前交叉韧带重建后单腿垂直跳跃与单腿跳跃的肢体对称指数:系统回顾和meta分析。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Li Wang, QingHong Xia, Tao Li, ZeYan Wang, Jian Li
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建后单腿垂直跳跃与单腿跳跃的肢体对称指数:系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Li Wang, QingHong Xia, Tao Li, ZeYan Wang, Jian Li","doi":"10.1177/19417381231205267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The limb symmetry index (LSI) is recommended as a milestone of return to play (RTP), and relying on the LSI value of a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) test may overestimate rehabilitation status. Identifying a more reliable functional test can help to carefully make decisions for RTP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to compare the LSI value of the SLHD test with that of a single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and determine which test provides lower LSI values.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 2022.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Observational studies with participants who had both SLHD and SLVJ tests after ACLR and LSI values of an SLHD and SLVJ were included. Disagreements were resolved after discussion between the 2 researchers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data on the primary outcomes (LSI values of the SLVJ and SLHD tests) were collected. Means and standard deviations (SDs) for each variable of interest were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A total of 587 patients underwent SLHD and SLVJ tests at different time points after ACLR. Compared with the SLHD test, the SLVJ test provided lower LSI values (SMD -0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.67 to -0.17). Subgroup analysis found that the SLVJ test provided a lower LSI value than the SLHD test in a specific period (approximately 7-18 months after ACLR, SMD -0.53; 95% CI -0.91 to -0.14) and a similar LSI value at other times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SLVJ test provided lower LSI values in a specific period (7-18 months after ACLR).</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limb Symmetry Index of Single-Leg Vertical Jump vs. Single-Leg Hop for Distance After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Li Wang, QingHong Xia, Tao Li, ZeYan Wang, Jian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381231205267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The limb symmetry index (LSI) is recommended as a milestone of return to play (RTP), and relying on the LSI value of a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) test may overestimate rehabilitation status. Identifying a more reliable functional test can help to carefully make decisions for RTP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to compare the LSI value of the SLHD test with that of a single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and determine which test provides lower LSI values.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 2022.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Observational studies with participants who had both SLHD and SLVJ tests after ACLR and LSI values of an SLHD and SLVJ were included. Disagreements were resolved after discussion between the 2 researchers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data on the primary outcomes (LSI values of the SLVJ and SLHD tests) were collected. Means and standard deviations (SDs) for each variable of interest were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A total of 587 patients underwent SLHD and SLVJ tests at different time points after ACLR. Compared with the SLHD test, the SLVJ test provided lower LSI values (SMD -0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.67 to -0.17). Subgroup analysis found that the SLVJ test provided a lower LSI value than the SLHD test in a specific period (approximately 7-18 months after ACLR, SMD -0.53; 95% CI -0.91 to -0.14) and a similar LSI value at other times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SLVJ test provided lower LSI values in a specific period (7-18 months after ACLR).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231205267\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231205267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肢体对称指数(LSI)被推荐作为恢复运动(RTP)的一个里程碑,依赖于单腿跳距离(SLHD)测试的LSI值可能会高估康复状态。确定一个更可靠的功能测试可以帮助仔细地为RTP做出决策。目的:比较SLHD试验与前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后单腿垂直跳(SLVJ)试验的LSI值,并确定哪种试验的LSI值更低。数据来源:PubMed, Web of Science, Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库从成立到2022年7月进行检索。研究选择:纳入了在SLHD和SLVJ的ACLR和LSI值之后同时进行SLHD和SLVJ测试的参与者的观察性研究。两位研究人员讨论后解决了分歧。研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析。证据等级:四级。数据提取:收集主要结局数据(SLVJ和SLHD试验的LSI值)。使用每个感兴趣变量的均值和标准差(sd)来计算标准化平均差异(SMDs)。结果:共有12项研究符合meta分析的纳入标准。共587例患者在ACLR术后不同时间点接受SLHD和SLVJ检测。与SLHD测试相比,SLVJ测试提供了更低的LSI值(SMD -0.42;95%置信区间(CI) -0.67 ~ -0.17)。亚组分析发现,SLVJ测试在特定时期内提供的LSI值低于SLHD测试(ACLR后约7-18个月,SMD -0.53;95% CI -0.91至-0.14),其他时间的LSI值相似。结论:SLVJ试验在特定时期(ACLR后7-18个月)提供较低的LSI值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limb Symmetry Index of Single-Leg Vertical Jump vs. Single-Leg Hop for Distance After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: The limb symmetry index (LSI) is recommended as a milestone of return to play (RTP), and relying on the LSI value of a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) test may overestimate rehabilitation status. Identifying a more reliable functional test can help to carefully make decisions for RTP.

Objective: The aim was to compare the LSI value of the SLHD test with that of a single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and determine which test provides lower LSI values.

Data sources: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 2022.

Study selection: Observational studies with participants who had both SLHD and SLVJ tests after ACLR and LSI values of an SLHD and SLVJ were included. Disagreements were resolved after discussion between the 2 researchers.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

Data extraction: Data on the primary outcomes (LSI values of the SLVJ and SLHD tests) were collected. Means and standard deviations (SDs) for each variable of interest were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs).

Results: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A total of 587 patients underwent SLHD and SLVJ tests at different time points after ACLR. Compared with the SLHD test, the SLVJ test provided lower LSI values (SMD -0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.67 to -0.17). Subgroup analysis found that the SLVJ test provided a lower LSI value than the SLHD test in a specific period (approximately 7-18 months after ACLR, SMD -0.53; 95% CI -0.91 to -0.14) and a similar LSI value at other times.

Conclusion: The SLVJ test provided lower LSI values in a specific period (7-18 months after ACLR).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信