{"title":"相对于伪随机预言机的电路大小的勘误表","authors":"J. H. Lutz, William J. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/SCT.1991.160284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the above-titled paper (see Proc. Fifth Structure in Complexity Theory Conf., 1990, p.268-86) by the present authors it was claimed that two specified separations hold relative to every pspace-random oracle A, and relative to almost every oracle A in ESPACE. It is noted that the proofs given were not correct and that corrected proofs are being published elsewhere. Some further discussion regarding these proofs is presented.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":158682,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Errata for circuit size relative to pseudorandom oracles\",\"authors\":\"J. H. Lutz, William J. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCT.1991.160284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the above-titled paper (see Proc. Fifth Structure in Complexity Theory Conf., 1990, p.268-86) by the present authors it was claimed that two specified separations hold relative to every pspace-random oracle A, and relative to almost every oracle A in ESPACE. It is noted that the proofs given were not correct and that corrected proofs are being published elsewhere. Some further discussion regarding these proofs is presented.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1991] Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1991] Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCT.1991.160284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCT.1991.160284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Errata for circuit size relative to pseudorandom oracles
In the above-titled paper (see Proc. Fifth Structure in Complexity Theory Conf., 1990, p.268-86) by the present authors it was claimed that two specified separations hold relative to every pspace-random oracle A, and relative to almost every oracle A in ESPACE. It is noted that the proofs given were not correct and that corrected proofs are being published elsewhere. Some further discussion regarding these proofs is presented.<>