机械循环支持的心理效应回顾性分析。

The Journal of heart transplantation Pub Date : 1990-05-01
S A Ruzevich, M T Swartz, J E Reedy, D F Termuhlen, L R McBride, S M Frese, D G Pennington
{"title":"机械循环支持的心理效应回顾性分析。","authors":"S A Ruzevich,&nbsp;M T Swartz,&nbsp;J E Reedy,&nbsp;D F Termuhlen,&nbsp;L R McBride,&nbsp;S M Frese,&nbsp;D G Pennington","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an increasing need to evaluate the psychologic impact of circulatory support because of the growing use of mechanical assist devices. Twenty-seven people, 12 survivors of mechanical circulatory assistance and 15 family members, were surveyed; nonsurvivors' families were not surveyed. The 12 survivors (ages 18 to 66 years; mean, 43 years) had been supported with Pierce-Donachy ventricular assist devices (nine patients) and the Novacor left ventricular assist system (one patient). One patient received a centrifugal pump, and one was supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Duration of support ranged from 8 hours to 90 days (mean, 23 days). Ten people surveyed were spouses of these patients, and five were parents of children who had been supported with ECMO. Three patients were supported longer than 3 weeks, and four patients were awake and ambulatory during support. Financial worries were not a concern for 80% of the parents but were a concern for 80% of the spouses. Eighteen percent of the patients believed they were treated as an experiment, whereas 40% of their spouses thought they were. None of the parents thought their child was treated as an experiment. Sixty-seven percent of the patients stated that they have returned to a normal life-style, and 75% feel they have a brighter outlook on life. Six patients have returned to work, two are retired, two are disabled, and two have physical capabilities to work but choose not to. Eighty-nine percent of all those surveyed would recommend an assist device to someone who needed one. Although these procedures are often associated with severe medical and psychologic complications, 74% of the patients would agree to a second implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":77638,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of heart transplantation","volume":"9 3 Pt 1","pages":"209-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis of the psychologic effects of mechanical circulatory support.\",\"authors\":\"S A Ruzevich,&nbsp;M T Swartz,&nbsp;J E Reedy,&nbsp;D F Termuhlen,&nbsp;L R McBride,&nbsp;S M Frese,&nbsp;D G Pennington\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is an increasing need to evaluate the psychologic impact of circulatory support because of the growing use of mechanical assist devices. Twenty-seven people, 12 survivors of mechanical circulatory assistance and 15 family members, were surveyed; nonsurvivors' families were not surveyed. The 12 survivors (ages 18 to 66 years; mean, 43 years) had been supported with Pierce-Donachy ventricular assist devices (nine patients) and the Novacor left ventricular assist system (one patient). One patient received a centrifugal pump, and one was supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Duration of support ranged from 8 hours to 90 days (mean, 23 days). Ten people surveyed were spouses of these patients, and five were parents of children who had been supported with ECMO. Three patients were supported longer than 3 weeks, and four patients were awake and ambulatory during support. Financial worries were not a concern for 80% of the parents but were a concern for 80% of the spouses. Eighteen percent of the patients believed they were treated as an experiment, whereas 40% of their spouses thought they were. None of the parents thought their child was treated as an experiment. Sixty-seven percent of the patients stated that they have returned to a normal life-style, and 75% feel they have a brighter outlook on life. Six patients have returned to work, two are retired, two are disabled, and two have physical capabilities to work but choose not to. Eighty-nine percent of all those surveyed would recommend an assist device to someone who needed one. Although these procedures are often associated with severe medical and psychologic complications, 74% of the patients would agree to a second implant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of heart transplantation\",\"volume\":\"9 3 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"209-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of heart transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of heart transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于越来越多地使用机械辅助装置,因此越来越需要评估循环支持的心理影响。共有27人接受了调查,其中包括12名依靠机械循环辅助的幸存者和15名家庭成员;非幸存者的家庭没有被调查。12名幸存者(18至66岁);9例患者使用Pierce-Donachy心室辅助装置,1例患者使用Novacor左心室辅助系统。一名患者接受离心泵,一名患者接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)支持。支持时间从8小时到90天不等(平均23天)。接受调查的10人是这些患者的配偶,5人是接受体外膜肺氧合治疗的孩子的父母。3例患者支持时间超过3周,4例患者在支持期间保持清醒和活动。80%的父母不担心经济问题,但80%的配偶担心经济问题。18%的病人认为他们被当作实验品对待,而他们的配偶中有40%的人这样认为。没有一个家长认为他们的孩子被当作实验品。67%的患者表示他们已经恢复了正常的生活方式,75%的患者认为他们的生活前景更加光明。6名患者已经重返工作岗位,2名退休,2名残疾,还有2名有工作能力但选择不工作。89%的受访者会向需要的人推荐辅助设备。尽管这些手术通常伴随着严重的医学和心理并发症,74%的患者同意第二次植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective analysis of the psychologic effects of mechanical circulatory support.

There is an increasing need to evaluate the psychologic impact of circulatory support because of the growing use of mechanical assist devices. Twenty-seven people, 12 survivors of mechanical circulatory assistance and 15 family members, were surveyed; nonsurvivors' families were not surveyed. The 12 survivors (ages 18 to 66 years; mean, 43 years) had been supported with Pierce-Donachy ventricular assist devices (nine patients) and the Novacor left ventricular assist system (one patient). One patient received a centrifugal pump, and one was supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Duration of support ranged from 8 hours to 90 days (mean, 23 days). Ten people surveyed were spouses of these patients, and five were parents of children who had been supported with ECMO. Three patients were supported longer than 3 weeks, and four patients were awake and ambulatory during support. Financial worries were not a concern for 80% of the parents but were a concern for 80% of the spouses. Eighteen percent of the patients believed they were treated as an experiment, whereas 40% of their spouses thought they were. None of the parents thought their child was treated as an experiment. Sixty-seven percent of the patients stated that they have returned to a normal life-style, and 75% feel they have a brighter outlook on life. Six patients have returned to work, two are retired, two are disabled, and two have physical capabilities to work but choose not to. Eighty-nine percent of all those surveyed would recommend an assist device to someone who needed one. Although these procedures are often associated with severe medical and psychologic complications, 74% of the patients would agree to a second implant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信