Innovative Perspectives of Nietzsche’s Political Philosophy in the Global Theory of Democracy

hat Nietzsche’s philosophy should be interpreted not as just a new philosophy among others, but also a philosophy of a “new type”, makes certainly a problem. In the case of a “political” philosophy, our “natural” innervations are looking toward a system, if not just toward a holistic philosophical system, from which then the “subsystem politics” should derive without any difficulty. In the case of not only non-systematical, but a-, if not just anti-systematical philosophy, the task to reconstruct the politics appears differently.1 The more intense we study the hermeneutics of Nietzsche’s politically implemented philosophical perspectives, the stronger will be our insight that Nietzsche’s political philosophy is not only worth a correct and total reconstruction, but can also renew our concept of the evolution of the political thought as well as contribute, at the same time, immediately to the intellectual solution of a range of new theoretical problems. Why might it have not been so for long, we can on the one hand give a response, while another deeper dimension of the answer is not yet guaranteed at all by new and adequate researches. Without a doubt, it is clear that the possibility of this new view immediately depends on a specific “dialectics of the compromise (Kompromittierung)”, on the “compromise of the compromise”, on Alfred Bauemler’s and Georg Lukács’ intellectual and moral disqualification.2 For a re-