评估机电产品开发团队的敏捷性

L. Becerril, C. Hollauer, U. Lindemann
{"title":"评估机电产品开发团队的敏捷性","authors":"L. Becerril, C. Hollauer, U. Lindemann","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although agile development is increasingly being applied outside software development, the methods, tools and techniques are still new to the manufacturing industry. A major barrier is the difficulty to measure the benefits and limitations. Comparing the working practices of a team before and after implementing agile methods would provide some insights into the applicability and usefulness of concrete methods and tools in the context of mechatronic-product development. Nevertheless, existing agility assessment approaches are subjective, software centered, and/or require previous application of agile methods. The goal of this paper is to provide a holistic assessment of a team’s agility independently of the methods, tools and techniques applied. For this purpose, agile, non-agile and hybrid practices provide a frame of reference to characterize how teams work across 12 project processes (e.g. project monitoring) and five levels of agility.","PeriodicalId":119238,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Agility of Teams within Mechatronic Product Development\",\"authors\":\"L. Becerril, C. Hollauer, U. Lindemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although agile development is increasingly being applied outside software development, the methods, tools and techniques are still new to the manufacturing industry. A major barrier is the difficulty to measure the benefits and limitations. Comparing the working practices of a team before and after implementing agile methods would provide some insights into the applicability and usefulness of concrete methods and tools in the context of mechatronic-product development. Nevertheless, existing agility assessment approaches are subjective, software centered, and/or require previous application of agile methods. The goal of this paper is to provide a holistic assessment of a team’s agility independently of the methods, tools and techniques applied. For this purpose, agile, non-agile and hybrid practices provide a frame of reference to characterize how teams work across 12 project processes (e.g. project monitoring) and five levels of agility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管敏捷开发越来越多地应用于软件开发之外,但其方法、工具和技术对制造业来说仍然是新的。一个主要障碍是难以衡量效益和局限性。比较团队在实施敏捷方法之前和之后的工作实践,可以对具体方法和工具在机电产品开发环境中的适用性和有用性提供一些见解。然而,现有的敏捷性评估方法是主观的,以软件为中心的,并且/或者需要之前应用敏捷方法。本文的目标是提供一个独立于所应用的方法、工具和技术的团队敏捷性的全面评估。为此,敏捷、非敏捷和混合实践提供了一个参考框架,以描述团队如何跨12个项目过程(例如项目监控)和5个敏捷级别进行工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Agility of Teams within Mechatronic Product Development
Although agile development is increasingly being applied outside software development, the methods, tools and techniques are still new to the manufacturing industry. A major barrier is the difficulty to measure the benefits and limitations. Comparing the working practices of a team before and after implementing agile methods would provide some insights into the applicability and usefulness of concrete methods and tools in the context of mechatronic-product development. Nevertheless, existing agility assessment approaches are subjective, software centered, and/or require previous application of agile methods. The goal of this paper is to provide a holistic assessment of a team’s agility independently of the methods, tools and techniques applied. For this purpose, agile, non-agile and hybrid practices provide a frame of reference to characterize how teams work across 12 project processes (e.g. project monitoring) and five levels of agility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信