货运系统对破坏性事件的弹性:概念和度量的回顾

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
PHANI KUMAR PATNALA, Jonathan D Regehr, Babak Mehran, Chaouki Regoui
{"title":"货运系统对破坏性事件的弹性:概念和度量的回顾","authors":"PHANI KUMAR PATNALA, Jonathan D Regehr, Babak Mehran, Chaouki Regoui","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2023-0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resilience is a multidisciplinary concept that deals with rapid response and recovery of a system experiencing a disruption. Despite extensive research on this topic, there is a need to clarify resilience concepts in the context of road freight transportation systems (FTSs) from a three-dimensional perspective (i.e., physical infrastructure, users, and managing organizations) and to identify persistent knowledge gaps concerning the characterization and measurement of FTS resilience vis-à-vis disruptive events. This paper addresses these shortcomings through a systematic review of 149 research studies. The synthesis of findings clarifies inconsistencies associated with the characteristics of FTS resilience and in so doing, establishes a unified framework for measuring FTS resilience through the life cycle of disruptive events. Critical data gaps, methodological shortcomings, and a lack of empirical evidence concerning FTS resilience to disruptive events remain. More robust analytical approaches are required to incorporate interdependencies among FTS dimensions into resilience assessments.","PeriodicalId":9414,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience for Freight Transportation Systems to Disruptive Events: A Review of Concepts and Metrics\",\"authors\":\"PHANI KUMAR PATNALA, Jonathan D Regehr, Babak Mehran, Chaouki Regoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjce-2023-0187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resilience is a multidisciplinary concept that deals with rapid response and recovery of a system experiencing a disruption. Despite extensive research on this topic, there is a need to clarify resilience concepts in the context of road freight transportation systems (FTSs) from a three-dimensional perspective (i.e., physical infrastructure, users, and managing organizations) and to identify persistent knowledge gaps concerning the characterization and measurement of FTS resilience vis-à-vis disruptive events. This paper addresses these shortcomings through a systematic review of 149 research studies. The synthesis of findings clarifies inconsistencies associated with the characteristics of FTS resilience and in so doing, establishes a unified framework for measuring FTS resilience through the life cycle of disruptive events. Critical data gaps, methodological shortcomings, and a lack of empirical evidence concerning FTS resilience to disruptive events remain. More robust analytical approaches are required to incorporate interdependencies among FTS dimensions into resilience assessments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弹性是一个多学科的概念,涉及系统经历中断的快速响应和恢复。尽管对这一主题进行了广泛的研究,但仍有必要从三维角度(即物理基础设施、用户和管理组织)澄清公路货运系统(FTSs)背景下的弹性概念,并确定与-à-vis破坏性事件有关的FTSs弹性的表征和测量方面的持续知识差距。本文通过对149项研究的系统回顾来解决这些缺点。研究结果的综合澄清了与FTS弹性特征相关的不一致性,并由此建立了一个统一的框架,通过破坏性事件的生命周期来衡量FTS弹性。关于FTS对破坏性事件的恢复能力,仍然存在关键的数据缺口、方法缺陷和缺乏经验证据。需要更有力的分析方法,将FTS各维度之间的相互依赖关系纳入复原力评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience for Freight Transportation Systems to Disruptive Events: A Review of Concepts and Metrics
Resilience is a multidisciplinary concept that deals with rapid response and recovery of a system experiencing a disruption. Despite extensive research on this topic, there is a need to clarify resilience concepts in the context of road freight transportation systems (FTSs) from a three-dimensional perspective (i.e., physical infrastructure, users, and managing organizations) and to identify persistent knowledge gaps concerning the characterization and measurement of FTS resilience vis-à-vis disruptive events. This paper addresses these shortcomings through a systematic review of 149 research studies. The synthesis of findings clarifies inconsistencies associated with the characteristics of FTS resilience and in so doing, establishes a unified framework for measuring FTS resilience through the life cycle of disruptive events. Critical data gaps, methodological shortcomings, and a lack of empirical evidence concerning FTS resilience to disruptive events remain. More robust analytical approaches are required to incorporate interdependencies among FTS dimensions into resilience assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
14 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. It contains articles on environmental engineering, hydrotechnical engineering, structural engineering, construction engineering, engineering mechanics, engineering materials, and history of civil engineering. Contributors include recognized researchers and practitioners in industry, government, and academia. New developments in engineering design and construction are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信