համեմատականիրավԳԻՏՈՒթյան ծաԳՈՒՄն ՈՒ զաՐԳաՑՈՒՄԸ(պատմական զաՐԳաՑՄանհԻՄականՈՒղեԻՇնեՐԸ)

RAFAYEL VARDANYAN, ARMEN SHUKURYAN
{"title":"համեմատականիրավԳԻՏՈՒթյան ծաԳՈՒՄն ՈՒ զաՐԳաՑՈՒՄԸ(պատմական զաՐԳաՑՄանհԻՄականՈՒղեԻՇնեՐԸ)","authors":"RAFAYEL VARDANYAN, ARMEN SHUKURYAN","doi":"10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article the author has systematically analyzed the problems related to the origin and development of comparative jurisprudence in specific countries, in particular the origin and development of the idea of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world, the development of the views of comparative jurisprudence in the Middle Ages, the historical-philosophical aspects of comparative jurisprudence direction In Germany, the development of comparative jurisprudence in England and the USA, comparative jurisprudence in Russia, comparative jurisprudence in the first half of the 20th century, comparative jurisprudence in the period after World War 2, comparative jurisprudence and international scientific cooperation. The ideas of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world were more prominently manifested in the works of the philosophers of Ancient Athens and the lawyers of Ancient Rome, according to Western scholars, it was here that not only comparative-legal ideas were formed for the first time but also, in practice for the first time, an attempt was made to subject the state and law to comparative research. In the Middle Ages, the ideas of comparative jurisprudence had a certain development based on the borrowing (reception) of Roman law, the formation and coordination of canon law, as well as national legal system (mainly) on the basis of customary law. Comparative legal studies continued throughout the Middle Ages, up to modern times, when Montesquieu, Hugo Grotius, Pufendorf, and others succeeded one another. In the new and modern period, comperative legal researches not only multiplied in therms of volume, but also took on a systematic nature and was gradually formed as an independent legal science.","PeriodicalId":174588,"journal":{"name":"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ՀԱՄԵՄԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԻՐԱՎԱԳԻՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԾԱԳՈՒՄՆ ՈՒ ԶԱՐԳԱՑՈՒՄԸ (ՊԱՏՄԱԿԱՆ ԶԱՐԳԱՑՄԱՆ ՀԻՄՆԱԿԱՆ ՈՒՂԵՆԻՇՆԵՐԸ)\",\"authors\":\"RAFAYEL VARDANYAN, ARMEN SHUKURYAN\",\"doi\":\"10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article the author has systematically analyzed the problems related to the origin and development of comparative jurisprudence in specific countries, in particular the origin and development of the idea of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world, the development of the views of comparative jurisprudence in the Middle Ages, the historical-philosophical aspects of comparative jurisprudence direction In Germany, the development of comparative jurisprudence in England and the USA, comparative jurisprudence in Russia, comparative jurisprudence in the first half of the 20th century, comparative jurisprudence in the period after World War 2, comparative jurisprudence and international scientific cooperation. The ideas of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world were more prominently manifested in the works of the philosophers of Ancient Athens and the lawyers of Ancient Rome, according to Western scholars, it was here that not only comparative-legal ideas were formed for the first time but also, in practice for the first time, an attempt was made to subject the state and law to comparative research. In the Middle Ages, the ideas of comparative jurisprudence had a certain development based on the borrowing (reception) of Roman law, the formation and coordination of canon law, as well as national legal system (mainly) on the basis of customary law. Comparative legal studies continued throughout the Middle Ages, up to modern times, when Montesquieu, Hugo Grotius, Pufendorf, and others succeeded one another. In the new and modern period, comperative legal researches not only multiplied in therms of volume, but also took on a systematic nature and was gradually formed as an independent legal science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文系统地分析了比较法学在特定国家的起源和发展的有关问题,特别是古代世界比较法学思想的起源和发展、中世纪比较法学观点的发展、德国比较法学方向的历史哲学方面、英国和美国比较法学的发展、欧洲比较法学的发展、欧洲比较法学的发展、欧洲比较法学的发展等问题。俄罗斯的比较法学、20世纪上半叶的比较法学、二战后的比较法学、比较法学与国际科学合作。古代世界的比较法学思想在古代雅典哲学家和古罗马法学家的著作中得到了较为突出的体现,西方学者认为,在这里不仅第一次形成了比较法学思想,而且在实践中第一次尝试将国家和法律置于比较研究的对象之中。在中世纪,比较法学的思想在借鉴(接受)罗马法、教会法的形成和协调以及以习惯法为基础的(主要是)国家法律体系的基础上有了一定的发展。比较法研究贯穿整个中世纪,一直持续到近代,直到孟德斯鸠、雨果·格劳秀斯、普芬多夫等人相继兴起。新近代以来,比较法学研究不仅在数量上成倍增长,而且呈现出系统的性质,并逐渐形成一门独立的法学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ՀԱՄԵՄԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԻՐԱՎԱԳԻՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԾԱԳՈՒՄՆ ՈՒ ԶԱՐԳԱՑՈՒՄԸ (ՊԱՏՄԱԿԱՆ ԶԱՐԳԱՑՄԱՆ ՀԻՄՆԱԿԱՆ ՈՒՂԵՆԻՇՆԵՐԸ)
In this article the author has systematically analyzed the problems related to the origin and development of comparative jurisprudence in specific countries, in particular the origin and development of the idea of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world, the development of the views of comparative jurisprudence in the Middle Ages, the historical-philosophical aspects of comparative jurisprudence direction In Germany, the development of comparative jurisprudence in England and the USA, comparative jurisprudence in Russia, comparative jurisprudence in the first half of the 20th century, comparative jurisprudence in the period after World War 2, comparative jurisprudence and international scientific cooperation. The ideas of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world were more prominently manifested in the works of the philosophers of Ancient Athens and the lawyers of Ancient Rome, according to Western scholars, it was here that not only comparative-legal ideas were formed for the first time but also, in practice for the first time, an attempt was made to subject the state and law to comparative research. In the Middle Ages, the ideas of comparative jurisprudence had a certain development based on the borrowing (reception) of Roman law, the formation and coordination of canon law, as well as national legal system (mainly) on the basis of customary law. Comparative legal studies continued throughout the Middle Ages, up to modern times, when Montesquieu, Hugo Grotius, Pufendorf, and others succeeded one another. In the new and modern period, comperative legal researches not only multiplied in therms of volume, but also took on a systematic nature and was gradually formed as an independent legal science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信