关于平衡纪律和敏捷性的观察

B. Boehm, R. Turner
{"title":"关于平衡纪律和敏捷性的观察","authors":"B. Boehm, R. Turner","doi":"10.1109/ADC.2003.1231450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile development methodologies promise higher customer satisfaction, lower defect rates, faster development times and a solution to rapidly changing requirements. Plan-driven approaches promise predictability, stability, and high assurance. However, both approaches have shortcomings that, if left unaddressed, can lead to project failure. The challenge is to balance the two approaches to take advantage of their strengths and compensate for their weaknesses. We believe this can be accomplished using a risk-based approach for structuring projects to incorporate both agile and disciplined approaches in proportion to a project's needs. We present six observations drawn from our efforts to develop such an approach. We follow those observations with some practical advice to organizations seeking to integrate agile and plan-driven methods in their development process.","PeriodicalId":325418,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, 2003. ADC 2003","volume":"41 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"134","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations on balancing discipline and agility\",\"authors\":\"B. Boehm, R. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ADC.2003.1231450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agile development methodologies promise higher customer satisfaction, lower defect rates, faster development times and a solution to rapidly changing requirements. Plan-driven approaches promise predictability, stability, and high assurance. However, both approaches have shortcomings that, if left unaddressed, can lead to project failure. The challenge is to balance the two approaches to take advantage of their strengths and compensate for their weaknesses. We believe this can be accomplished using a risk-based approach for structuring projects to incorporate both agile and disciplined approaches in proportion to a project's needs. We present six observations drawn from our efforts to develop such an approach. We follow those observations with some practical advice to organizations seeking to integrate agile and plan-driven methods in their development process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, 2003. ADC 2003\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"134\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, 2003. ADC 2003\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ADC.2003.1231450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, 2003. ADC 2003","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ADC.2003.1231450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 134

摘要

敏捷开发方法承诺更高的客户满意度、更低的缺陷率、更快的开发时间和快速变化需求的解决方案。计划驱动的方法承诺可预测性、稳定性和高保证。然而,这两种方法都有缺点,如果不加以解决,可能会导致项目失败。我们面临的挑战是如何平衡这两种方法,以利用它们的优点并弥补它们的缺点。我们相信,使用基于风险的方法来构建项目,根据项目的需要将敏捷和有纪律的方法结合起来,可以实现这一点。我们提出了从我们开发这种方法的努力中得出的六个观察结果。根据这些观察,我们为那些寻求在开发过程中集成敏捷和计划驱动方法的组织提供了一些实用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observations on balancing discipline and agility
Agile development methodologies promise higher customer satisfaction, lower defect rates, faster development times and a solution to rapidly changing requirements. Plan-driven approaches promise predictability, stability, and high assurance. However, both approaches have shortcomings that, if left unaddressed, can lead to project failure. The challenge is to balance the two approaches to take advantage of their strengths and compensate for their weaknesses. We believe this can be accomplished using a risk-based approach for structuring projects to incorporate both agile and disciplined approaches in proportion to a project's needs. We present six observations drawn from our efforts to develop such an approach. We follow those observations with some practical advice to organizations seeking to integrate agile and plan-driven methods in their development process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信