使用不同分类器的SMOTE、Borderline-SMOTE和ADASYN过采样技术的比较研究

I. Dey, Vibhav Pratap
{"title":"使用不同分类器的SMOTE、Borderline-SMOTE和ADASYN过采样技术的比较研究","authors":"I. Dey, Vibhav Pratap","doi":"10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of machine learning and its numerous techniques, many real-world problems have been solved like credit card fraud detection, cancer susceptibility and survival prediction, identification of spam, and customer segmentation, to name a few. Machine learning works on huge loads of data to give the correct prediction and maximum accuracy. Now, accuracy of any machine learning model depends on the dataset been fed into that model, in the first place. And from here comes the concept of oversampling and under-sampling. Under-sampling is the process of shortening the majority class or deleting samples from the majority class in order to balance the dataset, and over-sampling is the process of adding additional synthetic samples to the minority class. So, this study is based on the three methods namely, SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, and ADASYN. This study includes the collation of the above-mentioned oversampling techniques based on their accuracy, precision, recall, F1-measure and ROC curve.","PeriodicalId":373017,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, and ADASYN Oversampling Techniques using Different Classifiers\",\"authors\":\"I. Dey, Vibhav Pratap\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of machine learning and its numerous techniques, many real-world problems have been solved like credit card fraud detection, cancer susceptibility and survival prediction, identification of spam, and customer segmentation, to name a few. Machine learning works on huge loads of data to give the correct prediction and maximum accuracy. Now, accuracy of any machine learning model depends on the dataset been fed into that model, in the first place. And from here comes the concept of oversampling and under-sampling. Under-sampling is the process of shortening the majority class or deleting samples from the majority class in order to balance the dataset, and over-sampling is the process of adding additional synthetic samples to the minority class. So, this study is based on the three methods namely, SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, and ADASYN. This study includes the collation of the above-mentioned oversampling techniques based on their accuracy, precision, recall, F1-measure and ROC curve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着机器学习及其众多技术的出现,许多现实世界的问题已经得到解决,如信用卡欺诈检测、癌症易感性和生存预测、垃圾邮件识别和客户细分等。机器学习在大量数据上工作,以提供正确的预测和最大的准确性。现在,任何机器学习模型的准确性首先取决于输入该模型的数据集。于是就有了过采样和欠采样的概念。欠采样是为了平衡数据集而缩短多数类或从多数类中删除样本的过程,而过度采样是向少数类添加额外合成样本的过程。因此,本研究基于三种方法,即SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE和ADASYN。本研究包括对上述过采样技术的准确度、精密度、召回率、f1测量值和ROC曲线进行整理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, and ADASYN Oversampling Techniques using Different Classifiers
With the advent of machine learning and its numerous techniques, many real-world problems have been solved like credit card fraud detection, cancer susceptibility and survival prediction, identification of spam, and customer segmentation, to name a few. Machine learning works on huge loads of data to give the correct prediction and maximum accuracy. Now, accuracy of any machine learning model depends on the dataset been fed into that model, in the first place. And from here comes the concept of oversampling and under-sampling. Under-sampling is the process of shortening the majority class or deleting samples from the majority class in order to balance the dataset, and over-sampling is the process of adding additional synthetic samples to the minority class. So, this study is based on the three methods namely, SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, and ADASYN. This study includes the collation of the above-mentioned oversampling techniques based on their accuracy, precision, recall, F1-measure and ROC curve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信