瞳孔扩张作为考生答题认知负荷的指标:不同方法的比较研究

IF 1.9 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Mind Brain and Education Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1111/mbe.12388

Tzu‐Hua Wang, Chien‐Hui Kao

{"title":"瞳孔扩张作为考生答题认知负荷的指标:不同方法的比较研究","authors":"Tzu‐Hua Wang, Chien‐Hui Kao","doi":"10.1111/mbe.12388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies have demonstrated that task‐evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) can be adopted to measure the examinee's cognitive load. This study compared three approaches for the measurement of TEPRs, mean pupil diameter, mean pupil dilation, and mean percentage of pupil dilation, to determine the best‐fit measuring method. The valid participants of this study were eight sixth‐grade elementary students. The experimental materials used were two mathematics questions with differing difficulty. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was employed to compare the goodness of fit of each approach. The results revealed that the measurement of TEPRs based on the mean percentage of pupil dilation measured every 4 s provided the best fit.","PeriodicalId":51595,"journal":{"name":"Mind Brain and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupil Dilation as an Index of Examinee's Cognitive Load in Answering a Mathematics Question: A Comparison Study of Different Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Tzu‐Hua Wang, Chien‐Hui Kao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mbe.12388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Studies have demonstrated that task‐evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) can be adopted to measure the examinee's cognitive load. This study compared three approaches for the measurement of TEPRs, mean pupil diameter, mean pupil dilation, and mean percentage of pupil dilation, to determine the best‐fit measuring method. The valid participants of this study were eight sixth‐grade elementary students. The experimental materials used were two mathematics questions with differing difficulty. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was employed to compare the goodness of fit of each approach. The results revealed that the measurement of TEPRs based on the mean percentage of pupil dilation measured every 4 s provided the best fit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mind Brain and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mind Brain and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12388\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind Brain and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明，任务诱发瞳孔反应(tepr)可以用来衡量考生的认知负荷。本研究比较了三种测量tepr的方法，即平均瞳孔直径、平均瞳孔扩张和平均瞳孔扩张百分比，以确定最适合的测量方法。本研究的有效被试为八名六年级小学生。实验材料是两道难度不同的数学题。采用广义估计方程(GEE)比较各方法的拟合优度。结果表明，基于每4 s测量瞳孔扩张的平均百分比的tepr测量是最合适的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Pupil Dilation as an Index of Examinee's Cognitive Load in Answering a Mathematics Question: A Comparison Study of Different Approaches

ABSTRACT Studies have demonstrated that task‐evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) can be adopted to measure the examinee's cognitive load. This study compared three approaches for the measurement of TEPRs, mean pupil diameter, mean pupil dilation, and mean percentage of pupil dilation, to determine the best‐fit measuring method. The valid participants of this study were eight sixth‐grade elementary students. The experimental materials used were two mathematics questions with differing difficulty. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was employed to compare the goodness of fit of each approach. The results revealed that the measurement of TEPRs based on the mean percentage of pupil dilation measured every 4 s provided the best fit.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Mind Brain and Education Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE), recognized as the 2007 Best New Journal in the Social Sciences & Humanities by the Association of American Publishers" Professional & Scholarly Publishing Division, provides a forum for the accessible presentation of basic and applied research on learning and development, including analyses from biology, cognitive science, and education. The journal grew out of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society"s mission to create a new field of mind, brain and education, with educators and researchers expertly collaborating in integrating the variety of fields connecting mind, brain, and education in research, theory, and/or practice.