{"title":"理解墨西哥经济专业的共识","authors":"Jorge L. Andere, Jorge Luis Canché Escamilla","doi":"10.24275/UAM/AZC/DCSH/AE/2019V34N86/ANDERE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"En este trabajo se explora el consenso en grupos de una poblacion definida de academicos de la Ciencia Economica en Mexico, en proposiciones sobre opiniones economicas, aspectos cientificos de la Economia y supuestos economicos. Se aplicaron procedimientos para determinar el consenso al interior y entre grupos, cuyos resultados indican que los encuestados que consideran que los economistas concuerdan en los asuntos fundamentales, tienden a exhibir mayores grados de consenso y ser mas favorables a una economia abierta y a la Economia Neoclasica, que aquellos que no creen en la existencia de dicho acuerdo. Los integrantes de ambos grupos apoyan politicas gubernamentales de intervencion en la economia, pero de tipo diferente. JEL: A11, A14, A20 Abstract In this paper, we explore consensus on economic opinions, economics’ scientific aspects, and economics assumptions, in groups of a well-defined population of economics academiccommunity in Mexico. We apply procedures to determine consensus within and between groups. Outcomes indicate that surveyed individuals which consider economists agree on fundamental issues tend to exhibit both higher degrees of consensus as more favorable views towards open economy and neoclassical economics, than those which do not consider economists agree on fundamental issues. Members of both groups support state interventions in the economy, but of a different kind. JEL: A11, A14, A20","PeriodicalId":127265,"journal":{"name":"Análisis Económico","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entendiendo el consenso en la profesión económica en México\",\"authors\":\"Jorge L. Andere, Jorge Luis Canché Escamilla\",\"doi\":\"10.24275/UAM/AZC/DCSH/AE/2019V34N86/ANDERE\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"En este trabajo se explora el consenso en grupos de una poblacion definida de academicos de la Ciencia Economica en Mexico, en proposiciones sobre opiniones economicas, aspectos cientificos de la Economia y supuestos economicos. Se aplicaron procedimientos para determinar el consenso al interior y entre grupos, cuyos resultados indican que los encuestados que consideran que los economistas concuerdan en los asuntos fundamentales, tienden a exhibir mayores grados de consenso y ser mas favorables a una economia abierta y a la Economia Neoclasica, que aquellos que no creen en la existencia de dicho acuerdo. Los integrantes de ambos grupos apoyan politicas gubernamentales de intervencion en la economia, pero de tipo diferente. JEL: A11, A14, A20 Abstract In this paper, we explore consensus on economic opinions, economics’ scientific aspects, and economics assumptions, in groups of a well-defined population of economics academiccommunity in Mexico. We apply procedures to determine consensus within and between groups. Outcomes indicate that surveyed individuals which consider economists agree on fundamental issues tend to exhibit both higher degrees of consensus as more favorable views towards open economy and neoclassical economics, than those which do not consider economists agree on fundamental issues. Members of both groups support state interventions in the economy, but of a different kind. JEL: A11, A14, A20\",\"PeriodicalId\":127265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Análisis Económico\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Análisis Económico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24275/UAM/AZC/DCSH/AE/2019V34N86/ANDERE\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Análisis Económico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24275/UAM/AZC/DCSH/AE/2019V34N86/ANDERE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Entendiendo el consenso en la profesión económica en México
En este trabajo se explora el consenso en grupos de una poblacion definida de academicos de la Ciencia Economica en Mexico, en proposiciones sobre opiniones economicas, aspectos cientificos de la Economia y supuestos economicos. Se aplicaron procedimientos para determinar el consenso al interior y entre grupos, cuyos resultados indican que los encuestados que consideran que los economistas concuerdan en los asuntos fundamentales, tienden a exhibir mayores grados de consenso y ser mas favorables a una economia abierta y a la Economia Neoclasica, que aquellos que no creen en la existencia de dicho acuerdo. Los integrantes de ambos grupos apoyan politicas gubernamentales de intervencion en la economia, pero de tipo diferente. JEL: A11, A14, A20 Abstract In this paper, we explore consensus on economic opinions, economics’ scientific aspects, and economics assumptions, in groups of a well-defined population of economics academiccommunity in Mexico. We apply procedures to determine consensus within and between groups. Outcomes indicate that surveyed individuals which consider economists agree on fundamental issues tend to exhibit both higher degrees of consensus as more favorable views towards open economy and neoclassical economics, than those which do not consider economists agree on fundamental issues. Members of both groups support state interventions in the economy, but of a different kind. JEL: A11, A14, A20