批判性思维和民主的条件

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Education Policy Analysis Archives Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.14507/epaa.31.8062

Nicholas C. Burbules

{"title":"批判性思维和民主的条件","authors":"Nicholas C. Burbules","doi":"10.14507/epaa.31.8062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often argued, rightly, that critical thinking is a necessary condition for democracy. This essay looks at the other side of that relationship, how certain democratic conditions are necessary for critical thinking to flourish. In turn, this dynamic, interactive account of democratic culture, institutions, and dispositions has implications for how we think about critical thinking itself.","PeriodicalId":11429,"journal":{"name":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical thinking and the conditions of democracy\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas C. Burbules\",\"doi\":\"10.14507/epaa.31.8062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is often argued, rightly, that critical thinking is a necessary condition for democracy. This essay looks at the other side of that relationship, how certain democratic conditions are necessary for critical thinking to flourish. In turn, this dynamic, interactive account of democratic culture, institutions, and dispositions has implications for how we think about critical thinking itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Policy Analysis Archives\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Policy Analysis Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.8062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.8062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人们经常正确地认为，批判性思维是民主的必要条件。本文着眼于这种关系的另一面，即某些民主条件对于批判性思维的蓬勃发展是多么必要。反过来，这种对民主文化、制度和倾向的动态、互动的描述对我们如何看待批判性思维本身也有影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Critical thinking and the conditions of democracy

It is often argued, rightly, that critical thinking is a necessary condition for democracy. This essay looks at the other side of that relationship, how certain democratic conditions are necessary for critical thinking to flourish. In turn, this dynamic, interactive account of democratic culture, institutions, and dispositions has implications for how we think about critical thinking itself.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Education Policy Analysis Archives Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

164

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas/Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas (EPAA/AAPE) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, international, multilingual, and multidisciplinary journal designed for researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and development analysts concerned with education policies. EPAA/AAPE accepts unpublished original manuscripts in English, Spanish and Portuguese without restriction as to conceptual and methodological perspectives, time or place. Accordingly, EPAA/AAPE does not have a pre-determined number of articles to be rejected and/or published. Rather, the editorial team believes that the quality of the journal should be assessed based on the articles that we publish and not the percentage of articles that we reject. For EPAA “inclusiveness” is a key criteria of manuscript quality. EPAA/AAPE publishes articles and special issues at roughly weekly intervals, all of which pertain to educational policy, with direct implications for educational policy. Priority is given to empirical articles. The Editorial Board may also consider other forms of educational policy-relevant articles such as: -methodological or theoretical articles -commentaries -systematic literature reviews