高分辨率城市土地覆盖分类的机器学习方法:比较研究

Ranga Raju Vatsavai, E. Bright, V. Chandola, B. Bhaduri, A. Cheriyadat, J. Graesser
{"title":"高分辨率城市土地覆盖分类的机器学习方法:比较研究","authors":"Ranga Raju Vatsavai, E. Bright, V. Chandola, B. Bhaduri, A. Cheriyadat, J. Graesser","doi":"10.1145/1999320.1999331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of several machine learning approaches makes it difficult to identify a suitable classification technique for analyzing high-resolution remote sensing images. In this study, ten classification techniques were compared from five broad machine learning categories. Surprisingly, the performance of simple statistical classification schemes like maximum likelihood and Logistic regression over complex and recent techniques is very close. Given that these two classifiers require little input from the user, they should still be considered for most classification tasks. Multiple classifier systems is a good choice if the resources permit.","PeriodicalId":400763,"journal":{"name":"International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning approaches for high-resolution urban land cover classification: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Ranga Raju Vatsavai, E. Bright, V. Chandola, B. Bhaduri, A. Cheriyadat, J. Graesser\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1999320.1999331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proliferation of several machine learning approaches makes it difficult to identify a suitable classification technique for analyzing high-resolution remote sensing images. In this study, ten classification techniques were compared from five broad machine learning categories. Surprisingly, the performance of simple statistical classification schemes like maximum likelihood and Logistic regression over complex and recent techniques is very close. Given that these two classifiers require little input from the user, they should still be considered for most classification tasks. Multiple classifier systems is a good choice if the resources permit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1999320.1999331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1999320.1999331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

几种机器学习方法的激增使得很难确定一种适合分析高分辨率遥感图像的分类技术。在这项研究中,从五大机器学习类别中比较了十种分类技术。令人惊讶的是,简单的统计分类方案,如最大似然和逻辑回归,与复杂和最新的技术相比,性能非常接近。鉴于这两种分类器对用户输入的要求很少,大多数分类任务仍应考虑使用它们。如果资源允许,多分类器系统是一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning approaches for high-resolution urban land cover classification: a comparative study
The proliferation of several machine learning approaches makes it difficult to identify a suitable classification technique for analyzing high-resolution remote sensing images. In this study, ten classification techniques were compared from five broad machine learning categories. Surprisingly, the performance of simple statistical classification schemes like maximum likelihood and Logistic regression over complex and recent techniques is very close. Given that these two classifiers require little input from the user, they should still be considered for most classification tasks. Multiple classifier systems is a good choice if the resources permit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信