{"title":"医生对病人的共情:伊朗教学医院的调查","authors":"A. Mohammadi, K. Kamali","doi":"10.15171/IJHR.2016.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Empathy is a key element of physician-patient relations, playing a significant role in effectiveness of health care. This study aimed to evaluate the level of empathy of specialist physicians and advise strategies to promote empathy. Methods: All 142 specialist physicians practicing in teaching hospitals of Zanjan City (Northern Iran) were surveyed. The 20-item Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) was used as the study tool. The answers were quantified on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Data were summarized using descriptive statistical methods. The mean values were compared by t-test and ANOVA. Findings: The overall empathy score averaged at 100.7 ± 17.7 falling within the moderate range (max = 140). While the highest score of the empathy dimensions was received by compassionate care (5.22) and the lowest score was belonged to standing in the patient’s shoes (4.89). Female physicians exhibited significantly higher empathy level (107.3 ± 15.6) compared to their male counterparts (96.4 ± 16.6) (P = 0.003). The empathy score mean was found to be significantly higher among physicians with human-mediatedspecialties (113.05 ± 16.2) as compared with technology mediated, tool-mediated, and non-primary care specialties which scored 98 ± 12.12, 98.2 ± 18.7, and 97.1 ± 15.9, respectively (F = 5.14, P = 0.002). Conclusions: The observed level of empathy among physicians indicates a large room for improvement, particularly among male doctors and technology/tool mediated specialties. Considering the crucial role of clinical empathy in patient satisfaction and outcome, our results recommend further studies to examine the issue on larger scales and devise intervention strategies if the observed gap will be confirmed.","PeriodicalId":178002,"journal":{"name":"international journal of hospital research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician Empathy towards Patients: A Survey in Iranian Teaching Hospitals\",\"authors\":\"A. Mohammadi, K. Kamali\",\"doi\":\"10.15171/IJHR.2016.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: Empathy is a key element of physician-patient relations, playing a significant role in effectiveness of health care. This study aimed to evaluate the level of empathy of specialist physicians and advise strategies to promote empathy. Methods: All 142 specialist physicians practicing in teaching hospitals of Zanjan City (Northern Iran) were surveyed. The 20-item Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) was used as the study tool. The answers were quantified on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Data were summarized using descriptive statistical methods. The mean values were compared by t-test and ANOVA. Findings: The overall empathy score averaged at 100.7 ± 17.7 falling within the moderate range (max = 140). While the highest score of the empathy dimensions was received by compassionate care (5.22) and the lowest score was belonged to standing in the patient’s shoes (4.89). Female physicians exhibited significantly higher empathy level (107.3 ± 15.6) compared to their male counterparts (96.4 ± 16.6) (P = 0.003). The empathy score mean was found to be significantly higher among physicians with human-mediatedspecialties (113.05 ± 16.2) as compared with technology mediated, tool-mediated, and non-primary care specialties which scored 98 ± 12.12, 98.2 ± 18.7, and 97.1 ± 15.9, respectively (F = 5.14, P = 0.002). Conclusions: The observed level of empathy among physicians indicates a large room for improvement, particularly among male doctors and technology/tool mediated specialties. Considering the crucial role of clinical empathy in patient satisfaction and outcome, our results recommend further studies to examine the issue on larger scales and devise intervention strategies if the observed gap will be confirmed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"international journal of hospital research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"international journal of hospital research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHR.2016.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international journal of hospital research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHR.2016.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:共情是医患关系的关键要素,对医疗服务的有效性起着重要作用。本研究旨在评估专科医师的共情水平,并提出提升共情的策略。方法:对伊朗北部赞詹市教学医院142名专科医师进行调查。采用20项Jefferson医师共情量表(JSPE)作为研究工具。答案被量化为李克特7分量表,范围从非常不同意(1)到非常同意(7)。数据使用描述性统计方法进行汇总。均值比较采用t检验和方差分析。结果:共情总分平均为100.7±17.7分,处于中等范围内(最高为140分)。共情维度得分最高的是同情护理(5.22分),最低的是站在病人的角度(4.89分)。女医师共情水平(107.3±15.6)显著高于男医师共情水平(96.4±16.6)(P = 0.003)。以人为中介专业的医生共情得分平均值(113.05±16.2)显著高于技术中介专业、工具中介专业和非初级保健专业的共情得分平均值(98±12.12、98.2±18.7和97.1±15.9)(F = 5.14, P = 0.002)。结论:观察到的医生共情水平表明有很大的改进空间,特别是在男性医生和技术/工具介导的专业。考虑到临床共情在患者满意度和结果中的关键作用,我们的研究结果建议进一步研究更大规模的问题,并在观察到的差距得到证实时制定干预策略。
Physician Empathy towards Patients: A Survey in Iranian Teaching Hospitals
Background and Objectives: Empathy is a key element of physician-patient relations, playing a significant role in effectiveness of health care. This study aimed to evaluate the level of empathy of specialist physicians and advise strategies to promote empathy. Methods: All 142 specialist physicians practicing in teaching hospitals of Zanjan City (Northern Iran) were surveyed. The 20-item Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) was used as the study tool. The answers were quantified on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Data were summarized using descriptive statistical methods. The mean values were compared by t-test and ANOVA. Findings: The overall empathy score averaged at 100.7 ± 17.7 falling within the moderate range (max = 140). While the highest score of the empathy dimensions was received by compassionate care (5.22) and the lowest score was belonged to standing in the patient’s shoes (4.89). Female physicians exhibited significantly higher empathy level (107.3 ± 15.6) compared to their male counterparts (96.4 ± 16.6) (P = 0.003). The empathy score mean was found to be significantly higher among physicians with human-mediatedspecialties (113.05 ± 16.2) as compared with technology mediated, tool-mediated, and non-primary care specialties which scored 98 ± 12.12, 98.2 ± 18.7, and 97.1 ± 15.9, respectively (F = 5.14, P = 0.002). Conclusions: The observed level of empathy among physicians indicates a large room for improvement, particularly among male doctors and technology/tool mediated specialties. Considering the crucial role of clinical empathy in patient satisfaction and outcome, our results recommend further studies to examine the issue on larger scales and devise intervention strategies if the observed gap will be confirmed.