浅静脉热闭塞术后静脉血栓栓塞并发症的风险评估及预防现状

K. Lobastov, M. Shaldina, D. Borsuk, I. Schastlivtsev, L. Laberko, А. Fokin
{"title":"浅静脉热闭塞术后静脉血栓栓塞并发症的风险评估及预防现状","authors":"K. Lobastov, M. Shaldina, D. Borsuk, I. Schastlivtsev, L. Laberko, А. Fokin","doi":"10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-2-62-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Venous thromboembolic complications (VTEO) after modern minimally invasive superficial vein interventions are an infrequent but very dramatic event. This article presents a review of the literature, covering the issues of prevalence, prognosis and pharmacological prevention of VTEO. The performed studies demonstrate that the incidence of symptomatic thrombotic complications after endovenous thermal obliteration does not exceed 0,5%, but taking into account asymptomatic thermally induced thromboses and subclinical occlusions of the muscular veins of the lower leg, this figure can exceed 10%. There is a high heterogeneity of the data, possibly due to differences in the individual risk of VTEO. The most validated tool for assessing the latter is the Caprini Scale, which has not been sufficiently studied in the surgical treatment of varicose veins. The administration of prophylactic doses of anticoagulants after thermal obliteration of saphenous veins is widely used in routine clinical practice, despite the lack of convincing evidence for the appropriateness of this approach. In recent years, the use of direct oral anticoagulants against the official instruction (off-label) has gained great popularity as an alternative to heparin. The largest evidence base has accumulated for the use of rivaroxaban 10 mg, which is associated with high efficacy and safety. Based on completed clinical trials, it is not possible to formulate unequivocal recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulant doses after thermal obliteration of superficial veins at this time. Additional studies are required to identify patients with an individually increased risk of thrombosis in whom prophylactic doses of anticoagulants may be of maximum benefit.","PeriodicalId":398195,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current state of the problem of risk assessment and prevention of venous thromboembolic complications after thermal obliteration of superficial veins\",\"authors\":\"K. Lobastov, M. Shaldina, D. Borsuk, I. Schastlivtsev, L. Laberko, А. Fokin\",\"doi\":\"10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-2-62-71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Venous thromboembolic complications (VTEO) after modern minimally invasive superficial vein interventions are an infrequent but very dramatic event. This article presents a review of the literature, covering the issues of prevalence, prognosis and pharmacological prevention of VTEO. The performed studies demonstrate that the incidence of symptomatic thrombotic complications after endovenous thermal obliteration does not exceed 0,5%, but taking into account asymptomatic thermally induced thromboses and subclinical occlusions of the muscular veins of the lower leg, this figure can exceed 10%. There is a high heterogeneity of the data, possibly due to differences in the individual risk of VTEO. The most validated tool for assessing the latter is the Caprini Scale, which has not been sufficiently studied in the surgical treatment of varicose veins. The administration of prophylactic doses of anticoagulants after thermal obliteration of saphenous veins is widely used in routine clinical practice, despite the lack of convincing evidence for the appropriateness of this approach. In recent years, the use of direct oral anticoagulants against the official instruction (off-label) has gained great popularity as an alternative to heparin. The largest evidence base has accumulated for the use of rivaroxaban 10 mg, which is associated with high efficacy and safety. Based on completed clinical trials, it is not possible to formulate unequivocal recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulant doses after thermal obliteration of superficial veins at this time. Additional studies are required to identify patients with an individually increased risk of thrombosis in whom prophylactic doses of anticoagulants may be of maximum benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)\",\"volume\":\"188 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-2-62-71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-2-62-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞并发症(VTEO)后,现代微创浅静脉干预是一个罕见的,但非常严重的事件。本文综述了VTEO的流行、预后和药物预防等方面的文献。已进行的研究表明,静脉内热闭塞后症状性血栓并发症的发生率不超过0.5%,但考虑到无症状性热致血栓和下肢肌静脉亚临床闭塞,这一数字可超过10%。数据有很高的异质性,可能是由于VTEO个体风险的差异。评估后者最有效的工具是capriti量表,但在静脉曲张的手术治疗中尚未得到充分的研究。尽管缺乏令人信服的证据证明这种方法的适当性,但在常规临床实践中,大隐静脉热闭塞后给予预防性剂量的抗凝剂是广泛使用的。近年来,直接使用口服抗凝剂违反官方指示(标签外)已经获得了广泛的普及,作为肝素的替代品。利伐沙班10mg的使用已经积累了最大的证据基础,它具有较高的有效性和安全性。基于已完成的临床试验,目前尚不可能制定明确的浅表静脉热闭塞后预防性抗凝剂量建议。需要进一步的研究来确定个体血栓形成风险增加的患者,预防剂量的抗凝剂可能对其有最大的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current state of the problem of risk assessment and prevention of venous thromboembolic complications after thermal obliteration of superficial veins
Venous thromboembolic complications (VTEO) after modern minimally invasive superficial vein interventions are an infrequent but very dramatic event. This article presents a review of the literature, covering the issues of prevalence, prognosis and pharmacological prevention of VTEO. The performed studies demonstrate that the incidence of symptomatic thrombotic complications after endovenous thermal obliteration does not exceed 0,5%, but taking into account asymptomatic thermally induced thromboses and subclinical occlusions of the muscular veins of the lower leg, this figure can exceed 10%. There is a high heterogeneity of the data, possibly due to differences in the individual risk of VTEO. The most validated tool for assessing the latter is the Caprini Scale, which has not been sufficiently studied in the surgical treatment of varicose veins. The administration of prophylactic doses of anticoagulants after thermal obliteration of saphenous veins is widely used in routine clinical practice, despite the lack of convincing evidence for the appropriateness of this approach. In recent years, the use of direct oral anticoagulants against the official instruction (off-label) has gained great popularity as an alternative to heparin. The largest evidence base has accumulated for the use of rivaroxaban 10 mg, which is associated with high efficacy and safety. Based on completed clinical trials, it is not possible to formulate unequivocal recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulant doses after thermal obliteration of superficial veins at this time. Additional studies are required to identify patients with an individually increased risk of thrombosis in whom prophylactic doses of anticoagulants may be of maximum benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信