关于总统国家政策的论战

Efriza Efriza
{"title":"关于总统国家政策的论战","authors":"Efriza Efriza","doi":"10.55745/jwbp.v4i2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains the problem between the State Policy and the Outlines of State Policy (GBHN), which also explains the differences between the 1945 Constitution before and after the amendment. After the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution has placed the principle of constitutional supremacy replacing parliamentary supremacy. But the polemic is present in the community, regarding the absence of State Policy that the state's development plan is considered inconsistent and sustainable because it is only based on the vision and mission of the presidential candidates during the campaign. While the desire to bring back the GBHN is because it considers that with the existence of the GBHN, the country's strategic development is no longer determined by the tastes and interests of the regime it self.\n \n\nDAFTAR PUSTAKA\nBukuAsshiddiqie, Jimly, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.Bo’a, Fais Yonas, UUD 1945 MPR dan Keniscayaan Amandemen: Terkait Kewenangan Konstitutif MPR dan Kebutuhan Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2018.Gaffar, Janedjri M., Demokrasi Konstitusional: Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah UUD 1945, Jakarta: Konpress, 2012.Nazir, M., MetodePenelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.Nurdin, Nurliah, Komparasi Sistem Presidensial Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Rivalitas Kekuasaan Antara Presiden dan Legislatif (2004-2009), Jakarta: MIPI, 2012.Mas, Marwan, Hukum Konstitusi dan Kelembagaan Negara, Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018.Rohaniah, Yoyoh, dan Efriza, Pengantar Ilmu Politik: Kajian Mendasar Ilmu Politik, Malang: Intranspublishing, 2016.\nJurnalBiro Pengkajian MPR (Eds), Penguatan Sistem Demokrasi Pancasila, Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI, 2017.Indra J. Piliang, dan T.A. Legowo, (Eds), Disain Baru Sistem Politik Indonesia, Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2006.Moch. Nurhasim, Pembangunan Nasional Bukanlah Produk Rezim, dalam Jurnal Majelis, Haluan Negara Sebagai Arah dan Sasaran Pembangunan Nasional. Edisi 02/Februari 2018.\nData KualitatifHasil Wawancara, Maswadi Rauf, Ketua Tim Ahli Bidang Politik PAH I BP MPR 1999-2002, dan Dosen Ilmu Politik di Universitas Nasional (Unas), 19 Desember 2015, Jakarta.Hasil Wawancara, I Made Leo Wiratma, ahli hukum tata negara dan peneliti Forum Masyarakat Peduli Parlemen Indonesia (Formappi), tanggal 21 Desember 2015, Jakarta.Wawancara by phone, Sulardi, Dosen Hukum Tata Negara, di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, tanggal 31 Desember 2015.\n\n ","PeriodicalId":415656,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Wahana Bina Pemerintahan","volume":"440 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polemik Haluan Negara Bagi Presiden\",\"authors\":\"Efriza Efriza\",\"doi\":\"10.55745/jwbp.v4i2.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explains the problem between the State Policy and the Outlines of State Policy (GBHN), which also explains the differences between the 1945 Constitution before and after the amendment. After the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution has placed the principle of constitutional supremacy replacing parliamentary supremacy. But the polemic is present in the community, regarding the absence of State Policy that the state's development plan is considered inconsistent and sustainable because it is only based on the vision and mission of the presidential candidates during the campaign. While the desire to bring back the GBHN is because it considers that with the existence of the GBHN, the country's strategic development is no longer determined by the tastes and interests of the regime it self.\\n \\n\\nDAFTAR PUSTAKA\\nBukuAsshiddiqie, Jimly, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.Bo’a, Fais Yonas, UUD 1945 MPR dan Keniscayaan Amandemen: Terkait Kewenangan Konstitutif MPR dan Kebutuhan Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2018.Gaffar, Janedjri M., Demokrasi Konstitusional: Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah UUD 1945, Jakarta: Konpress, 2012.Nazir, M., MetodePenelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.Nurdin, Nurliah, Komparasi Sistem Presidensial Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Rivalitas Kekuasaan Antara Presiden dan Legislatif (2004-2009), Jakarta: MIPI, 2012.Mas, Marwan, Hukum Konstitusi dan Kelembagaan Negara, Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018.Rohaniah, Yoyoh, dan Efriza, Pengantar Ilmu Politik: Kajian Mendasar Ilmu Politik, Malang: Intranspublishing, 2016.\\nJurnalBiro Pengkajian MPR (Eds), Penguatan Sistem Demokrasi Pancasila, Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI, 2017.Indra J. Piliang, dan T.A. Legowo, (Eds), Disain Baru Sistem Politik Indonesia, Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2006.Moch. Nurhasim, Pembangunan Nasional Bukanlah Produk Rezim, dalam Jurnal Majelis, Haluan Negara Sebagai Arah dan Sasaran Pembangunan Nasional. Edisi 02/Februari 2018.\\nData KualitatifHasil Wawancara, Maswadi Rauf, Ketua Tim Ahli Bidang Politik PAH I BP MPR 1999-2002, dan Dosen Ilmu Politik di Universitas Nasional (Unas), 19 Desember 2015, Jakarta.Hasil Wawancara, I Made Leo Wiratma, ahli hukum tata negara dan peneliti Forum Masyarakat Peduli Parlemen Indonesia (Formappi), tanggal 21 Desember 2015, Jakarta.Wawancara by phone, Sulardi, Dosen Hukum Tata Negara, di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, tanggal 31 Desember 2015.\\n\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":415656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Wahana Bina Pemerintahan\",\"volume\":\"440 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Wahana Bina Pemerintahan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55745/jwbp.v4i2.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Wahana Bina Pemerintahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55745/jwbp.v4i2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文阐述了《国家政策纲要》与《国家政策纲要》之间存在的问题,并由此解释了1945年宪法修改前后的差异。1945年宪法修正案提出了宪法至上原则取代议会至上原则。但社区中也存在争议,认为缺乏州政策,州的发展计划被认为是不一致和可持续的,因为它只是基于总统候选人在竞选期间的愿景和使命。之所以希望恢复GBHN,是因为它认为有了GBHN,国家的战略发展不再由政权本身的口味和利益决定。DAFTAR pustakabukuashiddiqie, Jimly,《印尼宪政主义的宪政》,雅加达:Sinar Grafika, 2014。Bo 'a, Fais Yonas, UUD 1945, MPR dan Kebutuhan Amandemen: Terkait Kewenangan选区MPR dan Kebutuhan Amandemen Kelima, UUD 1945,日惹:Pustaka Pelajar, 2018。加法尔,Janedjri M.,《民主宪政:人民运动党(Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah) 1945》,雅加达:Konpress出版社,2012。Nazir, M., metopenelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003。《印尼总统与美国总统与立法机构(2004-2009)》,雅加达:印尼国际教育研究院,2012年。Mas, Marwan, Hukum Konstitusi dan Kelembagaan Negara, Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018。Rohaniah, yoyooh, dan Efriza, Pengantar Ilmu Politik: Kajian Mendasar Ilmu Politik, Malang:未出版,2016。《企鹅民主系统》,雅加达:巴丹彭卡建MPR, 2017。Indra J. Piliang, dan T.A. Legowo,(编),Disain Baru制度政治,雅加达:战略与国际研究中心,2006。Nurhasim, Pembangunan national Bukanlah Produk Rezim, dalam Jurnal Majelis, Haluan Negara Sebagai Arah dan Sasaran Pembangunan national。edii 02/二月2018。数据定性:hasil Wawancara, Maswadi Rauf, Ketua Tim Ahli Bidang Politik PAH I BP MPR 1999-2002, dan Dosen Ilmu Politik di Universitas national (Unas), 2015年12月19日,雅加达。Hasil Wawancara, I Made Leo Wiratma, ahli hukum tata negara dan peneliti论坛Masyarakat Peduli Parlemen印度尼西亚(Formappi), 2015年12月21日,雅加达。Wawancara通过电话,Sulardi, Dosen Hukum Tata Negara, di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2015年12月31日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polemik Haluan Negara Bagi Presiden
This paper explains the problem between the State Policy and the Outlines of State Policy (GBHN), which also explains the differences between the 1945 Constitution before and after the amendment. After the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution has placed the principle of constitutional supremacy replacing parliamentary supremacy. But the polemic is present in the community, regarding the absence of State Policy that the state's development plan is considered inconsistent and sustainable because it is only based on the vision and mission of the presidential candidates during the campaign. While the desire to bring back the GBHN is because it considers that with the existence of the GBHN, the country's strategic development is no longer determined by the tastes and interests of the regime it self.   DAFTAR PUSTAKA BukuAsshiddiqie, Jimly, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.Bo’a, Fais Yonas, UUD 1945 MPR dan Keniscayaan Amandemen: Terkait Kewenangan Konstitutif MPR dan Kebutuhan Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2018.Gaffar, Janedjri M., Demokrasi Konstitusional: Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah UUD 1945, Jakarta: Konpress, 2012.Nazir, M., MetodePenelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.Nurdin, Nurliah, Komparasi Sistem Presidensial Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Rivalitas Kekuasaan Antara Presiden dan Legislatif (2004-2009), Jakarta: MIPI, 2012.Mas, Marwan, Hukum Konstitusi dan Kelembagaan Negara, Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018.Rohaniah, Yoyoh, dan Efriza, Pengantar Ilmu Politik: Kajian Mendasar Ilmu Politik, Malang: Intranspublishing, 2016. JurnalBiro Pengkajian MPR (Eds), Penguatan Sistem Demokrasi Pancasila, Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI, 2017.Indra J. Piliang, dan T.A. Legowo, (Eds), Disain Baru Sistem Politik Indonesia, Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2006.Moch. Nurhasim, Pembangunan Nasional Bukanlah Produk Rezim, dalam Jurnal Majelis, Haluan Negara Sebagai Arah dan Sasaran Pembangunan Nasional. Edisi 02/Februari 2018. Data KualitatifHasil Wawancara, Maswadi Rauf, Ketua Tim Ahli Bidang Politik PAH I BP MPR 1999-2002, dan Dosen Ilmu Politik di Universitas Nasional (Unas), 19 Desember 2015, Jakarta.Hasil Wawancara, I Made Leo Wiratma, ahli hukum tata negara dan peneliti Forum Masyarakat Peduli Parlemen Indonesia (Formappi), tanggal 21 Desember 2015, Jakarta.Wawancara by phone, Sulardi, Dosen Hukum Tata Negara, di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, tanggal 31 Desember 2015.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信