经皮耳迷走神经刺激的神经阴极阻滞效果评价

A. Samoudi, Tom Van de Steene, E. Tanghe, L. Martens, W. Joseph
{"title":"经皮耳迷走神经刺激的神经阴极阻滞效果评价","authors":"A. Samoudi, Tom Van de Steene, E. Tanghe, L. Martens, W. Joseph","doi":"10.23919/EMF-MED.2018.8526068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nerve cathodal block mechanism for the percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is investigated. The response of individual axons to stimulation will be assessed in terms of excitation, blocking and propagation of action potentials in order to optimize stimulation patterns. It was seen that the response obeyed the activating function remarkably well. The found sensitivity indices of the blocking threshold for variations in diameter and temperature (61 % and 15 % respectively) are significantly higher than for the excitation threshold. Finally, the threshold needed for cathodal block (around -5 V) is far from the amplitudes used to stimulate the nerves (around -1 V). More investigations by performing an uncertainty analysis varying axonal trajectories and electrode placement can lead to the conclusion that cathodal block is less likely to occur when stimulating with clinically used amplitudes in pVNS.","PeriodicalId":134768,"journal":{"name":"2018 EMF-Med 1st World Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF-Med)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of nerve cathodal block for the percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation\",\"authors\":\"A. Samoudi, Tom Van de Steene, E. Tanghe, L. Martens, W. Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/EMF-MED.2018.8526068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nerve cathodal block mechanism for the percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is investigated. The response of individual axons to stimulation will be assessed in terms of excitation, blocking and propagation of action potentials in order to optimize stimulation patterns. It was seen that the response obeyed the activating function remarkably well. The found sensitivity indices of the blocking threshold for variations in diameter and temperature (61 % and 15 % respectively) are significantly higher than for the excitation threshold. Finally, the threshold needed for cathodal block (around -5 V) is far from the amplitudes used to stimulate the nerves (around -1 V). More investigations by performing an uncertainty analysis varying axonal trajectories and electrode placement can lead to the conclusion that cathodal block is less likely to occur when stimulating with clinically used amplitudes in pVNS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 EMF-Med 1st World Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF-Med)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 EMF-Med 1st World Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF-Med)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/EMF-MED.2018.8526068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 EMF-Med 1st World Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF-Med)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/EMF-MED.2018.8526068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激的神经阴极阻滞机制。为了优化刺激模式,我们将根据动作电位的激发、阻断和传播来评估单个轴突对刺激的反应。结果表明,该反应非常服从激活函数。所发现的阻断阈值对直径和温度变化的敏感性指数(分别为61%和15%)显著高于激发阈值。最后,阴极阻滞所需的阈值(约-5 V)与刺激神经所用的振幅(约-1 V)相差甚远。通过对不同轴突轨迹和电极放置的不确定性分析,更多的研究可以得出结论,在临床上使用pVNS的振幅刺激时,阴极阻滞不太可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of nerve cathodal block for the percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
Nerve cathodal block mechanism for the percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is investigated. The response of individual axons to stimulation will be assessed in terms of excitation, blocking and propagation of action potentials in order to optimize stimulation patterns. It was seen that the response obeyed the activating function remarkably well. The found sensitivity indices of the blocking threshold for variations in diameter and temperature (61 % and 15 % respectively) are significantly higher than for the excitation threshold. Finally, the threshold needed for cathodal block (around -5 V) is far from the amplitudes used to stimulate the nerves (around -1 V). More investigations by performing an uncertainty analysis varying axonal trajectories and electrode placement can lead to the conclusion that cathodal block is less likely to occur when stimulating with clinically used amplitudes in pVNS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信