对公开呼吁实施恐怖主义行为的个人免除惩罚的特殊性

V. Konopelskyi, I. Chekmaryova
{"title":"对公开呼吁实施恐怖主义行为的个人免除惩罚的特殊性","authors":"V. Konopelskyi, I. Chekmaryova","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is a study of the peculiarities of exemption from punishment for individuals who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act. Specifically, it was established that a terrorist act involves violent activities or violence carried out with the intention to instill fear, panic, threaten lives, health, and safety of people, or to intimidate by using civilians as human shields or armed means. Terrorist acts are usually aimed at achieving political, religious, ideological, or social goals and can be perpetrated by individuals, groups, or organizations. The criminal responsibility for committing a terrorist act is governed by Article 258 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.Furthermore, the article specifies that the crime defined in Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, «Public Calls to Commit a Terrorist Act,» is characterized by the special intent of disseminating materials inciting terrorist acts. According to Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, those who make public calls to commit a terrorist act may face not only imprisonment but also corrective labor or arrest.The study concludes that a systemic analysis of general types of exemption from criminal liability, as provided in Articles 45–49 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, allows for their application to individuals who have committed terrorist offenses. Thus, the provisions for exemption from criminal liability based on personal surety (Article 47 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and exemption due to a change in circumstances (Article 48 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) can be applied to individuals who have been involved in committing a terrorist act (Part 1 of Article 258–1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and those who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act (Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).Consequently, legislative compromise regarding terrorist offenses represents a special form of criminal law impact. Within the realm of criminal law regulation of specific forms of exemption from criminal liability for committing terrorist offenses, there are ongoing scientific discussions, which discern the rational basis of scientific assertions, enabling a more rational implementation of legislative compromise concerning these crimes.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The peculiarities of exemption from punishment for individuals who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act\",\"authors\":\"V. Konopelskyi, I. Chekmaryova\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is a study of the peculiarities of exemption from punishment for individuals who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act. Specifically, it was established that a terrorist act involves violent activities or violence carried out with the intention to instill fear, panic, threaten lives, health, and safety of people, or to intimidate by using civilians as human shields or armed means. Terrorist acts are usually aimed at achieving political, religious, ideological, or social goals and can be perpetrated by individuals, groups, or organizations. The criminal responsibility for committing a terrorist act is governed by Article 258 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.Furthermore, the article specifies that the crime defined in Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, «Public Calls to Commit a Terrorist Act,» is characterized by the special intent of disseminating materials inciting terrorist acts. According to Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, those who make public calls to commit a terrorist act may face not only imprisonment but also corrective labor or arrest.The study concludes that a systemic analysis of general types of exemption from criminal liability, as provided in Articles 45–49 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, allows for their application to individuals who have committed terrorist offenses. Thus, the provisions for exemption from criminal liability based on personal surety (Article 47 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and exemption due to a change in circumstances (Article 48 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) can be applied to individuals who have been involved in committing a terrorist act (Part 1 of Article 258–1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and those who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act (Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).Consequently, legislative compromise regarding terrorist offenses represents a special form of criminal law impact. Within the realm of criminal law regulation of specific forms of exemption from criminal liability for committing terrorist offenses, there are ongoing scientific discussions, which discern the rational basis of scientific assertions, enabling a more rational implementation of legislative compromise concerning these crimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对公开呼吁实施恐怖主义行为的个人免于惩罚的特殊性的研究。具体而言,已确定恐怖主义行为涉及暴力活动或暴力行为,其目的是灌输恐惧、恐慌,威胁人民的生命、健康和安全,或利用平民作为人体盾牌或武装手段进行恐吓。恐怖主义行为通常旨在实现政治、宗教、意识形态或社会目标,可以由个人、团体或组织实施。实施恐怖主义行为的刑事责任由《乌克兰刑法》第258条规定。此外,该条规定,乌克兰刑法第258-2条“公开呼吁实施恐怖主义行为”所界定的犯罪,其特点是传播煽动恐怖主义行为的材料的特殊意图。根据乌克兰刑法第258-2条,公开呼吁实施恐怖主义行为的人不仅可能面临监禁,还可能面临劳改或逮捕。这项研究的结论是,对乌克兰刑法第45-49条所规定的一般类型的刑事责任豁免进行系统分析后,可以将其适用于犯下恐怖主义罪行的个人。因此,免于刑事责任规定基于个人担保(第四十七条刑法的乌克兰)和豁免的变化情况(刑法第四十八条的乌克兰)可以应用于个人参与实施恐怖行动(258 - 1条的第1部分刑法乌克兰)和那些已经公开呼吁提交一次恐怖行动(258 - 2条刑法乌克兰)。因此,关于恐怖主义犯罪的立法妥协是刑法影响的一种特殊形式。在刑法对恐怖主义犯罪免除刑事责任的具体形式进行规范的领域内,正在进行科学的探讨,辨别科学主张的合理依据,使恐怖主义犯罪的立法折衷更加合理地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The peculiarities of exemption from punishment for individuals who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act
The article is a study of the peculiarities of exemption from punishment for individuals who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act. Specifically, it was established that a terrorist act involves violent activities or violence carried out with the intention to instill fear, panic, threaten lives, health, and safety of people, or to intimidate by using civilians as human shields or armed means. Terrorist acts are usually aimed at achieving political, religious, ideological, or social goals and can be perpetrated by individuals, groups, or organizations. The criminal responsibility for committing a terrorist act is governed by Article 258 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.Furthermore, the article specifies that the crime defined in Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, «Public Calls to Commit a Terrorist Act,» is characterized by the special intent of disseminating materials inciting terrorist acts. According to Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, those who make public calls to commit a terrorist act may face not only imprisonment but also corrective labor or arrest.The study concludes that a systemic analysis of general types of exemption from criminal liability, as provided in Articles 45–49 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, allows for their application to individuals who have committed terrorist offenses. Thus, the provisions for exemption from criminal liability based on personal surety (Article 47 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and exemption due to a change in circumstances (Article 48 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) can be applied to individuals who have been involved in committing a terrorist act (Part 1 of Article 258–1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and those who have made public calls to commit a terrorist act (Article 258–2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).Consequently, legislative compromise regarding terrorist offenses represents a special form of criminal law impact. Within the realm of criminal law regulation of specific forms of exemption from criminal liability for committing terrorist offenses, there are ongoing scientific discussions, which discern the rational basis of scientific assertions, enabling a more rational implementation of legislative compromise concerning these crimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信