FlexiView实验工具:公平和详细的可用性测试的需求建模工具

Parisa Ghazi, M. Glinz
{"title":"FlexiView实验工具:公平和详细的可用性测试的需求建模工具","authors":"Parisa Ghazi, M. Glinz","doi":"10.1109/RE.2018.00069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enhancing the usability of tools such as requirements modeling tools requires several cycles of testing and improvement. Since this process is costly, it is usually ignored. In this paper, we present an experimental tool which we have developed with two goals: (i) comparing the usability of a new navigation technique for requirements artifacts called FlexiView with traditional zooming and scrolling, and (ii) developing a platform that enables fast implementation and fair usability comparisons of new navigation techniques while producing generalizable results.","PeriodicalId":445032,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FlexiView Experimental Tool: Fair and Detailed Usability Tests for Requirements Modeling Tools\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Ghazi, M. Glinz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2018.00069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Enhancing the usability of tools such as requirements modeling tools requires several cycles of testing and improvement. Since this process is costly, it is usually ignored. In this paper, we present an experimental tool which we have developed with two goals: (i) comparing the usability of a new navigation technique for requirements artifacts called FlexiView with traditional zooming and scrolling, and (ii) developing a platform that enables fast implementation and fair usability comparisons of new navigation techniques while producing generalizable results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

增强诸如需求建模工具之类的工具的可用性需要几个测试和改进周期。由于这个过程的成本很高,它通常被忽略。在本文中,我们提出了一个实验工具,我们已经开发了两个目标:(i)比较一个新的导航技术的可用性,称为flexview的需求工件与传统的缩放和滚动,(ii)开发一个平台,使快速实现和公平的可用性比较新的导航技术,同时产生可推广的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FlexiView Experimental Tool: Fair and Detailed Usability Tests for Requirements Modeling Tools
Enhancing the usability of tools such as requirements modeling tools requires several cycles of testing and improvement. Since this process is costly, it is usually ignored. In this paper, we present an experimental tool which we have developed with two goals: (i) comparing the usability of a new navigation technique for requirements artifacts called FlexiView with traditional zooming and scrolling, and (ii) developing a platform that enables fast implementation and fair usability comparisons of new navigation techniques while producing generalizable results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信