构建中欧贸易关系:英国报纸报道内容分析(2001-2021)

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Xiaoyang Zhao, Knut De Swert, Mark Boukes, Rens Vliegenthart
{"title":"构建中欧贸易关系:英国报纸报道内容分析(2001-2021)","authors":"Xiaoyang Zhao, Knut De Swert, Mark Boukes, Rens Vliegenthart","doi":"10.1080/1461670x.2023.2260497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate over China’s economic influence on the European Union has grown prominent on both political and media agendas. However, little is known about how the UK media have framed EU–China trade relations in the past two decades. This case study employs a manual quantitative content analysis to investigate trends over time in the presence of frames and tone in UK newspaper coverage of EU–China trade relations (2001–2021) and to further explore differences between newspaper types in their portrayal of this topic (N = 600). Popular newspapers paid much less attention to EU–China trade relations than financial and quality newspapers but featured the most negative tone. Significant frame variation was detected over time and across newspapers, with the risk frame being the most visible. We also identified a significant negative correlation between tone and various frames. The findings not only contribute to existing economic news research by expanding on the theories of framing, negativity bias, and economic newsworthiness in the context of international trade relations but also carry implications for policy-makers and journalists.","PeriodicalId":17541,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Studies","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing EU–China Trade Relations: A Content Analysis of UK Newspaper Coverage (2001–2021)\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyang Zhao, Knut De Swert, Mark Boukes, Rens Vliegenthart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1461670x.2023.2260497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate over China’s economic influence on the European Union has grown prominent on both political and media agendas. However, little is known about how the UK media have framed EU–China trade relations in the past two decades. This case study employs a manual quantitative content analysis to investigate trends over time in the presence of frames and tone in UK newspaper coverage of EU–China trade relations (2001–2021) and to further explore differences between newspaper types in their portrayal of this topic (N = 600). Popular newspapers paid much less attention to EU–China trade relations than financial and quality newspapers but featured the most negative tone. Significant frame variation was detected over time and across newspapers, with the risk frame being the most visible. We also identified a significant negative correlation between tone and various frames. The findings not only contribute to existing economic news research by expanding on the theories of framing, negativity bias, and economic newsworthiness in the context of international trade relations but also carry implications for policy-makers and journalists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism Studies\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2023.2260497\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2023.2260497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于中国对欧盟经济影响的辩论在政治和媒体议程上都变得越来越突出。然而,在过去20年里,英国媒体是如何塑造欧中贸易关系的,我们知之甚少。本案例研究采用手动定量内容分析来调查2001-2021年英国报纸报道欧盟-中国贸易关系的框架和语气随时间的趋势,并进一步探讨不同类型报纸在报道这一主题时的差异(N = 600)。大众报纸对欧中贸易关系的关注远不及财经和优质报纸,但其负面基调最为明显。随着时间的推移和报纸的不同,我们发现了显著的框架变化,其中风险框架最为明显。我们还发现音调和各种框架之间存在显著的负相关。这些发现不仅通过扩展框架理论、负面偏见理论和国际贸易关系背景下的经济新闻价值理论,为现有的经济新闻研究做出了贡献,而且对政策制定者和记者也有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framing EU–China Trade Relations: A Content Analysis of UK Newspaper Coverage (2001–2021)
The debate over China’s economic influence on the European Union has grown prominent on both political and media agendas. However, little is known about how the UK media have framed EU–China trade relations in the past two decades. This case study employs a manual quantitative content analysis to investigate trends over time in the presence of frames and tone in UK newspaper coverage of EU–China trade relations (2001–2021) and to further explore differences between newspaper types in their portrayal of this topic (N = 600). Popular newspapers paid much less attention to EU–China trade relations than financial and quality newspapers but featured the most negative tone. Significant frame variation was detected over time and across newspapers, with the risk frame being the most visible. We also identified a significant negative correlation between tone and various frames. The findings not only contribute to existing economic news research by expanding on the theories of framing, negativity bias, and economic newsworthiness in the context of international trade relations but also carry implications for policy-makers and journalists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism Studies
Journalism Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信