政治风险:解读国际背景。

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rafael Guillermo García Cáceres, Claudia Paola García Castiblanco
{"title":"政治风险:解读国际背景。","authors":"Rafael Guillermo García Cáceres, Claudia Paola García Castiblanco","doi":"10.17981/ingecuc.19.2.2023.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Since the beginning of the economic opening processes in the 1990s, investment flows have increased (FDI) worldwide. However, not all countries are proposed as ideal destinations for recipients of FDI, it must have an attractive economic, political and social landscape.
 Objetive: This research has the objective of studying the influence that the political risk may have on the decision-making on the subject of FDI by entrepreneurs, in particular, Colombians
 Methodology: The areas from where it has been analyzed, a series of low criteria is proposed. Is considered. It has been analyzed, a scale of value has been generated for each one, through those that have been studied. Means of stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis.
 Results: The feasible weight space results point at the United States as the best destination for Colombian investment, followed by Brazil, the United Kingdom and Chile; while Panama, Spain and Mexico are not favored by any weighting.
 Conclusions: This work might be helpful in decision-making processes intended to reduce the uncertainty that is proper of the external environment.","PeriodicalId":41463,"journal":{"name":"INGE CUC","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLITICAL RISK: INTERPRETING THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Guillermo García Cáceres, Claudia Paola García Castiblanco\",\"doi\":\"10.17981/ingecuc.19.2.2023.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Since the beginning of the economic opening processes in the 1990s, investment flows have increased (FDI) worldwide. However, not all countries are proposed as ideal destinations for recipients of FDI, it must have an attractive economic, political and social landscape.
 Objetive: This research has the objective of studying the influence that the political risk may have on the decision-making on the subject of FDI by entrepreneurs, in particular, Colombians
 Methodology: The areas from where it has been analyzed, a series of low criteria is proposed. Is considered. It has been analyzed, a scale of value has been generated for each one, through those that have been studied. Means of stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis.
 Results: The feasible weight space results point at the United States as the best destination for Colombian investment, followed by Brazil, the United Kingdom and Chile; while Panama, Spain and Mexico are not favored by any weighting.
 Conclusions: This work might be helpful in decision-making processes intended to reduce the uncertainty that is proper of the external environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INGE CUC\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INGE CUC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.19.2.2023.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INGE CUC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.19.2.2023.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:自20世纪90年代经济开放进程开始以来,全球投资流量(FDI)有所增加。然而,并非所有国家都被提议为外国直接投资接受国的理想目的地,它必须具有具有吸引力的经济、政治和社会景观。目的:本研究的目的是研究政治风险可能对企业家,特别是哥伦比亚人对外国直接投资主题的决策产生的影响 方法:从已经分析的领域,提出了一系列低标准。被认为是。它已经被分析过了,通过那些已经被研究过的,每一个都产生了一个价值尺度。随机多准则可接受性分析方法 结果:可行权重空间结果表明,美国是哥伦比亚投资的最佳目的地,其次是巴西、英国和智利;而巴拿马、西班牙和墨西哥则不受任何权重的青睐。结论:本研究可能有助于减少外部环境的不确定性的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POLITICAL RISK: INTERPRETING THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT.
Introduction: Since the beginning of the economic opening processes in the 1990s, investment flows have increased (FDI) worldwide. However, not all countries are proposed as ideal destinations for recipients of FDI, it must have an attractive economic, political and social landscape. Objetive: This research has the objective of studying the influence that the political risk may have on the decision-making on the subject of FDI by entrepreneurs, in particular, Colombians Methodology: The areas from where it has been analyzed, a series of low criteria is proposed. Is considered. It has been analyzed, a scale of value has been generated for each one, through those that have been studied. Means of stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Results: The feasible weight space results point at the United States as the best destination for Colombian investment, followed by Brazil, the United Kingdom and Chile; while Panama, Spain and Mexico are not favored by any weighting. Conclusions: This work might be helpful in decision-making processes intended to reduce the uncertainty that is proper of the external environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
INGE CUC
INGE CUC ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信