焦虑障碍的分类和维度方法:具有重叠特征的离散实体的讨论

{"title":"焦虑障碍的分类和维度方法:具有重叠特征的离散实体的讨论","authors":"","doi":"10.25236/fsst.2023.051507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": There has been a long debate about whether mental disorders should be classified in the categorical or dimensional approaches. This article aims to provide a new perspective on the different classification approaches of one common mental health disorder — anxiety disorder. The essay reflects on both empirical evidence and theoretical models that discuss reliability, utility, and validity as well as various classical treatments of the different classification models. More specifically, this essay analyses several sorts of commonly used psychological models like cognitive models, emotion dysregulation models, and clinical staging models to discuss whether there are discrete entities with overlapping features of anxiety disorder. The results reflect that the categorical approach is sometimes untenable in clinical treatment due to drawbacks like time limitation, lack of experience, and less knowledge of the cut-off points. Moreover, this article suggested that although anxiety disorders are somewhat discrete when doing clinical diagnoses, they share overlapping features and characteristics with other disorders and other anxiety disorders. In conclusion, a more advanced and well-established system is needed to characterize mental disorders such as anxiety disorders in the future.","PeriodicalId":499539,"journal":{"name":"The Frontiers of Society Science and Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Categorical and Dimensional Approaches of Anxiety Disorders: A Discussion of Discrete Entities with Overlapping Features\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.25236/fsst.2023.051507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": There has been a long debate about whether mental disorders should be classified in the categorical or dimensional approaches. This article aims to provide a new perspective on the different classification approaches of one common mental health disorder — anxiety disorder. The essay reflects on both empirical evidence and theoretical models that discuss reliability, utility, and validity as well as various classical treatments of the different classification models. More specifically, this essay analyses several sorts of commonly used psychological models like cognitive models, emotion dysregulation models, and clinical staging models to discuss whether there are discrete entities with overlapping features of anxiety disorder. The results reflect that the categorical approach is sometimes untenable in clinical treatment due to drawbacks like time limitation, lack of experience, and less knowledge of the cut-off points. Moreover, this article suggested that although anxiety disorders are somewhat discrete when doing clinical diagnoses, they share overlapping features and characteristics with other disorders and other anxiety disorders. In conclusion, a more advanced and well-established system is needed to characterize mental disorders such as anxiety disorders in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Frontiers of Society Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Frontiers of Society Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25236/fsst.2023.051507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Frontiers of Society Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25236/fsst.2023.051507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Categorical and Dimensional Approaches of Anxiety Disorders: A Discussion of Discrete Entities with Overlapping Features
: There has been a long debate about whether mental disorders should be classified in the categorical or dimensional approaches. This article aims to provide a new perspective on the different classification approaches of one common mental health disorder — anxiety disorder. The essay reflects on both empirical evidence and theoretical models that discuss reliability, utility, and validity as well as various classical treatments of the different classification models. More specifically, this essay analyses several sorts of commonly used psychological models like cognitive models, emotion dysregulation models, and clinical staging models to discuss whether there are discrete entities with overlapping features of anxiety disorder. The results reflect that the categorical approach is sometimes untenable in clinical treatment due to drawbacks like time limitation, lack of experience, and less knowledge of the cut-off points. Moreover, this article suggested that although anxiety disorders are somewhat discrete when doing clinical diagnoses, they share overlapping features and characteristics with other disorders and other anxiety disorders. In conclusion, a more advanced and well-established system is needed to characterize mental disorders such as anxiety disorders in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信