{"title":"推进智力资本理论——若干未来之路","authors":"José Maria Viedma Martí, M. Cabrita","doi":"10.34190/eckm.24.2.1401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of intellectual capital theory has been guided by the ideas and thoughts of a handful of influential practitioners, including Sveiby (1997), Kaplan (Kaplan and Norton, 1992), and Edvinsson (Edvinson and Malone, 1997). These pioneers established the basis of the “intellectual capital standard theory”. More recently, other authors have advanced some contributions integrating an ecosystem approach in line with sustainability concerns. The present paper discusses the assumptions and principles that support the standard theory (the prevailing paradigm). The paper then introduces other models and methodologies as alternatives to the standard theory—such as the “Value Explorer” (Andriessen and Tissen, 2000) and the “Intellectual Capital Benchmarking System (ICBS)” (Viedma and Cabrita, 2012)—and examines the foundations and principles on which the alternative new theory (the ‘new paradigm’) is based. Finally, the paper attempts to synthesize both theoretical approaches with other new views and contributions and rises discussion avenues on the topic.","PeriodicalId":107011,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the Intellectual Capital Theory- Some Ways Forward\",\"authors\":\"José Maria Viedma Martí, M. Cabrita\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/eckm.24.2.1401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of intellectual capital theory has been guided by the ideas and thoughts of a handful of influential practitioners, including Sveiby (1997), Kaplan (Kaplan and Norton, 1992), and Edvinsson (Edvinson and Malone, 1997). These pioneers established the basis of the “intellectual capital standard theory”. More recently, other authors have advanced some contributions integrating an ecosystem approach in line with sustainability concerns. The present paper discusses the assumptions and principles that support the standard theory (the prevailing paradigm). The paper then introduces other models and methodologies as alternatives to the standard theory—such as the “Value Explorer” (Andriessen and Tissen, 2000) and the “Intellectual Capital Benchmarking System (ICBS)” (Viedma and Cabrita, 2012)—and examines the foundations and principles on which the alternative new theory (the ‘new paradigm’) is based. Finally, the paper attempts to synthesize both theoretical approaches with other new views and contributions and rises discussion avenues on the topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Conference on Knowledge Management\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Conference on Knowledge Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.2.1401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.2.1401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
智力资本理论的发展一直受到少数有影响力的实践者的观点和思想的指导,包括Sveiby(1997)、Kaplan (Kaplan and Norton, 1992)和Edvinson (Edvinson and Malone, 1997)。这些先驱者奠定了“智力资本标准理论”的基础。最近,其他作者提出了一些贡献,将生态系统方法与可持续性问题相结合。本文讨论了支持标准理论(流行范式)的假设和原则。然后,本文介绍了其他模型和方法作为标准理论的替代方案,如“价值探索者”(Andriessen和Tissen, 2000)和“智力资本基准系统(ICBS)”(Viedma和Cabrita, 2012),并研究了替代新理论(“新范式”)所依据的基础和原则。最后,本文试图将这两种理论方法与其他新的观点和贡献综合起来,并提出了关于该主题的讨论途径。
Advancing the Intellectual Capital Theory- Some Ways Forward
The development of intellectual capital theory has been guided by the ideas and thoughts of a handful of influential practitioners, including Sveiby (1997), Kaplan (Kaplan and Norton, 1992), and Edvinsson (Edvinson and Malone, 1997). These pioneers established the basis of the “intellectual capital standard theory”. More recently, other authors have advanced some contributions integrating an ecosystem approach in line with sustainability concerns. The present paper discusses the assumptions and principles that support the standard theory (the prevailing paradigm). The paper then introduces other models and methodologies as alternatives to the standard theory—such as the “Value Explorer” (Andriessen and Tissen, 2000) and the “Intellectual Capital Benchmarking System (ICBS)” (Viedma and Cabrita, 2012)—and examines the foundations and principles on which the alternative new theory (the ‘new paradigm’) is based. Finally, the paper attempts to synthesize both theoretical approaches with other new views and contributions and rises discussion avenues on the topic.