手工与数字方法与青年人立体视觉评估的比较研究

Q4 Medicine
. Gul e Lala, Nashrah Imtiaz, Arsham Ikram, Anusha Sheraz, Qurat ul Ain, Sawera Ammad, Mawra Zahid
{"title":"手工与数字方法与青年人立体视觉评估的比较研究","authors":". Gul e Lala, Nashrah Imtiaz, Arsham Ikram, Anusha Sheraz, Qurat ul Ain, Sawera Ammad, Mawra Zahid","doi":"10.54393/pjhs.v4i09.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reduced stereopsis or depth perception may be the early indicator of abnormal motor functions in people therefore, the stereopsis test is considered ideal for visual screening. It can accomplish the need for the assessment of stereopsis by using a cost-effective smartphone application. Objective: To compare the stereo acuity values of manual and digital stereopsis tests by using the Random Dot Stereo Acuity test with Lea Symbols (Manual) and the SAT App for Android (Digital). Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in the Eye department at The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital from February 2023 to May 2023. A total of 62 subjects aged 15-35 years were included in our study, out of which 31 were emmetropes and 31 were ametropes. Screening of subjects was done which included torch light examination and basic refraction. Manually stereopsis was measured using Random Dot stereo acuity test with Lea symbols and digitally it was measured by SAT application. Results: The mean ± SD stereo acuity value of the manual test (N=62) was 60.5242 ± 36.47607 seconds of arc and the mean stereo acuity value of the digital test (N=62) was 70.0968 ± 28.29569 seconds of arc. P-value was 0.006 which confirmed that our results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study highlighted the comparison of digital and manual stereopsis tests. We obtained different stereo acuity values from both tests on the same individuals. Hence, the manual test gave better values of stereopsis than the digital test.","PeriodicalId":45690,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Manual and Digital Methods and Stereopsis Assessment in Young Adults\",\"authors\":\". Gul e Lala, Nashrah Imtiaz, Arsham Ikram, Anusha Sheraz, Qurat ul Ain, Sawera Ammad, Mawra Zahid\",\"doi\":\"10.54393/pjhs.v4i09.1024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reduced stereopsis or depth perception may be the early indicator of abnormal motor functions in people therefore, the stereopsis test is considered ideal for visual screening. It can accomplish the need for the assessment of stereopsis by using a cost-effective smartphone application. Objective: To compare the stereo acuity values of manual and digital stereopsis tests by using the Random Dot Stereo Acuity test with Lea Symbols (Manual) and the SAT App for Android (Digital). Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in the Eye department at The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital from February 2023 to May 2023. A total of 62 subjects aged 15-35 years were included in our study, out of which 31 were emmetropes and 31 were ametropes. Screening of subjects was done which included torch light examination and basic refraction. Manually stereopsis was measured using Random Dot stereo acuity test with Lea symbols and digitally it was measured by SAT application. Results: The mean ± SD stereo acuity value of the manual test (N=62) was 60.5242 ± 36.47607 seconds of arc and the mean stereo acuity value of the digital test (N=62) was 70.0968 ± 28.29569 seconds of arc. P-value was 0.006 which confirmed that our results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study highlighted the comparison of digital and manual stereopsis tests. We obtained different stereo acuity values from both tests on the same individuals. Hence, the manual test gave better values of stereopsis than the digital test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i09.1024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i09.1024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

立体视觉或深度感知能力下降可能是人类运动功能异常的早期指标,因此,立体视觉测试被认为是视觉筛查的理想选择。它可以通过使用具有成本效益的智能手机应用程序来完成对立体视觉评估的需要。目的:采用Lea Symbols (manual)和SAT App for Android (digital)进行随机点立体视敏度测试,比较手动立体视敏度和数字立体视敏度的差异。方法:于2023年2月至2023年5月在拉合尔大学教学医院眼科进行比较横断面研究。我们的研究共纳入了62名年龄在15-35岁之间的受试者,其中31名为正异性,31名为变异性。筛选受试者,包括火炬光检查和基本折射。人工立体视觉测量采用Lea符号随机点立体视敏度测试,数字立体视觉测量采用SAT软件。结果:手工测试(N=62)的平均±SD立体视敏值为60.5242±36.47607秒弧,数字测试(N=62)的平均立体视敏值为70.0968±28.29569秒弧。p值为0.006,证实我们的结果具有统计学意义。结论:我们的研究强调了数字和手动立体视觉测试的比较。我们从同一个体的两次测试中获得了不同的立体敏锐度值。因此,与数字测试相比,手动测试给出了更好的立体视觉值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Manual and Digital Methods and Stereopsis Assessment in Young Adults
Reduced stereopsis or depth perception may be the early indicator of abnormal motor functions in people therefore, the stereopsis test is considered ideal for visual screening. It can accomplish the need for the assessment of stereopsis by using a cost-effective smartphone application. Objective: To compare the stereo acuity values of manual and digital stereopsis tests by using the Random Dot Stereo Acuity test with Lea Symbols (Manual) and the SAT App for Android (Digital). Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in the Eye department at The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital from February 2023 to May 2023. A total of 62 subjects aged 15-35 years were included in our study, out of which 31 were emmetropes and 31 were ametropes. Screening of subjects was done which included torch light examination and basic refraction. Manually stereopsis was measured using Random Dot stereo acuity test with Lea symbols and digitally it was measured by SAT application. Results: The mean ± SD stereo acuity value of the manual test (N=62) was 60.5242 ± 36.47607 seconds of arc and the mean stereo acuity value of the digital test (N=62) was 70.0968 ± 28.29569 seconds of arc. P-value was 0.006 which confirmed that our results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study highlighted the comparison of digital and manual stereopsis tests. We obtained different stereo acuity values from both tests on the same individuals. Hence, the manual test gave better values of stereopsis than the digital test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences is an international biomedical journal from Pakistan. We publish materials of interest to the practitioners and scientists in the broad field of medicine. Articles describing original qualitative, quantitative, human/animal clinical or laboratory studies are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信