012, the journal has been published in English by Faculty of Pharmacy Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Yogyakarta Indonesia in collaboration with IAI (Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia or Indonesian Pharmacist Association) and only receives manuscripts in English. Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy is Accredited by Directorate General of Higher Education. The journal includes various fields of pharmaceuticals sciences such as: -Pharmacology and Toxicology -Pharmacokinetics -Community and Clinical Pharmacy -Pharmaceutical Chemistry -Pharmaceutical Biology -Pharmaceutics -Pharmaceutical Technology -Biopharmaceutics -Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology -Alternative medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信