自然语言需求中的语用歧义检测

Alessio Ferrari, G. Lipari, S. Gnesi, G. Spagnolo
{"title":"自然语言需求中的语用歧义检测","authors":"Alessio Ferrari, G. Lipari, S. Gnesi, G. Spagnolo","doi":"10.1109/AIRE.2014.6894849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an approach for pragmatic ambiguity detection in natural language requirements. Pragmatic ambiguities depend on the context of a requirement, which includes the background knowledge of the reader: different backgrounds can lead to different interpretations. The presented approach employs a graph-based modelling of the background knowledge of different readers, and uses a shortest-path search algorithm to model the pragmatic interpretation of a requirement. The comparison of different pragmatic interpretations is used to decide if a requirement is ambiguous or not. The paper also provides a case study on real-world requirements, where we have assessed the effectiveness of the approach.","PeriodicalId":300818,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE)","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pragmatic ambiguity detection in natural language requirements\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Ferrari, G. Lipari, S. Gnesi, G. Spagnolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIRE.2014.6894849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an approach for pragmatic ambiguity detection in natural language requirements. Pragmatic ambiguities depend on the context of a requirement, which includes the background knowledge of the reader: different backgrounds can lead to different interpretations. The presented approach employs a graph-based modelling of the background knowledge of different readers, and uses a shortest-path search algorithm to model the pragmatic interpretation of a requirement. The comparison of different pragmatic interpretations is used to decide if a requirement is ambiguous or not. The paper also provides a case study on real-world requirements, where we have assessed the effectiveness of the approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE)\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIRE.2014.6894849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIRE.2014.6894849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

提出了一种基于自然语言需求的语用歧义检测方法。语用歧义依赖于需求的上下文,其中包括读者的背景知识:不同的背景会导致不同的解释。所提出的方法采用基于图的不同读者背景知识建模,并使用最短路径搜索算法对需求的语用解释建模。通过比较不同的语用解释来判断需求是否具有歧义性。本文还提供了一个实际需求的案例研究,我们在其中评估了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pragmatic ambiguity detection in natural language requirements
This paper presents an approach for pragmatic ambiguity detection in natural language requirements. Pragmatic ambiguities depend on the context of a requirement, which includes the background knowledge of the reader: different backgrounds can lead to different interpretations. The presented approach employs a graph-based modelling of the background knowledge of different readers, and uses a shortest-path search algorithm to model the pragmatic interpretation of a requirement. The comparison of different pragmatic interpretations is used to decide if a requirement is ambiguous or not. The paper also provides a case study on real-world requirements, where we have assessed the effectiveness of the approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信