Student - t、Welch s - t和Mann - Whitney U检验在I型错误率和检验功率方面的比较

M. Ergin, Ö. Koşkan
{"title":"Student - t、Welch s - t和Mann - Whitney U检验在I型错误率和检验功率方面的比较","authors":"M. Ergin, Ö. Koşkan","doi":"10.15316/sjafs.2023.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we compared the Student's t-test, Welch's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test, in terms of their type I error rate and statistical power when the assumptions of parametric tests are violated in different situations. Materials used in this study, consisted of random numbers generated using the Numpy library in the Python programming language. All random numbers were generated from a normal distribution with N (0, 1) parameters. Balanced and unbalanced experimental conditions were simulated 50 000 times for each combination. The study revealed that, in comparison to other tests, Welch’s t - test was particularly more conservative in terms of type I error rate. It was discovered that the Student-t test had higher power values than the Mann-Whitney U test, mainly when only a small sample size of observations was used for the analysis. This simulation study indicated that Welch’s t - test is robust for preserving type I error rate when the distribution is normal. Therefore, in practice, the use of Welch t-test is recommended based on the findings of this study. One of the recommendations of this study is that the tests in question should also be evaluated in cases where observations have different distributions.\n\n","PeriodicalId":125980,"journal":{"name":"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Student – t, Welch s t, and Mann – Whitney U Tests in Terms of Type I Error Rate and Test Power\",\"authors\":\"M. Ergin, Ö. Koşkan\",\"doi\":\"10.15316/sjafs.2023.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we compared the Student's t-test, Welch's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test, in terms of their type I error rate and statistical power when the assumptions of parametric tests are violated in different situations. Materials used in this study, consisted of random numbers generated using the Numpy library in the Python programming language. All random numbers were generated from a normal distribution with N (0, 1) parameters. Balanced and unbalanced experimental conditions were simulated 50 000 times for each combination. The study revealed that, in comparison to other tests, Welch’s t - test was particularly more conservative in terms of type I error rate. It was discovered that the Student-t test had higher power values than the Mann-Whitney U test, mainly when only a small sample size of observations was used for the analysis. This simulation study indicated that Welch’s t - test is robust for preserving type I error rate when the distribution is normal. Therefore, in practice, the use of Welch t-test is recommended based on the findings of this study. One of the recommendations of this study is that the tests in question should also be evaluated in cases where observations have different distributions.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":125980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15316/sjafs.2023.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15316/sjafs.2023.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了Student’st检验、Welch’st检验和Mann-Whitney U检验在不同情况下违反参数检验假设时的I型错误率和统计能力。本研究中使用的材料包括使用Python编程语言中的Numpy库生成的随机数。所有随机数都是由N(0,1)个参数的正态分布生成的。每种组合分别模拟平衡和不平衡实验条件5万次。研究表明,与其他检验相比,韦尔奇的t检验在I型错误率方面尤其保守。发现Student-t检验比Mann-Whitney U检验具有更高的功率值,主要是在仅使用少量观察样本进行分析时。仿真研究表明,当分布为正态分布时,韦尔奇t检验对于保持I型错误率具有鲁棒性。因此,在实践中,根据本研究的发现,建议使用Welch t检验。本研究的建议之一是,在观察结果具有不同分布的情况下,也应评估所讨论的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Student – t, Welch s t, and Mann – Whitney U Tests in Terms of Type I Error Rate and Test Power
In this study, we compared the Student's t-test, Welch's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test, in terms of their type I error rate and statistical power when the assumptions of parametric tests are violated in different situations. Materials used in this study, consisted of random numbers generated using the Numpy library in the Python programming language. All random numbers were generated from a normal distribution with N (0, 1) parameters. Balanced and unbalanced experimental conditions were simulated 50 000 times for each combination. The study revealed that, in comparison to other tests, Welch’s t - test was particularly more conservative in terms of type I error rate. It was discovered that the Student-t test had higher power values than the Mann-Whitney U test, mainly when only a small sample size of observations was used for the analysis. This simulation study indicated that Welch’s t - test is robust for preserving type I error rate when the distribution is normal. Therefore, in practice, the use of Welch t-test is recommended based on the findings of this study. One of the recommendations of this study is that the tests in question should also be evaluated in cases where observations have different distributions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信