技能的价值

F. Green
{"title":"技能的价值","authors":"F. Green","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt1t89c1j.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many commentators have argued that \"key skills\" are becoming more important in modern workplaces. This paper draws on a survey that uses a methodology based on job analysis to measure skills at work, and estimates their implicit prices using a hedonic wage equation. The main new findings are that: (a) Computer skills are highly valued in the current British labour market. Even at \"moderate\" levels of complexity, for example using word-processing packages, workers using computers earn an average premium (after controlling for other job skills) in excess of 20 per cent, compared to those who do not use computers at all. (b) Professional communication and problem-solving skills are also highly valued. A one-standard-deviation increase in either type of skill raises pay by around 5 per cent, after allowing for all the controls. To a lesser extent, verbal skills also carry a pay premium for women. But planning, and client and horizontal communication skills, have little independent association with pay. Numerical skills also have no conditional link with pay, other than through being associated with more complex computer usage. (c) Jobs involving task variety earn more pay, but there is no strong evidence that greater autonomy is positively rewarded. (d) Participating in Quality Circles and, more tentatively, in organised work teams attracts a pay premium. (e) Jobs which require a long learning time, which deploy transferable skills, and/or for which there are higher qualifications requirements command a higher pay. (f) A reasonably complete job analysis provides a useful means of accounting for a wage distribution via a hedonic wage equation.","PeriodicalId":166258,"journal":{"name":"Learn to Succeed","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of skills\",\"authors\":\"F. Green\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctt1t89c1j.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many commentators have argued that \\\"key skills\\\" are becoming more important in modern workplaces. This paper draws on a survey that uses a methodology based on job analysis to measure skills at work, and estimates their implicit prices using a hedonic wage equation. The main new findings are that: (a) Computer skills are highly valued in the current British labour market. Even at \\\"moderate\\\" levels of complexity, for example using word-processing packages, workers using computers earn an average premium (after controlling for other job skills) in excess of 20 per cent, compared to those who do not use computers at all. (b) Professional communication and problem-solving skills are also highly valued. A one-standard-deviation increase in either type of skill raises pay by around 5 per cent, after allowing for all the controls. To a lesser extent, verbal skills also carry a pay premium for women. But planning, and client and horizontal communication skills, have little independent association with pay. Numerical skills also have no conditional link with pay, other than through being associated with more complex computer usage. (c) Jobs involving task variety earn more pay, but there is no strong evidence that greater autonomy is positively rewarded. (d) Participating in Quality Circles and, more tentatively, in organised work teams attracts a pay premium. (e) Jobs which require a long learning time, which deploy transferable skills, and/or for which there are higher qualifications requirements command a higher pay. (f) A reasonably complete job analysis provides a useful means of accounting for a wage distribution via a hedonic wage equation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learn to Succeed\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learn to Succeed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89c1j.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learn to Succeed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89c1j.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

摘要

许多评论人士认为,在现代职场中,“关键技能”正变得越来越重要。本文借鉴了一项调查,该调查使用基于工作分析的方法来衡量工作中的技能,并使用享乐工资方程估计其隐含价格。主要的新发现是:(a)计算机技能在当前的英国劳动力市场上受到高度重视。即使是在“中等”复杂程度上,例如使用文字处理软件包,使用电脑的员工(在控制了其他工作技能之后)也比完全不使用电脑的员工平均多赚20%以上。(b)专业沟通和解决问题的能力也受到高度重视。在考虑所有控制因素后,这两种技能每提高一个标准差,工资就会提高5%左右。在较小程度上,口头表达能力也会给女性带来额外的收入。但计划、客户和横向沟通技巧与薪酬几乎没有独立的联系。除了与更复杂的计算机使用相关外,数字技能与薪酬也没有条件联系。(c)任务多样化的工作收入更高,但没有强有力的证据表明更大的自主权会带来积极的回报。(d)参加质量小组,或尝试性地参加有组织的工作小组,可获得额外的薪酬。(e)需要较长学习时间、调动可转移技能和/或资格要求较高的工作要求较高的工资。(f)一份相当完整的职业分析提供了一种有用的方法,可以通过享乐工资方程式来解释工资分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of skills
Many commentators have argued that "key skills" are becoming more important in modern workplaces. This paper draws on a survey that uses a methodology based on job analysis to measure skills at work, and estimates their implicit prices using a hedonic wage equation. The main new findings are that: (a) Computer skills are highly valued in the current British labour market. Even at "moderate" levels of complexity, for example using word-processing packages, workers using computers earn an average premium (after controlling for other job skills) in excess of 20 per cent, compared to those who do not use computers at all. (b) Professional communication and problem-solving skills are also highly valued. A one-standard-deviation increase in either type of skill raises pay by around 5 per cent, after allowing for all the controls. To a lesser extent, verbal skills also carry a pay premium for women. But planning, and client and horizontal communication skills, have little independent association with pay. Numerical skills also have no conditional link with pay, other than through being associated with more complex computer usage. (c) Jobs involving task variety earn more pay, but there is no strong evidence that greater autonomy is positively rewarded. (d) Participating in Quality Circles and, more tentatively, in organised work teams attracts a pay premium. (e) Jobs which require a long learning time, which deploy transferable skills, and/or for which there are higher qualifications requirements command a higher pay. (f) A reasonably complete job analysis provides a useful means of accounting for a wage distribution via a hedonic wage equation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信